Rewriting writing in higher education: The contested spaces of proofreading

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 427-440

  Turner, Joan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic literacies; Academic roles; Ethics; International students; Language

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959417379     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075071003671786     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aitchison, C., and A. Lee 2006. Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education 11, no. 3: 265-278.
2. Berg, B.L. 2009. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5. Bourdieu, P. 1992. Language and symbolic power. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Bourdieu, P., and L.J.D. Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Carter, R., and W. Nash. 1990. Seeing through language. London: Basil Blackwell.
8. Crowley, T. 1989. The politics of discourse: The standard language question in British cultural debates. London: Macmillan.
9. Dysthe, O. 2002. Professors as mediators of academic text cultures: An interview study with advisors and masters degree students in three disciplines in a Norwegian university. Written Communication 19, no. 4: 493-544.
10. Gubrium, J.F., and J.A. Holstein 2002. Handbook of interview research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Haggis, T. 2006. Pedagogies for diversity: Retaining critical challenge amidst fears of 'dumbing down'. Studies in Higher Education 31, no. 5: 521-535.
12. Haggis, T. 2009. What have we been thinking of? A critical overview of 40 years of student learning research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 34, no. 4: 377-390.
13. Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
14. Harris, R., and T. Taylor. 1989. Landmarks in linguistic thought. The western tradition from Socrates to Saussure. London and New York: Routledge.
15. Harwood, N., L. Austin, and R. Macaulay. 2009. Proofeading in a UK university: Proofreaders' beliefs, practices, and experiences. Journal of Second Language Writing 18: 166-190.
16. Hill, P. 2008. Making writing invisible: A study into the complexities of standard written English acquisition in higher education. Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield.
17. Ivani, R. 1998. Writing and identity. The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Knight, N. 1999. Responsibilities and limits in the supervision of NESB research students in the social sciences. In Supervising postgraduates from non-English speaking backgrounds, ed. Y. Ryan and O. Zuber-Skerritt. Buckingham: Open University Press.
19. Krueger, R.A. 1998. Moderating focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Lea, M. 2004. Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education 29, no. 6: 739-756.
21. Lea, M., and B. Street. 1998. Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education 23, no. 2: 157-172.
22. Lillis, T. 2001. Student writing. Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
23. Lillis, T., and M. Scott. 2007. Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics 4, no. 1: 5-32.
24. Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
25. Nash, W. 1990. The writing scholar. Studies in academic discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Polanyi, M. 1967. The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan-Paul.
27. Reddy, M.J. 1979. The conduit metaphor - A case of conflict in our language about language. In Metaphor and thought, ed. A. Ortony, 284-324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Scott, M. 2003. Proofreading or 'what you will'? Learning Matters, 12.
29. Scott, M., and J. Turner 2008. Problematising proofreading. Zeitschrift Schreiben, October 3. http://www.zeitschriftschreiben.eu/Beitraege/scott_Proofreading.pdf
30. Scurr, R. 2006. It is not enough to read an essay and mark it; one must also guess if a student has purchased professional help. Times Higher Education, December 15, 13.
31. Stewart, D.W., P.M. Shamdasani, and D.W. Rook. 2006. Focus groups: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Turner, J. 1999a. Academic literacy and the discourse of transparency. In Students writing in the university: Cultural and epistemological issues, ed. C. Jones, J. Turner, and B. Street. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Turner, J. 1999b. Academic writing development in higher education: Changing the discourse. In Academic writing development in higher education: Perspectives, explorations and approaches, ed. P. Thompson. Reading: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading.
34. Woodward-Kron, R. 2007. Negotiating meanings and scaffolding learning: Writing support for non-English speaking background postgraduate students. Higher Education Research and Development 26, no. 3: 253-268.