Motivating lessons: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of content-based instruction on EFL young learners' motivated behaviours and classroom verbal interaction

System

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 186-201

  Huang, Kuei Min ^a,b  

^a CHING YUN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NONE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Classroom verbal interaction; Content based language instruction; EFL young learners; Motivated behaviours

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959332437     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2011.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brindley G. The role of needs analysis in adult ESL programme design. The Second Language Curriculum 1989, 63-78. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R.K. Johnson (Ed.).
2. Brinton D.M., Snow M.A., Wesche J. Content-Based Second Language Instruction 1989, Newbury House, New York.
3. Cheng H.-F., Dörnyei Z. The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: the case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 2007, 1:153-174.
4. Crookes G., Schmidt R.W. Motivation: reopening the Research Agenda. Language Learning 1991, 41(4):469-512.
5. Dörnyei Z. Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching 1998, 31:117-135.
6. Dörnyei Z. Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Ellis R. Understanding Second Language Acquisition 1985, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Ellis R., Basturkmen H., Loewen S. Doing focus on form. System 2002, 30:419-432.
9. Gibbons P. Mediating language learning: teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly 2003, 37(2):247-265.
10. Guilloteaux M.J., Dörnyei Z. Motivating language learners: a classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly 2008, 42(1):55-77.
11. Huang K.M. Impact of Content-Based Language Instruction on EFL Young Learners' Language Development and Learning Motivation 2008, Newcastle University, UK, Unpublished PhD thesis.
12. Izumi S. Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2002, 24:541-577.
13. Julkunen K. Situation- and task-specific motivation in foreign language learning. Motivation and Second Language Acquisition 2001, 29-41. University of Hawaii, Honolulu. Z. Dörnyei, R. Schmidt (Eds.).
14. MacIntyre P.D., Clément R., Dörnyei Z., Noels K.A. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: a situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal 1998, 82:545-562.
15. MacIntyre P.D., Baker S., Clément R., Donovan L.A. Talking in order to learn: willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review 2003, 59:589-607.
16. MacIntyre P.D. Willingness to communicate in the second language: understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. Modern Language Journal 2007, 91:564-576.
17. MacIntyre P.D., Doucette J. Willingness to communicate and action control. System 2010, 38:161-171.
18. Nunan D. The impact of english as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific Region. TESOL Quarterly 2003, 37(4):589-613.
19. Parkinson J. Acquiring scientific literacy through content and genre: a theme-based language course for science students. English for Specific Purposes 2000, 19:369-387.
20. Pinter A. Teaching Young Language Learners 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Richards J.C. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Seedhouse P. The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective 1998, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
23. Spada N., Fröhlich M. COLT Communicative Orientation of Language Teaching Observation Scheme: Coding Conventions and Applications 1995, Macquarie University, National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Sydney, Australia.
24. Swain M. Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Input in Second Language Acquisition 1985, 235-253. Newbury House, Rowley, MA. S.M. Gass, C.G. Madden (Eds.).
25. Swain M., Lapkin S. Talking it through: two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research 2002, 37:285-304.