Hydraulic bench testing of the TruCATH™/TruCCOM™ continuous cardiac output monitor

Cardiovascular Engineering

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 93-102

  Segers, Patrick ^a   Vandenberghe, Stijn ^a   Decruyenaere, Johan ^b   Poelaert, Jan ^b   Wouters, Patrick ^c   Colardyn, Francis ^b   Verdonck, Pascal ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Experimental; In vitro; Monitoring; Thermodilution

Indexed keywords

ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY RESOURCE; HEART CATHETER; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART FUNCTION TEST; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HEART VENTRICLE PRESSURE; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; LINEAR SYSTEM; LOADING TEST; LUNG RESISTANCE; PULMONARY ARTERY; PULSATILE FLOW; RANDOMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; THERMISTOR; THERMODILUTION; VISCOSITY; VOLUMETRY;

EID: 4344586880     PISSN: 15678822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:CARE.0000015101.72782.a7     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aranda M, Mihm F, Garrett S, Mihm M, and Pearl R. Continuous cardiac output catheters. Delay in in vitro response time after controlled flow changes. Anesthesiology 89: 1592-1595, 1998.
2. Bland J, and Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307-310, 1986.
3. Boldt JMT, Wollbruck M, Hammerman H, and Hempelmann G. Is continuous cardiac output measurement using thermodilution reliable in the critically ill patient? Crit Care Med 22: 1913-1918, 1994.
4. 2 rebreathing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35: 653-661, 1988.
5. 2 tensions and cardiac output by rebreathing method. Respir Physiol 1: 258-264, 1966.
6. 2 tensions by rebreathing. J Appl Physiol 9: 25-29, 1956.
7. 2 rebreathing cardiac output method in seriously ill patients. Circulations 55: 449-455, 1977.
8. Gedeon A, Forslund L, Hedenstierna G, and Romano E. A new method for noninvasive bedside determination of pulmonary blood flow. Med Biol Eng Comp 18: 411-418, 1980.
9. Haryadi D, Orr J, Kuck K, and Westenskow D. Limited reproducibility of thermodilution hampers evaluation of new cardiac output monitoring devices. J Clin Monit Comp 15: 85-91, 1999.
10. Kubicek W. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerospace Med 12: 1208-1212, 1966.
11. Milnor W. Hemodynamics. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1989.
12. Perrino A, Fleming J, and LaMantia K. Transesophageal Doppler ultasonography: Evidence for improved cardiac output monitoring. Anesth Analg 71: 651-657, 1990.
13. Perrino A, O'Connor T, and Luther M. Transtracheal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: Comparison to thermodilution during noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 78: 1060-1066, 1994.
14. Pnueli D, and Gutfinger C. Fluid Mechanics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
15. Singer M, Clarke J, and Bennett. E. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring by esophageal Doppler, Crit Care Med 15: 886-888, 1989.
16. Stewart G. The pulmonary circulation time, the quantity of blood in the lungs and the output of the heart. Am J Physiol 58: 20-44, 1921.
17. Swan H, Ganz W, Forrester J, Marcus H, Diamond G, and Chonette D. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed, balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med 283: 447-451, 1970.
18. Verdonck P, Kleven A, Verhoeven R, Angelsen B, and Vandenbogaerde J. Computer-controlled in vitro model of the human left heart. Med Biol Eng Comput 30: 656-659, 1992.
19. Wesseling K, Jansen J, Settels J, and Schreuder J. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 74: 2566-2573, 1993.
20. Womersley J. The Mathematical Analysis of the Arterial Circulation in a State of Oscillatory Motion. Wright Air Development Center, 1957.
21. Yelderman M. Continuous measurement of cardiac output with the use of stochastic system identification technique. J Clin Monit 6: 322-332, 1990.