CAM: A web tool for combining array CGH and microarray gene expression data from multiple samples

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 781-785

  Oh, Mira ^a   Song, Bongjun ^a   Lee, Hyunju ^a  

^a Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Array CGH; Cancer; DNA copy number aberrations; Gene expression

Indexed keywords

ARRAY CGH; CANCER; COPY NUMBER; DATA SETS; MICROARRAY GENE EXPRESSION DATA; MULTIPLE SAMPLES; WEB TOOLS; WEB-BASED TOOLS;

ABERRATIONS; CAMS; DNA;

GENE EXPRESSION;

ARTICLE; CANCER GENETICS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; INTERNET; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; INTERNET; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 79958765376     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Pinkel D., Albertson D.G. Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer. Nature Genetics 2005, 37:s11-s17.
2. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways, Nature 455(7216) (2008) 1061-1068.
3. Weir B.A., Woo M.S., Getz G., Perner S., Ding L., et al. Characterizing the cancer genome in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 2007, 450(7171):893-898.
4. Mullighan C.G., Goorha S., Radtke I., Miller C.B., et al. Genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature 2007, 446(7137):758-764.
5. Kotliarov Y., et al. High-resolution global genomic survey of 178 gliomas reveals novel regions of copy number alteration and allelic imbalances. Cancer Research 2006, 66:9428-9436.
6. Olshen A.B., Venkatraman E.S., Lucito R., Wigler M. Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 2004, 5(4):557-572.
7. Hupé P., Stransky N., Thiery J.P., Radvanyi F., Barillot E. Analysis of array CGH data: from signal ratio to gain and loss of DNA regions. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(18):3413-3422.
8. Hsu L., Self S.G., Grove D., Randolph T., et al. Denoising array-based comparative genomic hybridization data using wavelets. Biostatistics 2005, 6(2):211-226.
9. Weil R.L., Johnson M.D., Kucherlapati R., Park P. Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(19):3763-3770.
10. Rouveirol C., Stransky N., Hupe Ph., et al. Computation of recurrent minimal genomic alterations from array-CGH data. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(7):849-856.
11. Diskin S.J., Eck T., Greshock J., Mosse Y., et al. STAC: A method for testing the significance of DNA copy number aberrations across multiple array-CGH experiments. Genome Research 2005, 16(9):1149-1158.
12. Pollack J.R., Sørlie T., Perou C.M., Rees C.A., et al. Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 2002, 99(20):12963-12968.
13. Jarvinen A.K., et al. Identification of target genes in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma by high-resolution copy number and gene expression microarray analyses. Oncogene 2006, 25:6997-7008.
14. Chaudhary J., Schmidt M. The impact of genomic alterations on the transcriptome: a prostate cancer cell line case study. Chromosome Research 2006, 14:567-586.
15. Nigro J.M., et al. Integrated array-comparative genomic hybridization and expression array profiles identify clinically relevant molecular subtypes of glioblastoma. Cancer Research 2005, 65:1678-1686.
16. Soroceanu L., et al. Identification of IGF2 signaling through phosphoinositide- 3-kinase regulatory subunit 3 as a growth-promoting axis in glioblastoma. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 2007, 104:3466-3471.
17. Conde L., Montaner D., Burguet-Castell J., et al. ISACGH: a web-based environment for the analysis of array CGH and gene expression which includes functional profiling. Nucleic Acids Research 2007, 35(Web Server issue):W81-W85.
18. Díaz-Uriarte R., Rueda O.M. ADaCGH: a parallelized web-based application and R package for the analysis of aCGH data. PLoS ONE 2007, 2(1):e737.
19. Lai W., Choudhary C., Park P.J. CGHweb: a tool for comparing DNA copy number segmentations from multiple algorithms. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(7):1014-1015.
20. Storey J.D., Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 2003, 100:9440-9445.
21. Al-Shahrour F., Minguez P., Tarraga J., Montaner D., Alloza E., Vaquerizas J.M., Conde L., Blaschke C., Vera J., Dopazo J. BABELOMICS: a systems biology perspective in the functional annotation of genome-scale experiments. Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34(Web Server issue):W472-W476.
22. Beroukhim R., Mermel C.H., Porter D., Wei G., Raychaudhuri S., et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 2010, 463(7283):899-905.
23. Bignell G.R., Greenman C.D., Davies H., Butler A.P., Edkins S., et al. Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome. Nature 2010, 463(7283):893-898.
24. Oinn T., Addis M., Ferris J., Marvin D., Senger M., et al. Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(17):3045-3054.