Attentional prioritization to contextually new objects

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 543-548

  Ogawa, Hirokazu ^a,b   Kumada, Takatsune ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37849187003     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193883     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. AWH, E., & PASHLER, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 834-846.
2. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
3. CASTIELLO, U., & UMILTÀ, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 837-848.
4. CHUN, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
5. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
6. FISER, J., & ASLIN, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12, 499-504.
7. FISER, J., & ASLIN, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 458-467.
8. GODUN, R., & THEEUWES, J. (2003). Parallel allocation of attention prior to the execution of saccade sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 882-896.
9. GORDON, R. D. (2004). Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 760-777.
10. HAHN, S., & KRAMER, A. F. (1998). Further evidence for the division of attention between noncontiguous locations. Visual Cognition, 5, 217-256.
11. HENDERSON, J. M., WEEKS, P. A., & HOLLINGWORTH, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 210-228.
12. HILLSTROM, A. P., & YANTIS, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 399-411.
13. HOLLINGWORTH, A., & HENDERSON, J. M. (1998). Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 398-415.
14. JOHNSTON, W. A., SCHWARTING, L S., & HAWLEY, K. J. (1996). Novel pop-out, perceptual inhibition, and the stability-plasticity dilemma. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 315-335). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. JONIDES, J., & YANTIS, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
16. KIM, M. S., & CAVE, K. R. (1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions. Psychological Science, 6, 376-380.
17. KLEIN, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
18. KOSHINO, H., WARNER, C. B., & JUOLA, J. F. (1992). Relative effectiveness of central, peripheral, and abrupt-onset cues in visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 609-631.
19. KRAMER, A. F., & HAHN, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field. Psychological Science, 6, 381-386.
20. MALJKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7, 571-595.
21. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
22. PETERSON, M. S., & KRAMER, A. F. (2001a). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1239-1249.
23. PETERSON, M. S., & KRAMER, A. F. (2001b). Contextual cueing reduces interference from task-irrelevant onset distiactors. Visual Cognition, 8, 843-859.
24. REBER, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235.
25. REICHER, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 274-280.
26. SAFFRAN, J. R., ASLIN, R. N., & NEWPORT, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
27. THEEUWES, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentkmal set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 799-806.
28. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., HALM, S., & IRWIN, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379-385.
29. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
30. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentkmal inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
31. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 471-481.
32. WEISSTEIN, N., & HARRIS, C. S. (1974). Visual detection of line segments: An object-superiority effect. Science, 196, 752-755.
33. YANTIS, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 676-681.
34. YANTIS, S., & HILLSTROM, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception A Performance, 20, 95-107.
35. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.
36. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134.