Validation of minimal luminal area measured by intravascular ultrasound for assessment of functionally significant coronary stenosis: Comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 665-671

  Ahn, Jung Min ^a   Kang, Soo Jin ^a   Mintz, Gary S ^b   Oh, Jun Hyok ^a   Kim, Won Jang ^a   Lee, Jong Young ^a   Park, Duk Woo ^a   Lee, Seung Whan ^a   Kim, Young Hak ^a   Lee, Cheol Whan ^a   Park, Seong Wook ^a   Moon, Dae Hyuk ^a   Park, Seung Jung ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

coronary disease; myocardial perfusion imaging; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; THALLIUM CHLORIDE TL 201;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL PARAMETERS; CARDIAC PATIENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMAL LUMINAL AREA; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REFERENCE DATABASE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; VALIDATION STUDY;

AREA UNDER CURVE; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THALLIUM; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 79959501164     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: 18767605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. J.L. Orford, A. Lerman, and D.R. Holmes Routine intravascular ultrasound guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention: a critical reappraisal J Am Coll Cardiol 43 2004 1335 1342 (Pubitemid 38496334)
2. S.C. Smith Jr., T.E. Feldman, and J.W. Hirshfeld Jr. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary interventionsummary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) J Am Coll Cardiol 47 2006 216 235 (Pubitemid 43005194)
3. P.A. Tonino, B. De Bruyne, N.H. Pijls FAME Study Investigators Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention N Engl J Med 360 2009 213 224
4. A. Takagi, Y. Tsurumi, Y. Ishii, K. Suzuki, M. Kawana, and H. Kasanuki Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve Circulation 100 1999 250 255 (Pubitemid 29340130)
5. T. Nishioka, A.M. Amanullah, and H. Luo Clinical validation of intravascular ultrasound imaging for assessment of coronary stenosis severity: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 33 1999 1870 1878
6. A. Abizaid, G.S. Mintz, and A.D. Pichard Clinical, intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Am J Cardiol 82 1998 423 428 (Pubitemid 28389938)
7. M.J. Kern Use and abuse of IVUS and FFR by Magni V et al. or why you shouldn't believe the saying, "if you want to treat, use IVUS. If you don't, use FFR." Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 74 2009 811 813 author reply 814
8. V. Magni, A. Chieffo, and A. Colombo Evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis with intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve: its use and abuse Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73 2009 441 448
9. M.D. Cerqueira, N.J. Weissman, V. Dilsizian American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association Circulation 105 2002 539 542 (Pubitemid 34262671)
10. R. Hachamovitch, S.W. Hayes, J.D. Friedman, I. Cohen, and D.S. Berman Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD J Am Coll Cardiol 43 2004 200 208 (Pubitemid 38201145)
11. S.J. Park, W.H. Shim, and D.S. Ho A paclitaxel-eluting stent for the prevention of coronary restenosis N Engl J Med 348 2003 1537 1545 (Pubitemid 36437930)
12. G.S. Mintz, N.J. Weissman, and P.S. Teirstein Effect of intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy on in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound analysis from the gamma-1 study Circulation 102 2000 2915 2918
13. J.J. Popma, M.B. Leon, J.W. Moses SIRIUS Investigators Quantitative assessment of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in native coronary arteries Circulation 110 2004 3773 3780 (Pubitemid 40023975)
14. D.W. Park, S.C. Yun, and S.W. Lee Stent thrombosis, clinical events, and influence of prolonged clopidogrel use after placement of drug-eluting stent data from an observational cohort study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 1 2008 494 503
15. R. Hachamovitch, D.S. Berman, and L.J. Shaw Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction Circulation 97 1998 535 543 (Pubitemid 28090682)
16. L.J. Shaw, D.S. Berman, D.J. Maron COURAGE Investigators Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy Circulation 117 2008 1283 1291 (Pubitemid 351365675)
17. G.A. Lin, R.A. Dudley, F.L. Lucas, D.J. Malenka, E. Vittinghoff, and R.F. Redberg Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention JAMA 300 2008 1765 1773
18. C. Briguori, A. Anzuini, and F. Airoldi Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve Am J Cardiol 87 2001 136 141 (Pubitemid 32057220)
19. J.M. Hodgson If you want to stent...do intravascular ultrasound! J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 3 2010 818 820
20. M.A. Costa, M. Sabate, and R. Staico Anatomical and physiologic assessments in patients with small coronary artery disease: final results of the Physiologic and Anatomical Evaluation Prior to and After Stent Implantation in Small Coronary Vessels (PHANTOM) trial Am Heart J 153 2007 296.e17
21. A.S. Abizaid, G.S. Mintz, and R. Mehran Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings: importance of lumen dimensions Circulation 100 1999 256 261 (Pubitemid 29340131)
22. A.A. Fassa, K. Wagatsuma, and S.T. Higano Intravascular ultrasound-guided treatment for angiographically indeterminate left main coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study J Am Coll Cardiol 45 2005 204 211 (Pubitemid 40094726)
23. D. Brosh, S.T. Higano, R.J. Lennon, D.R. Holmes Jr., and A. Lerman Effect of lesion length on fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions Am Heart J 150 2005 338 343 (Pubitemid 41121949)
24. S.E. Nissen, J.C. Gurley, and C.L. Grines Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease Circulation 84 1991 1087 1099
25. M. Ragosta, A.H. Bishop, and L.C. Lipson Comparison between angiography and fractional flow reserve versus single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for determining lesion significance in patients with multivessel coronary disease Am J Cardiol 99 2007 896 902 (Pubitemid 46483275)