The role of large carnivore committees in legitimising large carnivore management in Finland and Sweden

Environmental Management

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 212-228

  Pellikka, Jani ^a   Sandström, Camilla ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Governance; Institutions; Large carnivores; Procedural legitimacy; Stakeholder participation

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DELIBERATIVE PROCESS; DIFFERENT ORIGINS; FINLAND; GOVERNANCE; INFORMATION EXCHANGES; INSTITUTIONAL SETTING; KEY ELEMENTS; LARGE CARNIVORES; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS; PROCEDURAL LEGITIMACY; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; STRONG LINK; SURVEY DATA; TOPDOWN;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; CARNIVORE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECENTRALIZATION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PERCEPTION; STAKEHOLDER; TOP-DOWN APPROACH;

ARTICLE; CARNIVORE; EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FINLAND; NONHUMAN; POLICY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SATISFACTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SWEDEN;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; ANIMALS; CARNIVORA; COMMUNICATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FINLAND; GOALS; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SWEDEN;

FINLAND; SWEDEN;

EID: 79959374066     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9672-x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andrén H, Svensson L, Liberg O, Hensel H, Hobbs NT, Chapron G (2010) Den svenska lodjurspopulationen 2009-2010 samt prognos för 2011-2012. Inventeringsrapport från Viltskadecenter 4/2010. SLU, Grimsö
2. Bäckstrand K, Khan J, Kronsell A, Lövbrand E (eds) (2010) Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: examining the promise of new modes of environmental governance. Edward Elgar Press, Cheltenham
3. Beetham D (1991) The Legitimation of power. Macmillan, Hampshire, p 267
4. F Berkes 2004 Rethinking community-based conservation Conservation Biology 18 3 621 630 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x (Pubitemid 38689083)
5. F Berkes 2008 Commons in a multi-level world International Journal of the Commons 2 1 6
6. F Berkes P George R Preston 1991 Co-management Alternatives 18 12 18
7. Blomquist W (1992) Dividing the waters: governing groundwater in Southern California. ICS Press, San Francisco, CA, p 402
8. Cinque S (2008) I vargens spår. Myndigheters handlingutrymme i förvaltningen av varg. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, p 240
9. Duit A, Galaz V, Löf A (2009) Fragmenterad förvirring eller kreativ arena? Från "government" till "governance" i svensk naturvårdspolitik. In: Sundström G, Pierre J (eds) Samhällsstyrning i förändring. Liber, Stockholm, pp 125-148
10. Finnish Government (2010) Government bill HE 237/2010. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/esitykset/he/2010/20100237. Accessed 31 Jan 2011
11. JS Gruber 2010 Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons Environmental Management 45 1 52 66 10.1007/s00267-008-9235-y
12. Heikkinen S, Kojola I (2010) Suurpetojen lukumäärä ja lisääntyminen vuonna 2009. In: Wikman M (ed) Monitoring game abundance in Finland in 2010. Riista- ja kalatalous-Selvityksiä 21/2010. Riista- ja kalatalouden tutkimuslaitos, Helsinki, pp 16-20
13. Kooiman J (1993) Modern Governance: new government-society interactions. Sage, London, p 280
14. Kronsell A, Bäckstrand K (2010) Rationalities and forms of governance: a framework for analysing the legitimacy of new modes of governance. In: Bäckstrand K, Khan J, Kronsell A, Lövbrand E (eds) Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: examining the promise of new modes of governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 28-46
15. M Lipset 1959 Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy The American Political Science Review 53 69 105 10.2307/1951731
16. SF McCool K Guthrie 2001 Mapping the dimensions of successful public participation in messy natural resources management situations Society and Natural Resources 14 309 323 10.1080/713847694 (Pubitemid 32325162)
17. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2005) Management plan for the wolf population in Finland. Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 11b/2005, Maa-ja metsätalousministeriö, Helsinki
18. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry (2007a) Management plan for the Lynx population in Finland. Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 1b/2007. Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö, Helsinki, p 64
19. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry (2007b) Management plan for the bear population in Finland. Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2/2007. Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö, Helsinki, p 64
20. Nie M (2003) Beyond wolves: the politics of wolf recovery and management. University of Minnesota Press, MN, p 270
21. J Pellikka P Salmi 2008 Collaborative moose hunting planning-a Finnish case Human Dimensions of Wildlife 13 400 415 10.1080/10871200802322959
22. Pierre J (2008) Decentralisering, governance och institutionell förändring. In: Rothstein B (ed) Politik som organisation. Förvaltningspolitikens grundproblem. SNS Förlag, Stockholm, pp 245-270
23. Pinkerton E (1989) Cooperative management of local fisheries, new directions for improved, management and community development. University of British Columbia Press, B.C, p 320
24. M Pohja-Mykrä T Vuorisalo S Mykrä 2005 Hunting bounties as a key measure of historical wildlife management and game conservation: Finnish bounty schemes 1647-1975 Oryx 39 284 291 10.1017/S0030605305000785
25. DB Raik B Lauber DJ Decker TL Brown 2005 Managing community controversy in suburban wildlife management: Adopting practices that address value differences Human Dimensions of Wildlife 10 109 122 10.1080/10871200590931806
26. F Rauschmayer A Berghöfer I Omann D Zikos 2009 Examining processes or/and outcomes? Evaluation concepts in European governance of natural resources Environmental Policy and Governance 19 159 173 10.1002/eet.506
27. Y Rydin M Pennington 2000 Public participation and local environmental planning: the collective action problem and the potential of social capital Local Environment 5 153 169 10.1080/13549830050009328 (Pubitemid 30329849)
28. C Sandström 2009 Institutional dimensions of co-management: participation, power and process Society & Natural Resources 22 230 244 10.1080/08941920802183354
29. C Sandström J Pellikka O Ratamäki A Sande 2009 Management of large carnivores in Fennoscandia: new patterns of regional participation Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14 37 50 10.1080/10871200802304726
30. TM Schusler DJ Decker MJ Pfeffer 2003 Social learning for collaborative natural resource management Society & Natural Resources 16 309 326 10.1080/08941920390178874 (Pubitemid 36533556)
31. Swedish Government (2000) Prop 2000/01:57 Sammanhållen rovdjurspolitik. http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c4/12/76/c6ba0dfe.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2011
32. Thomas CW (2003) Bureaucratic Landscapes: interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity. MA MIT Press, Cambridge, UK, p 368
33. Trachtenberg Z, Focht W (2005) Legitimacy and watershed collaborations: the role of public participation. In: Sabatier P, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (eds) Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 53-82
34. S Tuler T Webler 1999 Voices from the forest: What participants expect of a public participation process Society & Natural Resources 12 437 453 10.1080/089419299279524 (Pubitemid 29435308)
35. Turnhout E, Van Bommel S, Aarts N (2010) How participation creates citizens: participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society 15(4):26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art26/
36. UNEP/CBD/COP/5/23 (2000) V/6. Ecosystem approach
37. UNEP/CBD/COP/II/8 (1995) Preliminary consideration of components of biological diversity particularly under threat and action which could be taken under the convention
38. Viltskadecenter (2010) Resultat från inventering av lodjur i Sverige vintern 2009/10. Inventeringsrapport från Viltskadecenter 2010-3. http://www.de5stora.com/illustrationer/fil-20101207095021.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2011
39. Wabakken P, Aronson Å, Strømseth TH, Sand H, Maartmann E, Svensson L, Flagstad ∅, Hedmark E, Liberg O, Kojola I (2010) Ulv i Skandinavia: Statusrapport for vinteren 2009-2010. Høgskolen i Hedmark, Oppdragsrapport nr. 4
40. Weber M (1968) Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology, vol 1. University of California Press, Berkeley, p 640
41. T Webler S Tuler 2001 Public participation in watershed management planning: Views on process from people in the field Human Ecology Review 8 29 39 (Pubitemid 34063323)
42. T Webler S Tuler 2006 Four perspectives on public participation process in environmental assessment and decision making: Combined results from 10 case studies The Policy Studies Journal 34 699 722 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00198.x (Pubitemid 44921001)
43. Webler T, Tuler S (2008) Organizing a deliberative planning process: what does the science say? In: Odugbemi S, Jacobson T (eds) Governance reform under real-world conditions: citizens, stakeholders, and voice. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 125-160
44. H Wittmer F Rauschmayer B Klaue 2006 How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts? Land Use Policy 23 1 1 9 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.003 (Pubitemid 43071712)