Identity formation in multiparty negotiations

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 167-187

  Swaab, Roderick I ^a   Postmes, Tom ^b   Spears, Russell ^c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; NEGOTIATING; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 42349101654     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/014466607X216124     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R. D., & Bator, R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363-377.
2. Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2002). The impact of anonymity and group identification on pro-group behaviour in computer-mediated groups. Small Group Research, 33, 590-610.
4. Barry, B., & Friedman, R. A. (1998). Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 345-359.
5. Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A., & Valley, K. L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 279-314.
6. Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (1999). Negotiation processes and outcomes in prosocially and egoistically motivated groups. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 385-402.
7. Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79-129.
8. Bouas, K. S., & Komorita, S. S. (1996). Group discussion and cooperation in social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1144-1150.
9. Brewer, M. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M. B. Brewer & B. E. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences. New York: Jossey-Bass.
10. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this 'we'? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
11. Cameron, J. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239-262.
12. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V. Y, & Bourguignon, D. (2003). We are one and I like it. The impact of entitativity on social identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(6), 735-754.
13. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(1), 1-11.
14. Dawes, R. M., Van de Kragt, A. J., & Orbell, J. M. (1988). Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: Experimental manipulations. Acta Psychologica, 68(1-3), 83-97.
15. De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes, 78(5), 889-905.
16. Diermeier, D., & Gailmard, S. (2006). Self interest, inequality, and entitlement in majoritarian decision making. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1(4), 327-350.
17. Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity as both cause and effect: The development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 57-76.
18. Eggins, R. A., Haslam, S. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2002). Social identity and negotiation: Subgroup representation and superordinate consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 887-899.
19. Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290-292.
20. Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, R, & Ouwerkerk, J. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psycholgy, 29, 371-389.
21. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: Group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 123-140.
22. Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., Guerrero Witt, M., & Oriña, M. M. (2006). Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive ingroup regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 426-439.
23. Gillespie, J. J., Brett, J. M., & Weingart, L. R. (2000). Interdependence, social motives, and outcome satisfaction in multiparty negotiation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(6), 779-797.
24. Haslam, A.,&McGarty, C. (2001). A 100 years of certitude? Social psychology, the experimental method and the management of scientific uncertainty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1-21.
25. Haslam, S. A. (1997). Stereotyping and social influence: Foundations of stereotype concensus. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers,&S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 119-143). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
26. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: SAGE Publications.
27. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C, Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C,&Reynolds, K. J. (1998). The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus. In W Stroebe&M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 203-239). Chichester, England: Wiley.
28. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C, Oakes, P J., Reynolds, K. J., Eggins, R. A.,&Nolan, M. (1998). When do stereotypes become really consensual? Investigating the group-based dynamics of the concensualization process. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 755-776.
29. Hogg, M. A., & Hardie, E. A. (1992). Self-categorization and depersonalized attraction: Two experiments on the relationship between self-prototypically and liking among group members. Unpublished manuscript, University of Queensland.
30. Hornsey, M. J.,&Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 143-156.
31. Hutcheson, G.,&Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
32. Jetten, J., Spears, R.,&Manstead, A. R. (1997). Strength of identification and intergroup differentiation: The influence of group norms. European Journal of Social Psycholgy, 27, 603-609.
33. Kahan, J. R,&Rapoport, A. (1984). Theories of coalition formation. New York: Erlbaum.
34. Kerr, N. L.,&Kaufman-Gilliland, C. M. (1994). Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 513-529.
35. Kerr, N. L.,&Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623-655.
36. Kramer, R. M.,&Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 1044-1057.
37. Krizan, Z.,&Baron, R. S. (2006). Group polarization and choice-dilemmas: How important is self-categorization? European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1).
38. Loewenstein, G. E, Thompson, L.,&Bazerman, M. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 426-441.
39. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40. Moore, D. A., Kurtzberg, T R., Thompson, L.,&Morris, M. W. (1999). Long and short routes to success in electronically mediated negotiations: Group affiliations and good vibrations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(1), 22-43.
41. Morris, M., Nadler, J., Kurtzberg, T,&Thompson, L. (2002). Schmooze or lose: Social friction and lubricatio in e-mail negotiations. Group Dynamics, 6(1), 89-100.
42. Nadler, J. (2004). Rapport in legal negotiation: How small talk can facilitate email dealmaking. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 9, 225-253.
43. O'Connor, K. M., de Dreu, C. K. W, Schroth, H., Barry, B., Lituchy, T,&Bazerman, M. H. (2002). What we want to do versus what we think we should do: An empirical investigation of intrapersonal conflict. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(5), 403-418.
44. Olekalns, M.,&Smith, P. (1999). Social value orientations and strategy choices in competitive negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(6), 657-668.
45. Postmes, T, Baray, G., Haslam, S. A., Morton, T.,&Swaab, R. I. (2006). The dynamics of personal and social identity formation. In T. Postmes&J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 215-236). London: Sage.
46. Postmes, T, Haslam, S. A.,&Swaab, R. I. (2005a). Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 1-42.
47. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 918-930.
48. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 341-371.
49. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Novak, R., & Lee, T. (2005b). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 747-763.
50. Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Light dale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 484-493.
51. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Buckingham: Open University Press.
52. Pruitt, D., & Rubin, J. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
53. Raudenbusch, S., Bryk, A., & Congdon, R. (2001). Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling (Version 5.05).
54. Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2007). Diversity as a source of common identity: Towards a social identity framework for studying the effects of diversity in organizations. British Journal of Management, 18, 19-29.
55. Robert, C., & Carnevale, P. J. (1997). Group choice in ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 256-279.
56. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57. Sassenberg, K., & Postmes, T. (2002). Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 463-480.
58. Sedikides, C, & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
59. Sedikides, C, Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). The self-serving bias in relational context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 378-386.
60. Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perceptions. Archives of Psychology, 27,1-60.
61. Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 183-193.
62. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications.
63. Spears, R. (2001). The interaction between the individual and collective self: Self-categorization in context. In C. Sedikides & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, and collective self: Partners, opponents, or strangers? (pp. 171-198). Philadelphia, PA: The Psychology Press.
64. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2), 121-134.
65. Swaab, R. I., Postmes, T, Van Beest, I., & Spears, R. (2007). Shared cognition as a product of, and precursor to, shared social identity: The role of communication in negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 187-199.
66. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
67. Thompson, L., Kray, L. J., & Lind, E. A. (1998). Cohesion and respect: An examination of group decision making and escalation dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 289-311.
68. Thompson, L., Valley, K. L., & Kramer, R. M. (1995). The Bittersweet feeling of success: An examination of social perception in negotiation. journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 467-492.
69. Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
71. Van Beest, I., Van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (2003). The excluded player in coalition formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 237-247.
72. Van Vugt, M., & De Cremer, D. (1999). Collective action in social dilemmas: The impact of group identification on the selection and cooperation with leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587-599.
73. Weingart, L. R., Bennett, R. J., & Brett, J. M. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 504-517.
74. Wilder, D., & Simon, A. F. (1998). Categorical and dynamic groups: Implications for social perception and intergroup behavior. In J. Schopler & C. Sedikides (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 27-44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Wilkinson, L., & The Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 34, 594-604.
76. Witt, A. P., & Kerr, N. L. (2002). 'Me versus just us versus us all' Categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 616-637.
77. Yuki, M. (2003). Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 166-183.