A Joint Modeling Approach for Reaction Time and Accuracy in Psycholinguistic Experiments

Psychometrika

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 487-503

  Loeys, T ^a   Rosseel, Y ^a   Baten, K ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bayesian estimation; joint modeling; psycholinguistic experiment; reaction time

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959373207     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-011-9211-y     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.
2. Baten, K., Hofman, F., & Loeys, T. (2011, in press). Cross-lingual activation in bilingual sentence processing: the role of word class meaning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
3. Bates, D. M., & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (version 0. 9975-12) [R software package]. Retrieved from http://CRAN. R-project. org/.
4. Bloxom, B. (1985). Considerations in psychometric modeling of response time. Psychometrika, 50, 383-397.
5. Carlin, B. P., & Louis, T. A. (2000). Bayes and empirical Bayes methods of data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.
6. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
7. Entink, R. H. K., Hornke, L. F., Kuhn, J.-T., & Fox, J.-P. (2009). Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response times. Psychological Methods, 14, 54-75.
8. Farrell, S., & Ludwig, C. J. H. (2008). Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation of hierarchical response time models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1209-1217.
9. Jaeger, F. T. (2008). Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434-446.
10. Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. (2000). WinBUGS-a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure and extensibility. Statistics and Computing, 10, 325-337.
11. Ntzoufras, I. (2009). Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS. Hoboken: Wiley.
12. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-426.
13. Raudenbush, S. W. (1993). A crossed random effects model for unbalanced data with applications in cross-sectional and longitudinal research. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 321-349.
14. R Development Core Team (2009). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www. R-project. org.
15. Rouder, J., Sun, D., Speckmanm, P. L., Lu, J., & Zhou, D. (2003). A hierarchical Bayesian statistical framework for response time distributions. Psychometrika, 68, 589-606.
16. Rouder, J., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 573-604.
17. Rouder, J., Lu, J., Sun, D., Speckman, P., Morey, R., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2007). Signal detection with random participant and item effects. Psychometrika, 72(4), 621-642.
18. Rouder, J., Lu, J., Morey, R., Sun, D., & Speckman, P. (2008a). A hierarchical process-dissociation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 370-389.
19. Rouder, J., Tuerlinckx, F., Speckman, P., Lu, J., & Gomez, P. (2008b). A hierarchical approach for fitting curves to response time measurements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1201-1208.
20. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 64, 586-639.
21. Sturtz, S., Ligges, U., & Gelman, A. (2005). R2WinBUGS: a package for running WinBUGS from R. Journal of Statistical Software, 12(3), 1-16.
22. van Breukelen, G. (2005). Psychometric modeling of response speed and accuracy with mixed and conditional regression. Psychometrika, 70(2), 359-376.
23. Vandekerckhove, J., Verheyen, S., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2010). A crossed random effects diffusion model for speeded semantic categorization decisions. Acta Psychologica, 133, 269-282.
24. Van der Linden, W. (2006). A lognormal model for response times on test items. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(2), 181-204.
25. Van der Linden, W. (2007). A hierarchical framework for speed and accuracy on test items. Psychometrika, 72(3), 287-308.
26. Van der Linden, W. (2009). Conceptual issues in response-time modeling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46(3), 247-272.
27. Van der Linden, W. (2010). Linking response-time parameters onto a common scale. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47(1), 92-114.
28. Wenger, M. J., & Gibson, B. S. (2004). Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30(4), 708-719.