A semantic approach to textual entailment: System evaluation and task analysis

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 10-15

  Burchardt, Aljoscha ^a   Reiter, Nils ^a   Thater, Stefan ^a   Frank, Anette ^b  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEEP LEARNING; JOB ANALYSIS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

COMPONENT BASED; DATA SET; LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS; OVERALL ACCURACIES; PERFORMANCE; SEMANTIC APPROACH; SYSTEM EVALUATION; TASK ANALYSIS; TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84862298468     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Collin F. Baker, Charles J. Fillmore, and John B. Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet project. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL, Montreal, Canada.
2. Roy Bar-Haim, Ido Dagan, Bill Dolan, Lisa Ferro, Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini, and Idan Szpektor, editors. 2006. Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Venice, Italy.
3. Johan Bos and Katja Markert. 2006. When logical inference helps determining textual entailment (and when it doesn’t). In Proceedings of PASCAL RTE2 Workshop.
4. Aljoscha Burchardt and Anette Frank. 2006. Approximating Textual Entailment with LFG and FrameNet Frames. In Proceedings of PASCAL RTE2 Workshop.
5. Aljoscha Burchardt, Katrin Erk, and Anette Frank. 2005. A WordNet Detour to FrameNet. In B. Fisseni, H.-C. Schmitz, B. Schröder, and P. Wagner, editors, Sprachtechnologie, mobile Kommunikation und linguistische Resourcen, volume 8 of Computer Studies in Language and Speech. Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Main.
6. Katrin Erk and Sebastian Pado. 2006. Shalmaneser - a flexible toolbox for semantic role assignment. In Proceedings of LREC 2006, Genoa, Italy.
7. Christiane Fellbaum. 1997. English verbs as semantic net. In WordNet: an electronic lexical database. MIT.
8. Andrew Hickl, Jeremy Bensley, John Williams, Kirk Roberts, Bryan Rink, and Ying Shi. 2006. Recognizing Textual Entailment with LCC’s Groundhog System. In Proceedings of PASCAL RTE2 Workshop.
9. Ian Niles and Adam Pease. 2001. Towards a standard upper ontology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS), pages 2–9. ACM Press.
10. Nils Reiter. 2007. Towards linking FrameNet and SUMO. Diploma Thesis (in preparation).
11. Stefan Riezler, Tracy H. King, Ronald M. Kaplan, Richard Crouch, John T. III Maxwell, and Mark Johnson. 2002. Parsing the Wall Street Journal using a Lexical-Functional Grammar and Discriminative Estimation Techniques. In Proceedings of ACL’02, Philadelphia, PA.
12. Ulrich Schäfer, 2005. Heart of Gold, User and Developer Documentation. DFKI Language Technology Lab, Saarbrücken, Germany.
13. Helmut Schmid. 1994. Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, Manchester, UK.
14. Ian H. Witten and Eibe Frank. 2005. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2 edition.
15. Annie Zaenen, Lauri Karttunen, and Richard Crouch. 2005. Local textual inference: Can it be defined or circumscribed? In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June.