Cochlear reimplantation with same device: Surgical and audiologic results

Laryngoscope

Volumn 121, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1517-1524

  Van Der Marel, Kim S ^a   Briaire, Jeroen J ^a   Verbist, Berit M ^a,b   Joemai, Raoul M S ^a   Boermans, Peter Paul B M ^a   Peek, Ferdinand A W ^a   Frijns, Johan H M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; electrode array displacement; performance; radiologic imaging; reimplantation; speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRODE; HUMAN; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REHABILITATION CARE; REIMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AUDIOMETRY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEARING LOSS; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; REPLANTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VOICE QUALITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959377855     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.21722     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alexiades G, Roland JT Jr., Fishman AJ, Shapiro W, Waltzman SB, Cohen NL,. Cochlear reimplantation: surgical techniques and functional results. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 1608-1613. (Pubitemid 32843864)
2. Balkany TJ, Hodges AV, Gomez-Marin O, et al. Cochlear reimplantation. Laryngoscope 1999; 109: 351-355. (Pubitemid 29128529)
3. Brown KD, Connell SS, Balkany TJ, Eshraghi AE, Telischi FF, Angeli SA,. Incidence and indications for revision cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Laryngoscope 2009; 119: 152-157.
4. Cote M, Ferron P, Bergeron F, Bussieres R,. Cochlear reimplantation: causes of failure, outcomes, and audiologic performance. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 1225-1235. (Pubitemid 47015673)
5. Fayad JN, Baino T, Parisier SC,. Revision cochlear implant surgery: causes and outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 131: 429-432. (Pubitemid 39298207)
6. Kim CS, Kim DK, Suh MW, Oh SH, Chang SO,. Clinical outcomes of cochlear reimplantation due to device failure. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 1: 10-14.
7. Lassig AA, Zwolan TA, Telian SA,. Cochlear implant failures and revision. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26: 624-634. (Pubitemid 41026086)
8. Gosepath J, Lippert K, Keilmann A, Mann WJ,. Analysis of fifty-six cochlear implant device failures. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2009; 71: 142-147.
9. Henson AM, Slattery WH III, Luxford WM, Mills DM,. Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: a multicenter study. Am J Otol 1999; 20: 56-64. (Pubitemid 29180058)
10. Miyamoto RT, Svirsky MA, Myres WA, Kirk KI, Schulte J,. Cochlear implant reimplantation. Am J Otol 1997; 18 (Suppl): S60-S61. (Pubitemid 27512623)
11. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Advanced Bionics conducts voluntary recall of cochlear implants [FDA web site]. September 24, 2004. Available at:. Accessed August 5, 2010.
12. Greenwood DD,. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2592-2605. (Pubitemid 20289735)
13. Verbist BM, Joemai RM, Briaire JJ, Teeuwisse WM, Veldkamp WJ, Frijns JH,. Cochlear coordinates in regard to cochlear implantation: a clinically individually applicable 3 dimensional CT-based method. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 738-744.
14. Lenarz T,. Cochlea-implantat. Ein praktischer Leitfaden fur die Versorgung von Kindern und Erwachsenen [in German]. Berlin: Springer; 1998.
15. Ruellan K, Frijns JH, Bloemberg GV, et al. Detection of bacterial biofilm on cochlear implants removed because of device failure, without evidence of infection. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 1320-1324.
16. Verbist BM, Ferrarini L, Briaire JJ, et al. Anatomic considerations of cochlear morphology and its implications for insertion trauma in cochlear implant surgery. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30: 471-477.
17. Verbist BM, Skinner MW, Cohen LT, et al. Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 722-730.
18. Frijns-van Putten A, Beers M, Snieder SG, Frijns JHM,. Hoortraining voor volwassen CI-dragers: Het cochleaire leermodel [in Dutch]. Logopedie en Foniatrie 2005; 77: 50-59.
19. Bosman AJ, Smoorenburg GF,. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology 1995; 34: 260-284. (Pubitemid 26039006)
20. Arnoldner C, Helbig S, Wagenblast J, Gstoettner W,. Cochlear implant reference electrode migration to dura mater. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30: 1013-1014.
21. Migirov L, Taitelbaum-Swead R, Hildesheimer M, Kronenberg J,. Revision surgeries in cochlear implant patients: a review of 45 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264: 3-7. (Pubitemid 44900292)
22. Parisier SC, Chute PM, Popp AL,. Cochlear implant mechanical failures. Am J Otol 1996; 17: 730-734. (Pubitemid 26341327)
23. Dodson KM, Maiberger PG, Sismanis A,. Intracranial complications of cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28: 459-462. (Pubitemid 47264548)
24. Stacey PC, Summerfield AQ,. Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training in improving the perception of noise-vocoded speech. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121: 2923-2935. (Pubitemid 46701287)
25. Stacey PC, Summerfield AQ,. Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51: 526-538. (Pubitemid 351838313)