HPSG parsing with shallow dependency constraints

ACL 2007 - Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 624-631

  Sagae, Kenji ^a   Miyao, Yusuke ^a   Tsujii, Jun'ichi ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c National Center for Text Mining   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPENDENCY CONSTRAINTS; DEPENDENCY PARSING; HIGH-ACCURACY; STATE-OF-THE-ART APPROACH; SURFACE-SYNTACTIC PARSING; SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS; SYNTACTIC PARSING;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 79958834070     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Srinivas Bangalore and Aravind K. Joshi. 1999. Supertagging: an approach to almost parsing. Computational Linguistics, 25(2):237-265.
2. A. Berger, S. A. Della Pietra, and V. J. Della Pietra. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 22(1):39-71.
3. Joan Bresnan. 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. MIT Press.
4. Sabine Buchholz and Erwin Marsi. 2006. Conll-x shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Natural Language Learning. New York, NY.
5. M. Collins. 1999. Head-Driven Models for Natural Language Parsing. Phd thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
6. Berthold Crysmann, Anette Frank, Bernd Kiefer, Stefan Mueller, Guenter Neumann, Jakub Piskorski, Ulrich Schaefer, Melanie Siegel, Hans Uszkoreit, Feiyu Xu, Markus Becker, and Hans-Ulrich Krieger. 2002. An integrated architecture for shallow and deep processing. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2002).
7. Michael Daum, Kilian A. Foth, and Wolfgang Menzel. 2003. Constraint-based integration of deep and shallow parsing techniques. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2003).
8. Jason Eisner. 1996. Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96). Copenhagen, Denmark.
9. Anette Frank, Markus Becker, Berthold Crysmann, Bernd Kiefer, and Ulrich Schaefer. 2003. Integrated shallow and deep parsing: TopP meets HPSG. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2003), pages 104-111.
10. Stephen Clark James R. Curran and David Vadas. 2006. Multi-tagging for lexicalized-grammar parsing. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL 2006. Sydney, Australia.
11. Robert Malouf. 2002. A comparison of algorithms for maximum entropy parameter estimation. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Natural Language Learning.
12. M. P. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. A. Marcinkiewics. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19.
13. Ryan McDonald, Fernando Pereira, K. Ribarov, and J. Hajic. 2005. Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technologies/Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT-EMNLP). Vancouver, Canada.
14. Yusuke Miyao and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2005. Probabilistic disambiguation models for wide-coverage hpsg parsing. In Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Ann Arbor, MI.
15. Yusuke Miyao, Takashi Ninomiya, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2003. Corpus oriented grammar development for aquiring a head-driven phrase structure grammar from the penn treebank. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Natural Language Learning.
16. T. Ninomiya, T. Matsuzaki, Y. Tsuruoka, Y. Miyao, and J. Tsujii. 2006. Extremely lexicalized models for accurate and fast hpsg parsing. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods for Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2006).
17. Joakim Nivre and Mario Scholz. 2004. Deterministic dependency parsing of english text. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 64-70. Geneva, Switzerland.
18. J. Nivre, J. Hall, J. Nilsson, G. Eryigit, and S. Marinov. 2006. Labeled pseudo-projective dependency parsing with support vector machines. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Natural Language Learning. New York, NY.
19. C. Pollard and I. A. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press.
20. Kenji Sagae and Alon Lavie. 2005. A classifier-based parser with linear run-time complexity. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Parsing Technologies. Vancouver, BC.
21. Kenji Sagae and Alon Lavie. 2006. Parser combination by reparsing. In Proceedings of the 2006 Meeting of the North American ACL. New York, NY.
22. Yves Schabes, Anne Abeille, and Aravind Joshi. 1988. Parsing strategies with lexicalized grammars: Application to tree adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of 12th COLING.
23. Mark Steedman. 2000. The Syntactic Process. MIT Press.
24. Daniel Zeman and Zdenek Žabokrtský. 2005. Improving parsing accuracy by combining diverse dependency parsers. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Parsing Technologies. Vancouver, Canada.