Normal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breast

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1374-1382

  Jansen, Sanaz A ^a,b   Lin, Vicky C ^a   Giger, Maryellen L ^a   Li, Hui ^a   Karczmar, Gregory S ^a   Newstead, Gillian M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Kinetics; Magnetic resonance imaging; Normal; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 79959372883     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2080-z     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. E Warner H Messersmith P Causer A Eisen R Shumak D Plewes 2008 Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer Ann Intern Med 148 671 679 18458280 (Pubitemid 351669112)
2. V Molleran MC Mahoney 2010 The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 18 171 185 10.1016/j.mric.2010.02.001 20494304 10.1016/j.mric.2010.02.001 vii
3. CK Kuhl HB Bieling J Gieseke, et al. 1997 Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency Radiology 203 137 144 9122382 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3jt1CisQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27142721)
4. SO Pfleiderer S Sachse D Sauner, et al. 2004 Changes in magnetic resonance mammography due to hormone replacement therapy Breast Cancer Res 6 R232 R238 10.1186/bcr779 15084246 10.1186/bcr779 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjslymsr8%3D
5. Liu F, Peacock S, DeMartini W, Eby P, Lehman CD (2008) Background parenchymal enhancement on BREAST MRI: characterization and impact on diagnostic accuracy(ed)^(eds). Radiological Society of North America, Chicago
6. Li H, Giger ML, Jansen SA, Lan L, Bhooshan N, Newstead GM (2009) Computerized breast parenchymal analysis on DCE-MRI.(ed)^(eds) SPIE Medical Imaging Conference
7. NF Boyd LJ Martin MJ Yaffe S Minkin 2006 Mammographic density: a hormonally responsive risk factor for breast cancer J Br Menopause Soc 12 186 193 10.1258/136218006779160436 17178021 10.1258/136218006779160436 (Pubitemid 46017608)
8. N Boyd L Martin A Gunasekara, et al. 2009 Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18 1754 1762 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0107 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0107
9. NF Boyd LJ Martin M Bronskill MJ Yaffe N Duric S Minkin 2010 Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 10.1093/jnci/djq239
10. JP Delille PJ Slanetz ED Yeh DB Kopans L Garrido 2005 Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue Breast J 11 4 236 241 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21499.x 15982388 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21499.x (Pubitemid 41026036)
11. M Muller-Schimpfle K Ohmenhauser P Stoll K Dietz CD Claussen 1997 Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast Radiology 203 145 149 9122383 1:STN:280: DyaK2s3jt1Citg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27142722)
12. JD Yager NE Davidson 2006 Estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer N Engl J Med 354 270 282 10.1056/NEJMra050776 16421368 10.1056/NEJMra050776 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xls1KjtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43113032)
13. D Saslow C Boetes W Burke, et al. 2007 American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography CA Cancer J Clin 57 75 89 17392385 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75 (Pubitemid 46535708)
14. SA Jansen A Shimauchi L Zak, et al. 2009 Kinetic curves of malignant lesions are not consistent across MRI systems: need for improved standardization of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition AJR Am J Roentgenol 193 3 832 839 10.2214/AJR.08.2025 19696299 10.2214/AJR.08.2025
15. L Esserman N Hylton T George N Weidner 1999 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to assess tumor histopathology and angiogenesis in breast carcinoma Breast J 5 13 21 11348250 10.1046/j.1524-4741.1999.005001013.x (Pubitemid 29108803)
16. S Holm 1979 A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure Scand J Statist 6 65 70
17. SA Jansen GM Newstead H Abe A Shimauchi RA Schmidt GS Karczmar 2007 Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade Radiology 245 684 691 10.1148/radiol.2453062061 18024450 10.1148/radiol.2453062061 (Pubitemid 350127338)
18. SH Heywang-Kobrunner A Schlegel R Beck, et al. 1993 Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy J Comput Assist Tomogr 17 891 900 8227574 10.1097/00004728-199311000-00009 1:STN:280: DyaK2c%2FksVSjug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23335563)
19. A Wersebe T Xydeas T Clauss, et al. 2001 Quantitative assessment of therapy related effects after breast conserving therapy with dynamic MRI of the breast Rofo 173 1109 1117 10.1055/s-2001-18887 11740672 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MnptlKmtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33151751)
20. RC Boston MD Schnall SA Englander JR Landis PJ Moate 2005 Estimation of the content of fat and parenchyma in breast tissue using MRI T1 histograms and phantoms Magn Reson Imaging 23 591 599 10.1016/j.mri.2005.02.006 15919606 10.1016/j.mri.2005.02.006 (Pubitemid 40779246)
21. K Nie D Chang JH Chen CC Hsu O Nalcioglu MY Su 2010 Quantitative analysis of breast parenchymal patterns using 3D fibroglandular tissues segmented based on MRI Med Phys 37 217 226 20175484 10.1118/1.3271346
22. J Lorenzen R Sinkus M Biesterfeldt G Adam 2003 Menstrual-cycle dependence of breast parenchyma elasticity: estimation with magnetic resonance elastography of breast tissue during the menstrual cycle Invest Radiol 38 236 240 10.1097/01.RLI.0000059544.18910.BD 12649648 (Pubitemid 36384003)
23. SC Partridge GC McKinnon RG Henry NM Hylton 2001 Menstrual cycle variation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured in the normal breast using MRI J Magn Reson Imaging 14 433 438 10.1002/jmri.1204 11599068 10.1002/jmri.1204 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrkvFKqug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32906561)
24. SC Partridge RS Murthy A Ziadloo SW White KH Allison CD Lehman 2010 Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast Magn Reson Imaging 28 3 320 328 10.1016/j.mri.2009.10.003 20061111 10.1016/j.mri.2009.10. 003
25. J Hattangadi C Park J Rembert, et al. 2008 Breast stromal enhancement on MRI is associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy AJR Am J Roentgenol 190 1630 1636 10.2214/AJR.07.2533 18492917 10.2214/AJR.07.2533 (Pubitemid 351798541)
26. C Kuhl 2007 The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice Radiology 244 356 378 10.1148/radiol.2442051620 17641361 10.1148/radiol.2442051620 (Pubitemid 47080868)
27. R Cubuk N Tasali B Narin F Keskiner L Celik S Guney 2010 Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography Radiol Med 115 434 441 10.1007/s11547-010-0513-4 20082222 10.1007/s11547-010-0513-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3czgs1Crsg%3D%3D
28. ES Ko BH Lee HY Choi RB Kim WC Noh 2010 Background enhancement in breast MR: correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasound Eur J Radiol 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.019
29. K Passaperuma E Warner KA Hill A Gunasekara MJ Yaffe 2010 Is mammographic breast density a breast cancer risk factor in women with BRCA mutations? J Clin Oncol 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.5933 20625126
30. N Boyd L Martin S Chavez, et al. 2009 Breast-tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: a cross-sectional study Lancet Oncol 10 569 580 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70078-6 19409844 10.1016/S1470-2045(09) 70078-6
31. M Khazen RM Warren CR Boggis, et al. 2008 A pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17 2268 2274 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2547 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI- 07-2547
32. NA Lee H Rusinek J Weinreb, et al. 1997 Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging AJR Am J Roentgenol 168 501 506 9016235 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7mvVKnsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27051997)
33. DJ Thompson MO Leach G Kwan-Lim, et al. 2009 Assessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: the UK MARIBS study Breast Cancer Res 11 6 R80 10.1186/bcr2447 19903338 10.1186/bcr2447
34. W Chen ML Giger U Bick GM Newstead 2006 Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI Med Phys 33 2878 2887 16964864 10.1118/1.2210568 (Pubitemid 44154559)
35. MJ Collins J Hoffmeister SW Worrell 2006 Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer Semin Ultrasound CT MR 27 351 355 16916003 10.1053/j.sult.2006.05.009 (Pubitemid 44067369)
36. Hologic (2010) Hologic-Quantra Volumetric Assessment. http://www.hologic.com/en/breast-screening/volumetric-assessment/. Accessed January 31, 2011
37. Z Huo ML Giger OI Olopade, et al. 2002 Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers Radiology 225 519 526 12409590 10.1148/radiol.2252010845 (Pubitemid 35239257)
38. H Li ML Giger OI Olopade A Margolis L Lan MR Chinander 2005 Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms Acad Radiol 12 863 873 10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.069 16039540 10.1016/j.acra.2005. 03.069 (Pubitemid 41008679)
39. SA Jansen T Paunesku X Fan, et al. 2009 Ductal carcinoma in situ: x-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model Radiology 253 2 399 406 10.1148/radiol.2533082026 19864527 10.1148/radiol.2533082026
40. JP Delille PJ Slanetz ED Yeh DB Kopans EF Halpern L Garrido 2005 Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: breast tissue perfusion determined with MR imaging-initial observations Radiology 235 36 41 10.1148/radiol. 2351040012 15798166 10.1148/radiol.2351040012 (Pubitemid 40432232)
41. A Heinig D Lampe H Kolbl R Beck SH Heywang-Kobrunner 2002 Suppression of unspecific enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by antiestrogen medication Tumori 88 215 223 12195760 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD38XnslentL8%3D (Pubitemid 34875449)
42. J Lorenzen J Welger BW Lisboa G Krupski G Adam 2003 MR-imaging of the breast at 0.5 Tesla: menstrual-cycle dependency of parenchymal contrast enhancement in healthy volunteers with oral contraceptive use? Rofo 175 502 506 10.1055/s-2003-38449 12677505 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7mtVektQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36512559)
43. JR Reichenbach C Przetak G Klinger WA Kaiser 1999 Assessment of breast tissue changes on hormonal replacement therapy using MRI: a pilot study J Comput Assist Tomogr 23 407 413 10348447 10.1097/00004728-199905000-00015 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ns1ajsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29235154)
44. CL Abitbol BA Warady MD Massie, et al. 1990 Linear growth and anthropometric and nutritional measurements in children with mild to moderate renal insufficiency: a report of the Growth Failure in Children with Renal Diseases Study J Pediatr 116 S46 S54 2405136 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)82925-7 1:STN:280:DyaK3c7jtlajsQ%3D%3D