'Just being selfish for my own sake...': Balancing the views of young adults with intellectual disabilities and their carers in transition planning

Sociological Review

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 303-323

  Pilnick, Alison ^a   Clegg, Jennifer ^a   Murphy, Elizabeth ^a   Almack, Kathryn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958781235     PISSN: 00380261     EISSN: 1467954X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02006.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allan, J. and Brown, S., (2001), Special Schools and Inclusion, Educational Review, 53 (2): 199-207.
2. Antaki, C., (2001), 'D'you like a drink?' Dissembling language and the construction of an impoverished life, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20: 196-213.
3. Antaki, C., (1999), Interviewing persons with a learning disability, Qualitative Health Research, 9: 437-54.
4. Atkinson J.M. and Heritage, J., (eds) (1984), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Barton, E.L., (2000), The interactional practices of referrals and accounts in medical discourse: Expertise and compliance, Discourse Studies, 2 (3): 259-281.
6. Bolden, G., (2006), Little words that matter: discourse markers 'So' and 'Oh' and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction, Journal of Communication, 56 (4): 661-688.
7. Burton, M. and Kagan, C., (2006), Decoding Valuing People, Disability and Society, 21: 299-313.
8. Clayman, S. and Gill, V.T., (2004), Conversation analysis, in M. Hardy and A. Bryman (eds), Handbook of Data Analysis, London: Sage.
9. Cumella, S., (2008), New public management and public services for people with an intellectual disability: a review of the implementation of Valuing People in England, Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disability, 5 (3): 178-186.
10. Curl, T. and Drew, P., (2008), Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41: 1-25.
11. Department of Health, (UK) (2001), Valuing People: a New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century, Cm 5086 London: HMSO.
12. Department of Health, (2005), Independence, Well-being and Choice: Our Vision for the Future of Social Care for Adults in England, London: Department of Health.
13. Department of Health, (2006), Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A New Direction for Community Services, Cm 6737 London: Department of Health.
14. Department of Health, (UK), (2009), Valuing People Now: A New Three-YearSstrategy for People with Learning Disabilities, London: HMSO.
15. Drew, P., Chatwin, J. and Collins, S., (2001), Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals, Health Expectations, 4 (1): 58-71.
16. Finlay, W.M.L., Antaki, C. and Walton, C., (2008), Saying no to the staff: an analysis of refusals in a home for people with severe communication difficulties, Sociology of Health and Illness, 30 (1): 55-75.
17. Finlay, W.M.L., Antaki, C., Walton, C and Stribling, P., (2008), The dilemma for staff in 'playing a game' with people with a profound intellectual disability, Sociology of Health and Illness, 30 (4): 531-549.
18. Fraser, B., (1980), Conversational mitigation, Journal of Pragmatics, 4: 341-350.
19. Fyson, R. and Kitson, D., (2007), Independence or Protection - does it have to be a choice? Critical Social Policy, 27 (3): 426-436.
20. Gill, V.T., (1998), Doing attributions in medical interaction: Patients' explanations for illnesses and physicians' responses, Social Psychology Quarterly, 61 (4): 342-360.
21. Gillies, V., (2008), Perspectives on parenting responsibility: Contextualising values and practices, Journal of Law and Society, 35 (1): 95-112.
22. Goode, D., (1990), Thinking about and discussing quality of life, in R.L. Schalock (ed.), Quality of Life: Perspectives and Issues, Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation: 41-57.
23. Have, P. ten, (2007), Doing Conversation Analysis: a Practical Guide, (2nd edition). London: Sage.
24. Heath, C., (1992), The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general practice consultation, in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Heritage, J. and Watson, R., (1979), Formulations as conversational objects, in G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language, New York: Irvington Press: 123-162.
26. Housley, W., (2003), Interaction in Multidisciplinary Teams, Aldershot: Ashgate.
27. Hutchby, I. and O'Reilly, M., (2010), Children's participation and the familial moral order in family therapy, Discourse Studies, 12 (1): 49-64.
28. Jingree, T., Finlay, W. and Antaki, C., (2006), Empowering words, disempowering actions: an analysis of interactions between staff members and people with learning disabilities in residents'meetings, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50 (3): 212-226.
29. Kittay, E., (1999), Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency, New York: Routledge.
30. Maynard, D., (2003), Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Maynard, D. and Marlaire, C., (1992), Good reasons for bad testing performance: the interactional substrate of educational testing, Qualitative Sociology, 15: 177-202.
32. Meyers, C.E., Borthwick, S.A. and Beyman, R., (1985), Place of residence by age, ethnicity and level of retardation of the mentally handicapped/developmentally disabled population of California, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90 (3): 266-270.
33. Murphy, E., Clegg, J. and Almack, K., (2011), Constructing adulthood in discussions about the futures of young people with moderate-profound intellectual disabilities, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 24: 61-73.
34. Perakyla, A. and Silverman, D., (1991), Owning experience: describing the experience of other persons, Text, 11 (3): 441-480.
35. Pilnick, A., (2010), Pharmacy Counselling: A Study of the Pharmacist Patient Encounter Using Conversation Analysis, Berlin: VDM Verlag.
36. Pilnick, A., (1998), 'Why didn't you just say that?': Dealing with issues of asymmetry, knowledge and competence in the pharmacist/client encounter, Sociology of Health and Illness, 20 (1): 29-51.
37. Pilnick, A., Clegg, J., Murphy, E. and Almack, K., (2010), Questioning the answer: questioning style, choice and self-determination in interactions with young people with intellectual disabilities, Sociology of Health and Illness, 32 (3): 415-436.
38. Pomerantz, A., (1984), Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features ofpreferred / dispreferred turn shapes, in Heritage, J. and Atkinson, J.M., (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Rapley, M., (2004), The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Ribbens McCarthy, J., Edwards, R. And Gillies, V., (2000), Moral tales of the child and the adult: narratives of contemporary family lives under changing circumstances, Sociology, 34 (4): 785-803.
41. Schelly, D., (2008), Problems associated with choice and quality of life for an individual with intellectual disability: a personal assistant's reflexive ethnography, Disability & Society, 23 (7): 719-732.
42. Shakespeare, P., (1998), Aspects of Confused Speech: A Study of Verbal Interaction Between Confused and Normal Speakers, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Stivers, T., (2001), Negotiating who presents the problem: next speaker selection in paediatric encounters, Journal of Communication, 51: 1-31.
44. Todd, S. and Shearn, J., (1996), Struggles with Time: the careers of parents with adult sons and daughters with learning disabilities, Disability and Society, 11 (3): 379-401.
45. Voysey Paun, M., (2006), A Constant Burden: The Reconstitution of Family Life, Aldershot: Ashgate.
46. Young, I.M., (2001), Two concepts of self-determination, in A. Sarat and T.R. Kearns (eds), Human Rights: Concepts Contests, Contingencies, Michigan: University of Michigan Press: 25-44.