3D vs. 2D cephalometric analysis comparisons with repeated measurements from 20 Thai males and 20 Thai females

Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Bholsithi, Wisarut ^a   Tharanon, W ^b   Chintakanon, K ^b   Komolpis, R ^b   Sinthanayothin, C ^a  

^a NATIONAL ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY CENTER   (Thailand)

^b NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

3D cephalometric analysis; Cone beam CT; Simplant

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTHROPOLOGY; ARTICLE; ASIAN; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; ORTHODONTICS; THAI; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 71649116059     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18235530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2349/biij.5.4.e21     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Moldez MA, Sato K, Sugawara J et al. Linear and angular filipino cephalometric norms according to age and sex. Angle Orthod 2006; 76(5):800-805 (Pubitemid 44372040)
2. Hamdan AM, Rock WP. Cephalometric norms in an Arabic population. J Orthod 2001; 28(4):297-300.
3. Dechkunakron S, Chaiwat J, Sawaengkit P et al. Thai Adult Norms in Various Lateral Cephalometric Analysis. J Dent Assoc Thai 1994; 44:202-214
4. Kwon TG, Park HS, Ryoo HM et al. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry-a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35(1):43-48
5. Olszewski R, Cosnard G, Macq B et al. 3D CT-based cephalometric analysis: 3D cephalometric theoretical concept and software. Neuroradiology 2006; 48(11):853-862 (Pubitemid 44768858)
6. Adams GL, Gansky SA, Miller AJ et al. Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126(4):397-409.
7. Park SH, Yu HS, Kim KD et al. A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129(5):600.e23-34
8. Bholsithi W, Sinthanayothin C, Chintakanon K et al. Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analysis of 200 Thai Patients. 3rd WACBE Proc, World Congress on Bioeng. 2007.
9. Down Analysis. Sampson WJ ed. Cephalometric Systems Part 3: Analyses. Orthodontic Unit, Department of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, 1995: 28-30.
10. Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M et al. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99(2):212-220
11. Rooppakhun S, Piyasin S, Sitthiseriprati K et al. 3D CT Cephalometric: A Method to Study Cranio-Maxillofacial Deformities. Proceeding of ISBME 2006. 2006: 177-181
12. Frontal Analysis. Sampson WJ ed. Cephalometric Systems Part 3: Analyses. Orthodontic Unit, Department of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, 1995: 86-90.
13. Chintakanon K. A Prospective Study of Twin Block Appliance Therapy in Children with Class II Division1 malocclusions Assessed by MRI, 3D-Cephalometry, and Muscle Testing [thesis for Ph.D]. Dental School, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide South Australia, Australia, 1999.
14. Miyashita K. Contemporary Cephalometric Radiography. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, 1996.
15. Hashim HA, Al-Ghamdi S. Tooth width and arch dimensions in normal and malocclusion samples: an odontometric study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6(2):36-51. (Pubitemid 40944991)