New Research

Family Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 387-388

  Rubin, Susan E ^a   Fletcher, Jason ^a   Stein, Tara ^a   Gold, Marji ^a   Segall Gutierrez, Penina ^b  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;

EID: 77953566241     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Hatcher R, Trussell J, Nelson A, Cates W, Stewart F. Contraceptive technology, 19th edition. New York: Ardent Media, 2008.
2. Stubbs E, Schamp A. The evidence is in. Why are IUDs still out? Family physicians' perceptions of risk and indications. Can Fam Physician 2008;54(4):560-6.
3. Stanwood N.L, Garrett J.M, Konrad T.R. Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:275-80.
4. Harper C.C, Blum M, de Bocanegra H.T., et al. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contracep-tion. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1359-69.
5. Steinauer J.E, DePineres T, Robert A.M, West-fall J, Darney P. Training family practice residents in abortion and other reproductive health care: a nationwide survey. [see com-ment]. Fam Plann Perspect 1997;29:222-7.