Analysis of masonry structures without box behavior

International Journal of Architectural Heritage

Volumn 5, Issue 4-5, 2011, Pages 369-382

  Lourenço, Paulo B ^a   Mendes, Nuno ^a   Ramos, Luís F ^a   Oliveira, Daniel V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

box behavior; dynamic non linear analysis; masonry structures; pushover analysis; seismic performance

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOLOGY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

BOX BEHAVIOR; DYNAMIC NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS; MASONRY STRUCTURES; PUSH-OVER ANALYSIS; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 79959244862     PISSN: 15583058     EISSN: 15583066     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2010.528824     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brignola, A., S. Podestà, and S. Pampanin. 2008. In-plane stiffness of wooden floor. In Proceedings of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Conference. Canterbury, New Zealand: University of Canterbury.
2. Candeias, P. 2009. Seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings [in Portuguese]. Universidade do Minho Guimaraes Doctoral Dissertation. Guimaraes, Portugual.
3. Candeias, P., A. C. Costa, and E. Coelho. 2004. Shaking table tests of 1:3 reduced scale models of four unreinforced masonry buildings. In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, Canada: University of Vancouver.
4. Carvalho, E. C. 1998. Seismic testing of structures. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake, Paris, France: AA Balkema.
5. Casarotti, C. and R. Pinho. 2007. An adaptive spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 3: 377-390.
6. Casolo S. and F. Peña. 2007. Rigid element model for in-plane dynamics of masonry walls considering hysteretic behaviour and damage. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 21(2):193-211.
7. Chandran, S. 2005. Numerical analysis of monumental structures. Indian Institute of Technology Madras Master's Thesis. Madras, India.
8. Chintanapakdee, C., and A. K. Chopra. 2003. Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 32: 417-442.
9. Chopra, A. K. and R. K. Goel. 2002. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 21: 561-582.
10. DIANA. 2005. DIsplacement method ANAlyser, release 9.1 [CD-ROM]. Delft, The Netherlands: TNO DIANA BV.
11. EN 1998-1. 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: European Commitee for Standardization.
12. Indian Standard. 1983. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures - Part 1. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards.
13. Krstevska, L., Lj, Tashkov, K. Gramatikov, R. Landolfo, O. Mammana. F. Portioli, et al. 2008. Shaking table tests on the large scale model of Mustafa Pasha Mosque without and with FRP. In Structural Analysis of historic construction 383-391. Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC Press/Balkema.
14. Lourenço, P. B., and L. F. Ramos. 2002. Inspection and analysis of a 19th century sanctuary in São Torcato, Portugal. In Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Structural Masonry for the Developing Countries [in Portuguese]. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: CEFET-MG/University of Edinburgh, 351-358.
15. Mendes, N., and P. B. Lourenço. 2008. Reduction of the seismic vulnerability of ancient buildings. Activity report of the project: POCI/ECM/61671/2004, FCT [in Portuguese].
16. Mendes, N., and P. B. Lourenço. 2010. Seismic assessment of masonry Gaioleiros buildings in Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 14(1):80-101. Guimaraes, Portugal: University of Minho.
17. OPCM 3274. 2003. Initial items on the general criteria for seismic classification of the national territory and technical regulations for buildings in earthquake zone. Italian standard. Rome, Italy: Presidency of Ministries Council.
18. Paquette, J., and M. Bruneau. 2000. Pseudo-dynamic testing of an unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragm. In Proceedings of the 12thWorld Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
19. Peña, F., P. B. Lourenço, N. Mendes, and D. V. Oliveira. 2010. Numerical models for the seismic assessment of an old masonry tower. Engineering Structures 32(5):1466-1478.
20. Ramos, L. F. and P. B. Lourenço. 2004. Advanced numerical analysis of historical centers: A case study in Lisbon. Engineering Structures 26:1295-1310.
21. Ramos, L. F., F. Casarin, C. Algeri, and P. B. Lourenço. 2006. Investigation techniques carried out on the Qutb Minar, New Delhi, India. In Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, eds., P. B. Lourenço, P. Roca, C. Modena, and S. K. Agrawal. New Delhi, India: McMillan Publishers, 633-640.
22. Slak, T. and V. Kilar. 2003. Initial conceptual design of earthquake resistant RLC and masonry buildings according to Eurocode 8. In Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures IV. Wessex, UK: WIT Press.
23. Tomaževi¡c, M., M. Lutman, and P. Weiss. 1996. Seismic upgrading of old brick-masonry houses: tying of walls with steel ties. Earthquake Spectra Journal 12(3): 599-622.
24. Yi, T. 2004. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of an unreinforced masonry structure with flexible diaphragms. Georgia Institute of Technology Doctoral Thesis. Atlanta, GA.