Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: A multicenter study

American Journal of Otology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 56-64

  Henson, AnnMarie ^a   Slattery III, William H ^a   Luxford, William M ^a   Mills, Dawna M ^a  

^a HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Performance; Reimplantation; Replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032927934     PISSN: 01929763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (18)

1. Von Wallenberg E, Brinch J, Kinsbergen J. Ten years warranty: the benefit of proven reliability. Cochlear Implants: XVI World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Sydney, Australia: Monduzzi Editore S.p.A.-Bologna, Italy; 1997:63-7.
2. Greenberg AB, Myers MW, Hartshorn DO, et al. Cochlear electrode reimplantation in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1992;61:19-23.
3. Fayad J, Linthicum FH Jr, Otto SR, et al. Cochlear implants: histopathologic findings related to performance in 16 human temporal bones. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:807-11.
4. Jackler RK, Leake PA, McKerrow WS. Cochlear implant revision: effects of reimplantation on the cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;98:813-20.
5. Gantz BJ, Lowder MW, McCabe BF. Audiologic results following reimplantation of cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1989;142:12-6.
6. Saeed SR, Ramsden RT, Hartley C, et al. Cochlear reimplantation. J Laryngol Otol 1995;109:980-5.
7. Parisier SC, Chute PM, Popp AL. Cochlear implant mechanical failures. Am J Otol 1996;17:730-4.
8. Thomas DM, Abramovich S, Rakkar-Thomas S. An unusual cause of cochlear implant failure. J Laryngol Otol 1995;109:542-4.
9. Kileny PR, Meiteles LZ, Zwolan TA, et al. Cochlear implant device failure: diagnosis and management. Am J Otol 1995;16:164-71.
10. Peterson AM, Brey RH, Facer GW. Averaged electrode voltages used to identify nonfunctioning electrodes in cochlear implants: case study. J Am Acad Audiol 1995;6:243-9.
11. Thornton AR, Raffin MJ. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res 1978;21:507-18.
12. Davis H, Silverman SR. Hearing and deafness. 4th ed. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1978.
13. Tyler RS, Preece JP, Tye-Murray N. The Iowa phoneme and sentence tests. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, 1986.
14. Tillman TW, Carhart R. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55. Tech Rep SAM TR 1966:1-12.
15. Causey GD, Hood LJ, Hermanson CL, et al. The Maryland CNC Test: normative studies. Audiology 1984;23:552-68.
16. Spivak LG, Waltzman SB. Performance of cochlear implant patients as a function of time. J Speech Hear Res 1990;33:511-9.
17. Tye-Murray N, Tyler RS, Woodworth GG, et al. Performance over time with a Nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1992;13:200-9.
18. Loeb GE, Kessler DK. Speech recognition performance over time with the Clarion cochlear prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:290-2.