Yield evaluation of maize cultivars across environments with different levels of pink stem borer infestation

Crop Science

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 741-747

  Butron A ^a   Velasco, P ^a   Ordas A ^a   Malvar, R A ^a  

^a MISIÓN BIOLÓGICA DE GALICIA CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEXAPODA; INSECTA; SESAMIA; SESAMIA NONAGRIOIDES; ZEA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 2442602399     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.7410     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anglade, P. 1961. Influence sur le rendement du maïs de l'infestation des tiges par la deuxième génération de la Sésamie (Sesamia non-agrioides Lef. Lep. Noctuidae). Méthodes de comparaison des hybrides par infestation artificielle. Ann. Epiph. 12:357-372.
2. Anglade, P. 1972. Les sesamia. p. 1389-1400. In A.S. Balachowsky (ed.) Entomologie appliquée à l'agriculture. II, Lépidoptè res, II. Masson et Cie, Paris.
3. Argillier, O., Y. Hébert, and Y. Barrière. 1994. Statistical analysis and interpretation of line x environment interaction for biomass yield in maize. Agronomie 14:661-672.
4. Baril, C.P. 1992. Factor regression for interpreting genotype-environment interaction in bread-wheat trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:1022-1026.
5. Baril, C.P., J.-B. Denis, R. Wustman, and F.A. van Eeuwijk. 1995. Analysing genotype by environment interaction in Dutch potato variety trials using factorial regression. Euphytica 82:149-155.
6. Biarnès-Dumoulin, V., J.-B. Denis, I. Lejeune-Hénaut, and G. Etévé. 1996. Interpreting yield instability in pea using genotypic and environmental covariates. Crop Sci. 36:115-120.
7. Brancourt-Hulmel, M., V. Biarnès-Dumoulin, and J.B. Denis. 1997. Points de repère dans l'analyse de la stabilité et de l'interaction génotype-milieu en amélioration des plantes. Agronomie 17:219-246.
8. Burgueño, J., J. Crossa, and M. Vargas. 2003. SAS programs for graphing GE and GGE biplots. Downloaded from http://www.Cimmyt.org/ Research/Biometrics/bsu.htm; verified 15 January 2004.
9. Butrón, A., R.A. Malvar, P. Velasco, P. Revilla, and A. Ordás. 1998. Defense mechanisms of maize against pink stem borer. Crop Sci. 38:1159-1163.
10. Butrón, A., R.A. Malvar, P. Velasco, M.I. Vales, and A. Ordás. 1999. Combining abilities for maize stem antibiosis, yield loss, and yield under infestation and no infestation with pink stem borer attack. Crop Sci. 39:691-696.
11. Butrón, A., N.W. Widstrom, M.E. Snook, and B.R. Wiseman. 2002. Recurrent selection for corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance in three closely related corn southern synthetics. J. Econ. Entomol. 95:458-462.
12. Cochran, W.G., and G.M. Cox. 1957. Experimental designs. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
13. Cordero, A., R.A. Malvar, A. Butrón, P. Velasco, P. Revilla, and A. Ordás. 1998. Population dynamics and life-cycle of corn borers in South Atlantic European coast (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Pyralidae). Maydica 43:5-12.
14. Cornelius, P.L., J. Crossa, and M.S. Seyedsader. 1996. Statistical test and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype-by-environment interaction. p. 199-234. In M.S. Kang and H.G. Gauch (ed.) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
15. Crossa, J. 1990. Statistical analyses of multilocation trials. Adv. Agron. 44:55-85.
16. Crossa, J., and P.L. Cornelius. 1997. Sites regression and shifted multiplicative model clustering of cultivar trial sites under heterogeneity of error variances. Crop Sci. 37:406-415.
17. Crossa, J., P.L. Cornelius, and W. Yan. 2002. Biplots of linear-bilinear models for studying crossover genotype x environment interaction. Crop Sci. 42:619-633.
18. Decoux, G., and J.B. Denis. 1991. INTERA. Logiciels pour l'interprétation statistique de l'interaction entre deux facteurs. Laboratoire de Biométrie, INRA, Route de Saint-Cyr F78026, Versailles, France.
19. Denis, J.B. 1980. Analyse de régression factorielle. Biom. Praxim. 20:1-34.
20. Denis, J.B. 1988. Two way analysis using covariates. Statistics 19:123-132.
21. Dicke, F.F., and W.D. Guthrie. 1988. The most important corn insects. p. 767-867. In G.F. Sprague and J.W. Dudley (ed.) Corn and corn improvement. Agron. Monogr. 18. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
22. Epinat-Le Signor, C., S. Dousse, J. Lorgeou, J.B. Denis, R. Bonhomme, P. Carolo, and A. Charcosset. 2001. Interpretation of genotype x environment interactions for early maize hybrids over 12 years. Crop Sci. 41:663-669.
23. Gabriel, K.R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58:453-467.
24. Galichet, P.F. 1982. Hibernation d'une population de Sesamia nonagrioides Lef. (Lép. Noctuidae) en France méridionale. Agronomie 2: 561-566.
25. García-Martí, F., J. Costa Comelles, and F. Pérez. 1996. Las plagas agrícoles. Phytoma 16.
26. Hébert, Y., C. Plomion, and N. Harzic. 1995. Genotype x environment interaction for root traits in maize, as analyzed with factorial regression models. Euphytica 81:85-92.
27. Hilal, A. 1981. Etude du développement de Sesamia nonagrioides et établissement de modèles pour la prévision de ses populations dans la nature. Bull. OEPP 11:107-112.
28. Klenke, J.R., W.A. Russell, W.D. Guthrie, and O.S. Smith. 1988. Inbreeding depression and gene frequency changes for agronomic traits in corn synthetic selected for resistance to European corn borer. J. Agric. Entomol. 5:225-233.
29. Larue, P. 1984. La Sésamie du maïs (Sesamia nonagrioides Lef.) dégâts et actualisation de la lutte. La Défense des Végétaux 227:163-179.
30. Lynch, R.E. 1980. European corn borer: Yield loss in relation to hybrid and stage of corn development. J. Econ. Entomol. 73:159-164.
31. Moreno-Gonzâlez, J. 1988. Variétés de maïs adaptées au nord-ouest de l'Espagne. Phosphore Agric. 80:55-62.
32. Nyhus, K.A., W.A. Russell, and W.D. Guthrie. 1989. Changes in agronomic traits associated with recurrent selection in two corn synthetics. Crop Sci. 29:269-275.
33. Revilla, P., R.A. Malvar, M.E. Cartea, A. Butron, and A. Ordás. 2000. Inheritance of cold tolerance at emergence and during early season growth in maize. Crop Sci. 40:1579-1585.
34. Russell, W.A., G.D. Lawrance, and W.D. Guthrie. 1979. Effects of recurrent selection for European corn borer resistance on other agronomic characters in synthetic cultivars of corn. Maydica 24: 33-47.
35. SAS. 2000. The SAS System. SAS online doc. HTML format version eight SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
36. Van Eeuwijk, F.A., L.C.P. Keizer, and J.J. Bakker. 1995. Linear and bilinear models for the analysis of multi-environment trials: II. An application to data from the Dutch maize variety trials. Euphytica 84:9-22.
37. Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng, and Z. Szlavnics. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40:597-605.
38. Vargas, M., J. Crossa, K.D. Sayre, M.P. Reynolds, M.E. Ramirez, and M. Talbot. 1998. Interpreting genotype x environment interaction in wheat by partial least squares regression. Crop Sci. 38:679-689.