Clinician knowledge about use of intrauterine devices in adolescents in South Carolina AHEC

Family Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 407-411

  Diaz, Vanessa A ^a   Hughes, Nikki ^a   Dickerson, Lori M ^a   Wessell, Andrea M ^a   Carek, Peter J ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICINE; PARITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT MEDICINE; ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; MALE; PARITY; SEX FACTORS; SOUTH CAROLINA;

EID: 79958831689     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Stats. www.cdc.gov/nchs/vitalstats.htm. Febuary 2008.
2. Guttmacher Institute. US teenage pregnancies, births, and abortions: national and state trends and trends by race and ethnicity. January 2010. Accessed April 7, 2010 at www.guttmacher.org/pubs/USTPtrends.pdf.
3. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006;38(2):90-6.
4. Stevens-Simon C, Kelly L, Kulick R. A village would be nice but... it takes a long-acting contraceptive to prevent repeat adolescent pregnancies. Am J Prev Med 2001;21(1):60-5.
5. Mosher WD, Martinez GM, Chandra A, Abma JC, Willson SJ. Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002. Adv Data 2004;350:1-36.
6. Hubacher D, Vilchez R, Gmach R, et al. The impact of clinician education on IUD uptake, knowledge, and attitudes: results of a randomized trial. Contraception 2006;73(6):628-33.
7. Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of US women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 23 2005;25:1-160.
8. Rubin SE, Fletcher J, Stein T, Gold M, Segall-Gutierrez P. Underuse of the IUD in contraceptive care and training. Fam Med 2010; 42(6):387-8.
9. Kooiker CH, Scutchfield FD. Barriers to prescribing the Copper T 380A intrauterine device by physicians. West J Med 1990;153(3):279-82.
10. Harper CC, Blum M, de Bocanegra HT, et al. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111(6):1359-69.
11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Intrauterine device and adolescents. ACOG Committee Opinion No 392, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1493-5.
12. World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, third edition. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2004.
13. Kelly EK, Rudinsky SW. Intrauterine contraception: current evidence-based recommendations: indications and contraindications to IUD use. J Midwifery Womens Health 2007;52(5):505-7.
14. Godfrey EM, Memmel LM, Neustadt A, et al. Intrauterine contraception for adolescents aged 14-18 years: a multicenter randomized pilot study of Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to the Copper T 380A. Contraception 2010;81(2):123-7.
15. Deans EI, Grimes DA. Intrauterine devices for adolescents: a systematic review. Contraception 2009;79:418-23.
16. Brockmeyer A, Kishen M, Webb A. Experience of IUD/IUS insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women-a pilot study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2008;13:248-54.
17. Yen S, Saah T, Hillard PJ. IUDs and adolescents-an under-utilized opportunity for pregnancy prevention. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2010;23(3):121-2.
18. Stanwood NL, Garrett JM, Konrad TR. Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99(2):275-80.
19. Madden T, Allsworth JE, Hladky KJ, Secura GM, Peipert JF. Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes. Contraception 2010;81(2):112-6.
20. Carek PJ, Abercrombie S, Baughman O, et al. SC AHEC family practice residency program graduates: where are they, who do they serve, and what services do they provide? J SC Med Assoc 2005;101:100-3.
21. Stubbs E, Schamp A. The evidence is in. Why are IUDs still out? Can Fam Physician 2008; 54(4):560-6.
22. Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician 1998; 52:119-26.
23. Lyus R, Lohr P, Prager S. Use of the Mirena LNG-IUS and Paragard CuT380A intrauterine devices in nulliparous women. Board of the Society of Family Planning Contraception 2010;81(5):367-71.
24. Farmer M, Webb A. Intrauterine device inserted-related complications: can they be predicted? J Fam Plann Reprod Healthcare 2003; 29(4):277-81.
25. Saav I, Aronsson A, Marions L, Stephansson O, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2007; 22(10):2647-52.
26. Stanwood NL, Bradley KA. Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1417-22.
27. Wellings K, Zhihong Z, Krentel A, Barretta G, Glasier A. Attitudes towards long-acting reversible methods of contraception in general practice in the UK. Contraception 2007;76(3):208-14.
28. Weiss E, Moore K. An assessment of the quality of information available on the Internet about the IUD and the potential impact on contraceptive choices. Contraception 2003; 68(5):359-64.