Viability selection on body size in a non-marine ostracod

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 671, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 193-203

  Scheihing, Rodrigo ^a,b   Labarca, Pedro ^a   Cardenas, Leyla ^b   Nespolo, Roberto F ^b  

^a CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS CIENTÍFICOS CECS   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Body size; Genetic slippage; Natural selection; Ostracods; Temperature size rule

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; BODY SIZE; FITNESS; LATITUDE; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; NATURAL SELECTION; OSTRACOD; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION BOTTLENECK; POPULATION STRUCTURE; STABILIZATION; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

ALTIPLANO;

CRUSTACEA; LIMNOCYTHERE; OSTRACODA;

EID: 79959223331     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: 15735117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0716-2     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Allen, J. A., 1877. The influence of physical conditions in the genesis of species. Radical Review 1: 108-140.
2. Angilletta, M. J., 2009. Thermal Adaptation. Oxford, New York.
3. Arnold, S. J., R. Burger, P. A. Hohenlohe, B. C. Ajie & A. G. Jones, 2008. Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix. Evolution 62: 2451-2461.
4. Atkinson, D., 1994. Temperature and organism size - a biological law for ectoterms? Advances in Ecological Research 25: 1-58.
5. Atkinson, D. & R. M. Sibly, 1997. Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12: 235-239.
6. Baltanas, A., P. Alcorlo & D. L. Danielopol, 2002. Morphological disparity in populations with and without sexual reproduction: a case study in Eucypris virens (Crustacea: Ostracoda). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 75: 9-19.
7. Benzie, J. A. H., 1989. The distribution and habitat preference of ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda) in a coastal Sand-Dune Lake, Loch of Strathbeg, Northeast Scotland. Freshwater Biology 22: 309-321.
8. Bergmann, C., 1847. Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien 3: 595-708.
9. Bitner-Math, B. C. & L. B. Klaczko, 1999. Heritability, phenotypic and genetic correlation of size and shape of Drosophila mediopunctata wings. Heredity 83: 688-696.
10. Blanckenhorn, W. U., 2000. The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? The Quarterly Reviews of Biology 75: 385-407.
11. Blanckenhorn, W. U. & M. Demont, 2004. Bergmann and converse Bergmann latitudinal clines in arthropods: two ends of a continuum? Integrative and Comparative Biology 44: 413-424.
12. Botquelen, A., R. Gourvennec, A. Loi, G. L. Pillola & F. Leone, 2006. Replacements of benthic associations in a sequence stratigraphic framework, examples from Upper Ordovician of Sardinia and Lower Devonian of the Massif Armoricain. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 239: 286-310.
13. Brehm, V., 1935. Mitteilungen von den Forschungsreisen Prof. Rahms. Mitteilung I Zwei neue Entomostraken aus der Wüste Atacama. Zoologischer Anzeiger 111: 279-284.
14. Brodie, E. D. & F. J. Janzen, 1996. On the assignment of fitness values in statistical analyses of selection. Evolution 50: 437-442.
15. Burtt, E. H. & J. M. Ichida, 2004. Gloger's rule, feather-degrading bacteria, and color variation among song sparrows. Condor 106: 681-686.
16. Butlin, R. K. & P. Menozzi, 2000. Open questions in evolutionary ecology: do ostracods have the answers? Hydrobiologia 419: 1-14.
17. Calder, W. A., 1984. Size, Function and Life Histories. Harvard, New York.
18. Congdon, J., R. Nagle, A. Dunham, C. Beck, O. Kinney & S. Yeomans, 1999. The relationship of body size to survivorship of hatchling snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina): an evaluation of the "bigger is better" hypothesis. Oecologia 121: 224-235.
19. Chaplin, J. A. & D. J. Ayre, 1997. Genetic evidence of widespread dispersal in a parthenogenetic freshwater ostracod. Heredity 78: 57-67.
20. Chaplin, J. A., J. E. Havel & P. D. N. Hebert, 1994. Sex and Ostracods. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9: 435-439.
21. Danielopol, D. L., A. Baltanas, T. Namiotko, W. Geiger, M. Pichler, M. Reina & G. Roidmayr, 2008. Developmental trajectories in geographically separated populations of non-marine ostracods: morphometric applications for palaeoecological studies. Senckenbergiana lethaea 88: 183-193.
22. Daufresne, M., K. Lengfellner & U. Sommer, 2009. Global warming benefits the small in aquatic ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 12788-12793.
23. de Jong, G., 2010. A biophysical interpretation of temperature-dependent body size in Drosophila aldrichi and D-buzzatii. Journal of Thermal Biology 35: 85-99.
24. Dees, N. D., M. Hofmann & S. Bahar, 2010. Physical constraints and the evolution of different foraging strategies in aquatic space. Animal Behavior 79: 603-611.
25. Deng, H. W. & M. Lynch, 1996. Change of genetic architecture in response to sex. Genetics 143: 203-212.
26. Dibattista, J., K. Feldheim, S. Gruber & A. P. Hendry, 2006. When the bigger is not better: selection against large size, high condition and fast growth in juvenile lemon sharks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 201-212.
27. Dibattista, J. D., K. A. Feldheim, S. H. Gruber & A. P. Hendry, 2007. When bigger is not better: selection against large size, high condition and fast growth in juvenile lemon sharks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 201-212.
28. Ellegren, H. & B. C. Sheldon, 2008. Genetic basis of fitness differences in natural populations. Nature 452: 169-175.
29. Fairbairn, D. J. & J. P. Reeve, 2001. Natural selection. In Fox, C. W., D. Roff & D. J. Fairbairn (eds), Evolutionary Ecology. Oxford, New York: 29-43.
30. Falconer, D. S. & T. F. C. Mackay, 1997. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, Edinburgh.
31. Ferguson, S. H., 2000. Predator size and distance to edge: is bigger better? Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 713-720.
32. Franken, R. J. M., J. J. P. Gardeniers, J. A. J. Beijer & E. Peeters, 2008. Variation in stonefly (Nemoura cinerea Retzius) growth and development in response to hydraulic and substrate conditions. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27: 176-185.
33. Gabor, C. R., 1995. Correlational test of Mathis' hypothesis that bigger salamanders have better territories. Copeia 3: 729-735.
34. Gaillard, J. M., M. Festa-Bianchet, D. Delorme & J. Jorgenson, 2000. Body mass and individual fitness in female ungulates: bigger is not always better. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 267: 471-477.
35. Gloger, C. L., 1833. Das Abändern der Vögel durch Einfluss des Klimas. August Schulz, Breslau.
36. Halkett, F., J. C. Simon & F. Balloux, 2005. Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 194-201.
37. Hoffman, A. A., 2000. Laboratory and field heritabilities. Some lessons from Drosophila. In Mousseau, T. A., B. Sinervo & J. Endler (eds) Adaptive Genetic Variation in the Wild. Oxford University Press, New York: 200-218.
38. Holmes, J. A., & A. R. Chivas, 2002. The ostracoda: applications in quaternary research - introduction. In Holmes, J. A. & A. R. Chivas (eds), The Ostracoda: Applications in Quaternary Research. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC: 1-4.
39. Hull, S. L. & D. Rollinson, 2000. Clonal diversity and rockpool size in the marine ostracod, Callistocythere badia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80: 551-552.
40. Hunt, G. & K. Roy, 2006. Climate change, body size evolution, and Cope's Rule in deep-sea ostracodes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 1347-1352.
41. Jones, A. G., S. J. Arnold & R. Burger, 2003. Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57: 1747-1760.
42. Knapp, R. A. & R. R. Warner, 1991. Male parental care and female choice in the bicolor damselfish, Stegastes partitus - bigger is not always better. Animal Behaviour 41: 747-756.
43. Kingsolver, J. G. & R. B. Huey, 2008. Size, temperature, and fitness: three rules. Evolutionary Ecology Research 10: 251-268.
44. Kozlowski, J., 1992. Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction: implications for age and size at maturity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7: 15-19.
45. Lande, R. & S. J. Arnold, 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
46. Lerner-Seggev, R., 1973. Limnocythere titicaca, a new species (Ostracoda) (Cytheridae) from Lake Titicaca, Bolivia. Crustaceana 25: 88-94.
47. Lighton, J. R. B., M. C. Quinlan & D. H. Feener, 1994. Is bigger better - water-balance in the polymorphic desert harvester ant Messor Pergandei. Physiological Entomology 19: 325-334.
48. Litvak, M. K. & W. C. Leggett, 1992. Age and size-selective predation on larval fishes - the bigger-is-better hypothesis revisited. Marine Ecology Progress Series 81: 13-24.
49. Lynch, M. & H. W. Deng, 1994. Genetic slippage in response to sex. The American Naturalist 144: 242-261.
50. MacNulty, D. R., D. W. Smith, L. D. Mech & L. E. Eberly, 2009. Body size and predatory performance in wolves: is bigger better? Journal of Animal Ecology 78: 532-539.
51. Majoran, S., S. Agrenius & M. Kucera, 2000. The effect of temperature on valves size and growth rate in Krithe praetexta praetexta (Sars). Hydrobiologia 419: 141-148.
52. Mascitti, V. & F. O. Kravetz, 2002. Bill morphology of South American Flamingos. Condor 104: 73-83.
53. McDonald, P. G., P. D. Olsen & A. Cockburn, 2005. Selection on body size in a raptor with pronounced reversed sexual size dimorphism: are bigger females better? Behavioral Ecology 16: 48-56.
54. Meekan, M. G., L. Vigliola, A. Hansen, P. J. Doherty, A. Halford & J. H. Carleton, 2006. Bigger is better: size-selective mortality throughout the life history of a fast-growing clupeid, Spratelloides gracilis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 317: 237-244.
55. Meyer, J., 1992. Bigger is not necessarily better. American Bee Journal 132: 215-217.
56. Mousseau, T. A. & D. A. Roff, 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59: 181-197.
57. Nespolo, R. F., D. M. Bustamante, L. D. Bacigalupe & F. Bozinovic, 2005. Quantitative genetics of bioenergetics and growth-related traits in the wild mammal, Phyllotis darwini. Evolution 59: 1829-1837.
58. Pérez, L., J. Lorenschat, M. Brenner, B. Scharf & A. Schwalb, 2010. Extant freshwater ostracodes (Crustacea: Ostracoda) from Lago Petén Itzá, Guatemala. Revista de Biología Tropical 58: 871-895.
59. Peters, R. H., 1983. The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
60. Pfrender, M. E. & M. Lynch, 2000. Quantitative genetic variation in Daphnia: temporal changes in genetic architecture. Evolution 54: 1502-1509.
61. Pureswaran, D. S. & J. H. Borden, 2003. Is bigger better? Size and pheromone production in the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 16: 765-782.
62. Reale, D., M. Festa-Bianchet & J. T. Jorgenson, 1999. Heritability of body mass varies with age and season in wild bighorn sheep. Heredity 83: 526-532.
63. Roberts, J. H., J. A. Holmes & A. R. H. Swan, 2002. Ecophenotypy in Limnocythere inopinata (Ostracoda) from the late Holocene of Kajemarum Oasis (north-eastern Nigeria). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 185: 41-52.
64. Roff, D. A., 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman & Hall, Montreal.
65. Roff, D. A., 2000. The evolution of the G-matrix: selection or drift? Heredity 84: 135-142.
66. Rossi, V., A. Piotti, A. Baltanas, G. Benassi & P. Menozzi, 2008. Genetic diversity and mixed reproduction in Eucypris virens (Crustacea: Ostracoda). Fundamental and Applied Limnology 172: 147-159.
67. Sadowski, J. A., A. J. Moore & E. D. Brodie, 1999. The evolution of empty nuptial gifts in a dance fly, Empis snoddyi (Diptera: Empididae): bigger isn't always better. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 45: 161-166.
68. Schlupp, I., R. McKnab & M. J. Ryan, 2001. Sexual harassment as a cost for molly females: bigger males cost less. Behaviour 138: 277-286.
69. Schluter, D., 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42: 849-861.
70. Schmidt-Nielsen, K., 1975. Scaling in biology: the consequences of size. Journal of Experimental Zoology 194: 287-308.
71. Schon, I., A. Gandolfi, E. Di Masso, V. Rossi, H. I. Griffiths, K. Martens & R. K. Butlin, 2000. Persistence of asexuality through mixed reproduction in Eucypris virens (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Heredity 84: 161-169.
72. Serrat, M. A., D. King & C. O. Lovejoy, 2008. Temperature regulates limb length in homeotherms by directly modulating cartilage growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 19348-19353.
73. Smith, R. J. & T. Kamiya, 2003. The ontogeny of Loxoconcha japonica Ishizaki, 1968 (Cytheroidea, Ostracoda, Crustacea). Hydrobiologia 490: 31-52.
74. Smith, R. J. & K. Martens, 2000. The ontogeny of the cypridid ostracod Eucypris virens (Jurine, 1820) (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Hydrobiologia 419: 31-63.
75. Stearns, S. C., 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
76. Steer, M. A., G. T. Pecl & N. A. Moltschaniwskyj, 2003. Are bigger calamary Sepioteuthis australis hatchlings more likely to survive? A study based on statolith dimensions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 261: 175-182.
77. Topping, M. G. & J. S. Millar, 1999. Mating success of male bushy-tailed woodrats: when bigger is not always better. Behavioral Ecology 10: 161-168.
78. van Valkenburgh, B., X. M. Wang & J. Damuth, 2004. Cope's rule, hypercarnivory, and extinction in North American canids. Science 306: 101-104.
79. Warren, M., M. A. McGeoch, S. W. Nicolson & S. L. Chown, 2006. Body size patterns in Drosophila inhabiting a mesocosm: interactive effects of spatial variation in temperature and abundance. Oecologia 149: 245-255.
80. Yin, Y., W. Geiger & K. Martens, 1999. Effects of genotype and environment on phenotypic variability in Limnocythere inopinata (Crustacea: Ostracoda). Hydrobiologia 400: 85-114.
81. Yo, K., 2000. The origins of modern nonmarine ostracod faunas: evidence from the Late Cretaceous and Early Palaeogene of Mongolia. Hydrobiologia 419: 119-124.
82. Zamudio, K. R., R. B. Huey & W. D. Crill, 1995a. Bigger isn't always better: body size, developmental and parental temperature, and male territorial success in Drosophila melanogster. Animal Behaviour 49: 671-677.