Genotype by environment interactions and yield stability of stem borer resistant maize hybrids in kenya

African Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 10, Issue 23, 2011, Pages 4752-4758

  Beyene, Yoseph ^a   Mugo, Stephen ^a   Mutinda, Charles ^b   Tefera, Tadele ^a   Karaya, Haron ^a   Ajanga, Sammy ^b   Shuma, Jackson ^b   Tende, Regina ^b   Kega, Vincent ^b  

^a INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Kenya)

^b KENYA AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Genotype x environment (G x E) interactions; Maize; Stability; Stem borer resistant hybrids

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BUSSEOLA FUSCA; CHILO PARTELLUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROP MANAGEMENT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GRAIN YIELD; KENYA; MAIZE; NONHUMAN; PEST RESISTANCE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT HEIGHT; PLANT INSECT INTERACTION; PLANT RESPONSE; PLANT YIELD; STEM BORER;

BUSSEOLA FUSCA; CHILO PARTELLUS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 79958844294     PISSN: 16845315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Burgueño J, Crossa J, Vargas M (2003). SAS programs for graphing GE and GGE biplots: Downloaded from http://www.Cimmyt.org/Research/ Biometrics/bsu.htm.
2. Butron A, Velasco P, Orda ́ sA, Malvar R (2004). Yield evaluation of maize cultivars across environments with different levels of pink stem borer infestation. Crop Sci. 44: 741-747.
3. Butron A, Widstrom N, Snook M, Wiseman B (2002). Recurrent selection for corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance in three closely related corn southern synthetics. J. Econ. Entomol. 95: 458-462.
4. Cornelius P, Crossa J, Seyedsader M (1996). Statistical test and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype-by-environment interaction. In Kang MS, Gauch HG (eds.): Genotype-by-environment interaction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 199-234.
5. Crossa J (1990). Statistical analyses of multilocation trials. Adv. Agron. 44: 55-85.
6. Crossa J, Cornelius P (1997). Sites regression and shifted multiplicative model clustering of cultivar trial sites under heterogeneity of error variances. Crop Sci. 37: 406-415.
7. Crossa J, Cornelius P, Yan W (2002). Biplots of linear bilinear models for studying crossover genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci. 42: 619-633.
8. De Groote H (2002). Maize yield losses from stem borers in Kenya. Insect Sci. Appl. 22: 89-96.
9. Eberhart S, Russell W (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36-40.
10. Epinat-Le Signor C, Dousse S, Lorgeou J, Denis J, Bon-homme R, Carolo P, Charcosset A (2001). Interpretation of Genotype x environment interactions for early maize hybrids over 12 years. Crop Sci. 41: 663-669.
11. Gabriel K (1971). The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58: 453-467.
12. García-Martí F, Comelles C, Pérez F (1996). Las plagas agrícolas. Phytoma 1
13. Lee E, Doerksen T, Kannenberg L (2003). Genetic components of yield stability in maize breeding populations. Crop Sci 43: 2018-2027.
14. th November-3rd December 1994, pp. 156.
15. Mihm JA (1989). Insect resistant maize. Recent advances and utilization. In CIMMYT (ed.): Toward insect resistance maize for the Third World: Proceedings of the International Symposium on methodologies for Developing Host Plant Resistance to Maize Insects. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT, pp. 175.
16. Mugo S, Bergvinson D, Hoisington D (2001). Options in developing stem borer-resistant maize: CIMMYT approaches and experiences. Insect Sci. Appl. 21: 409-415.
17. Nyhus K, Russell W, Guthrie W (1989). Changes in agronomic traits associated with recurrent selection in two corn synthetics. Crop Sci 29: 269-275.
18. Pingali P (2001). CIMMYT 1999-2000 World maize facts and trends. Meeting world maize needs: Technological opportunities and priorities for the private sector. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.
19. Pixely K, Bjarnason M (2002). Stability of grain yield, endosperm modification, and protein quality of hybrid and open-pollinated quality protein maize (QPM) cultivars 2002. Crop Sci. 42: 1882-1890.
20. Russell W, Lawrance G, Guthrie W (1979). Effects of recurrent selection for European corn borer resistance on other agronomic characters in synthetic cultivars of corn. Maydica 24: 33-47.
21. SAS (2003). SAS ® 9.1 for Windows. Cary, NC,: SAS Institute Inc.
22. Smith M, Mihm J, Jewell D (1989). Breeding for multiple resistance to temperate, sub-tropical, and tropical maize insect pests at CIMMYT: Toward insect resistant maize for the third world. Proceedings of the international symposium on methodologies for developing host plant resistance to maize insects. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT, pp. 222-234.
23. Van Eeuwijk F, Keizer L, Bekker J (1995). Linear and bilinear models for the analysis of multi-environment trials: II. An application to data from the Dutch maize variety trials. Euphytica 84: 9-22.
24. Yan W, Hunt L, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci 40: 597-605.
25. Yau S (1995). Regression and AMMI analyses of genotype x environment interactions: An empirical comparison. Agron. J. 87: 121-126.