Collaborative moose hunting planning: A Finnish case

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 400-415

  Pellikka, Jani ^a   Salmi, Pekka ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Influence; Moose management; Stakeholder

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 57049186663     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871200802322959     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Barrett-Howard, E., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 296-304.
2. Decker, D. J., & Chase, L. C. (1997). Human dimensions of living with wildlife - A management challenge for the 21st century. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25(4), 788-795.
3. Finnish Forest Research Institute (2006). Finnish statistical tearbook of forestry 2006. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki.
4. Fischler, R. (2000). Communicative planning theory: A Foucauldian Assessment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 358-368.
5. Guynn, D. E., & Landry, M. K. (1997). A case study of citizen participation as a success model for innovative solutions for natural resource problems. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25(2), 392-398.
6. Hampton, G. (1999). Environmental equity and public participation. Policy Sciences, 32(2), 163-174.
7. Halvorsen, K. E. (2001). Assessing public participation techniques for comfort, convenience, satisfaction, and deliberation. Environmental Management, 28(2), 179-186.
8. Halvorsen, K. E. (2006). Critical next steps in research on public meetings and environmental decision making. Human Ecology Review, 13(2), 150-160.
9. Hanna, S. (2003). The economics of co-management. In D. C. Wilson, J. R. Nielsen, & P. Degnbol (Eds.), Fisheries co-management experiences in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 51-60). Fish and Fisheries Series 26.
10. Horne, P., & Petäjistö, L. (2003). Preferences for alternative moose management regimes among Finnish landowners: a choice experiment approach. Land Economics, 79(4), 472-482.
11. Hunting Act (1993). 28.3.1993/615. Available at http://www.finlex.fi/en/ laki/kaannokset/1993/en19930615.pdf
12. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
13. Kooiman, J., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2005). Governance and governability. In J. Kooiman, M. avinck, S. Jentoft, & R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life. Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 325-349). MARE publication Series, 3. Amsterdam University Press.
14. Kukkonen, M., Rita, H., Hohnwald, S., & Nygren, A. (2008). Treefall gaps of certified, conventionally managed and natural forests as regeneration sites for Neotropical timber trees in northern Honduras. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(7), 2163-2176.
15. Lauber, T. B., & Knuth, B. A. (1997). Fairness and moose management decision making. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25(4), 776-787.
16. Lauber, T. B., & Knuth, B. A. (1999). Measuring fairness in citizen participation: A case study of moose management. Society and Natural Resources, 11(1), 19-37.
17. Leuschner, W. A., Ritchie, V. P., & Stauffer, D. F. (1989). Opinions on wildlife: Responses of resource managers and wildlife users in the southeastern United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 17(1), 24-29.
18. Lord, J. K., & Cheng, A. S. (2006). Public involvement in State Fish and Wildlife Agencies in the U.S.: A thumbnail sketch of techniques and barriers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 11(1), 55-69.
19. Luoma, A. (2002). Moose hunting in Finland - Management of a heavily harvested population. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki.
20. McCool, S. F., & Guthrie, K. (2001). Mapping the dimensions of successful public participation in messy natural resources management situations. Society and Natural Resources, 14, 309-323.
21. McLaren, B. E., & Peterson, R. O. (1994). Wolves, moose, and tree rings on Isle Royale. Science, 266, 1555-1558.
22. Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö (2000). Metsätalouden hirvivahinkotyöryhmän muistio 2000. Työryhmämuistio MMM 11/2000.
23. Moore, S. A. (1996). Defining "succesfull" environmental dispute resolution: Case studies from public land planning in the United States and Australia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, 151-169.
24. Mortenson, K. G., & Krannich, R. S. (2001). Wildlife managers and public involvement: Letting the crazy aunt out. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 6(4), 277-290.
25. Pellikka, J., & Nummi, P. (2002). Evaluation of moose density in Finland using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Suomen Riista, 48, 80-89.
26. Pellikka, J., Lindén, H., Rita, H., & Svensberg, M. (2007). Motives for voluntary wildlife monitoring in Finnish hunting teams. Wildlife Biology, 13(1), 1-10.
27. Pellikka, J., & Salmi, P. (2007). Participation of interest groups in the regional consultative committees of ungulates and large carnivores. Suomen Riista, 53, 64-75.
28. Penttilä, R., Lindgren, M., Miettinen, O., Rita, H., & Hanski, I. (2006). Consequences of forest fragmentation for polyporous fungi at two spatial scales. Oikos, 114, 225-240.
29. OECD (2001). Citizens as partners: Information, consultation and public participation in policymaking. Paris: OECD.
30. Raik, D. B., Siemer, W. F., & Decker, D. J. (2005). Intervention and capacity considerations in community-based deer management: The stakeholders' perspective. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 10(4), 259-272.
31. Raik, D. B., Lauber, B., Decker, D. J., & Brown, T. L. (2005). Managing community controversy in suburban wildlife management: Adopting practices that address value differences. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 10(2), 109-122.
32. Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(1), 3-29.
33. Rydin, Y., & Pennington, M. (2000). Public participation and local environmental planning: The collective action problem and the potential of social capital. Local Environment, 5, 153-169.
34. Schusler, T. M., Decker, D. J., & Pfeffer, M. J. (2003). Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 16(4), 309-326.
35. Storaas, T., Andreassen, H. P., Gundersen, H., & Henriksen, H. (2001). The economic value of moose in Norway - A review. Alces, 37, 97-107.
36. Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., & Reed, M. S. (2006). Unpacking "participation" in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: A critical review. Ecology & Society, 11(2), 39.
37. Sylvén, S. (2003). Management and regulated harvest of moose (Alces alces) in Sweden. Doctoral dissertation. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae. Series Agraria, 371.
38. Tiehallinto (2006). Hirvieläinonnettomuudet maanteillä vuonna 2005. Tiehallinnon tilastoja 4/2006.
39. Tuler, S., & Webler, T. (1999). Voices from the forest: What participants expect of a public participation process. Society and Natural Resources, 12(5), 437-453.
40. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four cases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 333-344.
41. Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22(1), 103-135.
42. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Oxford: University Press.
43. Warren, R. J. (1997). The challenge of deer overabundance in the 21st century. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25(2), 213-214.
44. Webler, T., & Tuler, S. (2001). Public participation in watershed management planning: Views on process from people in the field. Human Ecology Review, 8(2), 29-39.
45. Webler, T., & Tuler, S. (2006). Four perspectives on public participation process in environmental assessment and decision making: Combined results from 10 case studies. The Policy Studies Journal, 34(4), 699-722.
46. Webler, T., Tuler, S., & Krueger, R. (2001). What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management, 27(3), 435-450.
47. Wengert, N. (1976). Citizen participation: Practice in search of a theory. Natural Resources Journal, 16(1), 23-40.
48. Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (1994). Building bridges across agency boundaries: In search of excellence in the United States Forest Service. Ann Arbor, MI: USDA-Forest Service.
49. Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.