Improving the ethanol yield by reducing glycerol formation using cofactor regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Biotechnology Letters

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1375-1380

  Zhang, Liang ^a   Tang, Yan ^a   Guo, Zhong peng ^a   Ding, Zhong yang ^a   Shi, Gui yang ^a  

^a JIANGNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cofactor regulation; Ethanol yields; Glycerol production; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

BATCH FERMENTATION; COFACTOR-REGULATION; COFACTORS; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL YIELD; ETHANOL YIELDS; FUMARATES; GLYCEROL PRODUCTION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC HYDROLYSATES; WILD TYPES;

ACETIC ACID; ALDEHYDES; BACILLUS CEREUS; BACTERIOLOGY; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); ESCHERICHIA COLI; ETHANOL; GENE ENCODING; GLYCEROL;

YEAST;

ALCOHOL; GLYCEROL; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE;

ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ARTICLE; BACILLUS CEREUS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENZYMOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENETICS; METABOLISM; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BACILLUS CEREUS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ETHANOL; GLYCEROL; LIGNIN; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NAD; NADP; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BACILLUS CEREUS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 79958769394     PISSN: 01415492     EISSN: 15736776     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10529-011-0588-6     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Albers E, Larsson C, Lidén G, Niklasson C, Gustafsson L (1996) Influence of the nitrogen source on Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaerobic growth and product formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 3187-3195.
2. Bellissimi E, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA (2009) Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res 9: 358-364.
3. Björkqvist S, Ansell R, Adler L, Lidén G (1997) Physiological response to anaerobicity of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 128-132.
4. Bro C, Regenberg B, Forster J, Nielsen J (2006) In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. Metab Eng 8: 102-111.
5. Guadalupe Medina V, Almering MJ, van Maris AJ, Pronk JT (2010) Elimination of glycerol production in anaerobic cultures of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to use acetic acid as an electron acceptor. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 190-195.
6. Guo ZP, Zhang L, Ding ZY, Wang ZX, Shi GY (2009) Interruption of glycerol pathway in industrial alcoholic yeasts to improve the ethanol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82: 287-292.
7. Guo ZP, Zhang L, Ding ZY, Shi GY (2011) Minimization of glycerol synthesis in industrial ethanol yeast without influencing its fermentation performance. Metab Eng 13(1): 49-59.
8. Ito H, Fukuda Y, Murata K, Kimura A (1983) Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol 153: 163-168.
9. Mracek J, Snyder SJ, Chavez UB, Turrens JF (1991) A soluble fumarate reductase in Trypanosoma brucei procyclic trypomastigotes. J Protozool 38(6): 554-558.
10. Nissen TL, Schulze U, Nielsen J, Villadsen J (1997) Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited continuous cultivations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol 143: 203-218.
11. Nissen TL, Kielland-Brandt MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J (2000) Optimization of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metab Eng 2: 69-77.
12. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP (1990) Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J Gen Microbiol 136: 395-403.