Psychometric modeling of response speed and accuracy with mixed and conditional regression

Psychometrika

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 359-376

  Van Breukelen, Gerard J P ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Conditional accuracy function; Conditional logistic regression; Cox regression, mixed regression; Latent trait; Mental rotation; Multilevel analysis; Speed accuracy tradeoff; Time limit tests

Indexed keywords

EID: 24344486142     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-003-1078-0     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Bloxom, B. (1985). Considerations in psychometric modeling of response time. Psychometrika, 50, 383-397.
2. Cox, D.R. (1972). Regression models and life tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 34, 187-220.
3. Cox, D.R., & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of Survival Data. London: Chapman and Hall.
4. Donders, R. (1997). The Validity of Basic Assumptions Underlying Models for Time Limit Tests. PhD thesis, Nijmegen University, The Netherlands.
5. Fischer, G.H. (1974). Einführung in die theorie psychologischer tests [Introduction to the theory of psychological tests] Bern: Huber.
6. Gao, S. (2004). A shared random effect parameter approach for longitudinal dementia data with non-ignorable missing data. Statistics in Medicine, 23, 211-219.
7. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel Statistical Models. (2nd ed) London: Edward Arnold.
8. Hambleton, R.K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Boston (MA): Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R.D. (1996a). MIXOR: a computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 49, 157-176.
10. Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R.D. (1996b). MIXREG: a computer program for mixed-effects regression with autocorrelated errors. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 49, 229-252.
11. Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.
12. Kahane, M., & Loftus, G. (1999). Response time versus accuracy in human memory. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.). The Nature of Cognition (pp. 323-384). Cambridge (MA): MIT
13. Lord, F.M., & Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley.
14. Luce, R.D. (1986). Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Maris, E. (1993). Additive and multiplicative models for gamma distributed variables, and their application as models for response times. Psychometrika, 58, 445-469.
16. Marley, A.A.J., & Colonius, H. (1992). The"horse race" random utility model for choice probabilities and reaction times, and its competing risks interpretation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 1-20.
17. Metzler, J., & Shepard, R.N. (1974). Tranformational studies of the internal representation of three-dimensional objects. In R.L. Solso (Ed.). Theories in Cognitive Psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 147-201). Potomac (MD): Erlbaum.
18. Moerbeek, M., Van Breukelen, G., & Berger, M. (2001). Optimal experimental design for multilevel logistic models. The Statistician, 50, 17-30.
19. Moerbeek, M., Van Breukelen, G., & Berger, M. (2003). A comparison of estimation methods for multilevel logistic models. Computational Statistics, 18, 19-38.
20. Pachella, R.G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In B.H. Kantowitz (Ed.). Human Information Processing: Tutorials in Performance and Cognition (pp. 41-82). Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.
21. Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., Healy, M., Woodhouse, G., Draper, D., Langford, I., & Lewis, T. (2000). A User's Guide to MLwiN. Multilevel Models Project, Institute of Education, University of London, Version 2.1.
22. Ratcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: modeling accumulation of partial information. Psychological Review, 95, 238-255.
23. Ratcliff, R., & Smith, PL. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333-367.
24. Rijmen, F., & DeBoeck, P. (2002). The random weights linear logistic test model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 271-285.
25. Shepard, R.N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
26. Snijders, T.A.B., & Bosker, R.J. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage Publications.
27. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
28. Storms, G., & Delbeke, L. (1992). The irrelevance of distributional assumptions on RTs in in multidimensional scaling of same/different tasks. Psychometrika, 57, 599-614.
29. Therneau, T.M., & Grambsch P.M. (2000). Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York: Springer.
30. Thissen, D. (1983). Timed testing: an approach using item response theory. In D.J. Weiss (Ed.), New Horizons in Testing: Latent Trait Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing (pp. 179-203). New York: Academic Press.
31. Thurstone, L.L. (1937). Ability, motivation and speed. Psychometrika, 2, 249-254.
32. Townsend, J.T., & Ashby, F.G. (1983). The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes. Cambridge; University Press.
33. Townsend, J.T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical psychology, 39, 321-359.
34. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J (1993). Information processing models generating lognormally distributed reaction times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 513-525.
35. Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (1989). Concentration, Speed and Precision in Mental Tests: a Psychonometric Approach. PhD thesis, Nijmegen University, The Netherlands.
36. Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (1995a). Psychometric and information processing properties of selected response time models. Psychometrika, 60, 95-113.
37. Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (1995b). Parallel processing models compatible with lognormally distributed response times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 396-399.
38. Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (1997). Separability of item and person parameters in response time models. Psychometrika, 62, 525-544.
39. Van Breukelen, G.J.P, & Roskam, E.E.Ch.I. (1991). A Rasch model for the speed-accuracy tradeoff in time limit tests. In J.P. Doignon & J.C. Falmagne (Eds.). Mathematical Psychology: Current Developments (pp. 251-271). New York: Springer.
40. Van der Linden, W.J., & Hambleton, R.K. (1997). Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. New York: Springer.
41. Van der Linden, W.J., Scrams, D.J., & Schnipke, D.L. (1999). Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195-210.
42. Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. New York: Springer.
43. Verhelst, N.D., Verstralen, H.H.F.M., & Jansen, M.G.H. (1997). A logistic model for time limit tests. In W.J. Van Der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds.). Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (pp. 169-186). New York: Springer.
44. Vorberg, D., & Ulrich, R. (1987). Random search with unequal rates: serial and parallel generalizations of McGill's model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 31, 1-23.
45. Wenger, M.J., & Gibson, B.S. (2004). Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cueing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 708-719.
46. Zwinderman, A.H. (1991). A generalized Rasch model for manifest predictors. Psychometrika, 56, 589-600.