The Neural Representation of Consonant-Vowel Transitions in Adults Who Wear Hearing Aids

Trends in Amplification

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 155-162

  Tremblay, Kelly L ^a   Kalstein, Laura ^a   Billings, Cuttis J ^a   Souza, Pamela E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

acoustic change complex (ACC); amplification; auditory evoked potentials (AEP); cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP); event related potentials (ERP); hearing aids; N100; P1 N1 P2 complex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSONANT; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; NERVOUS SYSTEM; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; SOUND; SPEECH; VOWEL;

AGED; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33747036690     PISSN: 10847138     EISSN: 19405588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1084713806292655     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Souza PE Tremblay KL. New perspectives on assessing amplification effects. Trends Amplif. 2006;10: XX–XX.
2. Cox RM Alexander GC. Expectations about hearing aids and their relationship to fitting outcome. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11: 368–382.
3. Schum DJ. Perceived hearing aid benefit in relation to perceived needs. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10: 40–45.
4. Naatanen R Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a reveiw and analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology. 1987;24: 375–425.
5. Wolpaw JR Penry JK. A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1975;39: 609–620.
6. Woods D. The component structure of the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1995;44: 102–109.
7. Ostroff JM Martin BA Boothroyd A. Cortical evoked responses to spectral change within a syllable. Ear Hear. 1998;19: 290–297.
8. Martin BA Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. Ear Hear. 1999;20: 33–44.
9. Tremblay KL Friesen L Martin BA Wright R. Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally-produced speech sounds. Ear Hear. 2003;24;225–232.
10. Kent R Read C. The Acoustic Analysis of Speech. New York, NY: Thomson Learning; 2002.
11. Tremblay KL Billings CJ Friesen LM Souza PE. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds. Ear Hear. 2006;27: 93–103.
12. Willott JF Hnath Chisolm T Lister JJ. Modulation of presbycusis: current status and future directions. Audiol Neurootol. 2001;6: 231–249.
13. Roup CM Wiley TL Safady SH Stoppenbach DT. Tympanometric screening norms for adults. Am J Audiol. 1998;7: 55–60.
14. Dubno JR Schaefer AB. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992;91(4 pt 1): 2110–2121.
15. Byrne D Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories’ (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear. 1986;7: 257–265.
16. Caldwell M Souza P Tremblay K. Effects of probe microphone placement on the measurement of speech in the external ear canal. Trends Amplif. 2006;10: XX–XX.
17. Harkrider AW Plyler PN Hedrick MS. Effects of age and spectral shaping on perception and neural representation of stop consonant stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116: 2153–2164.
18. Friesen LM Tremblay KL. Acoustic change complexes (ACC) recorded in adult cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear. In press.
19. Tremblay KL Piskosz M Souza PE. Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114: 1332–1343.