APSA Hayward Alker prize winning essay: Tensions in deliberative practice: A view from civil society

Critical Policy Studies

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 384-404

  Dodge, Jennifer ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Civil society; Deliberative democracy; Deliberative practice; Environmental justice; Tensions

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958748963     PISSN: 19460171     EISSN: 1946018X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2010.525904     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. ACI (Association for Commerce and Industry), 2007. 2007 Legislative Agenda. Santa Fe, New Mexico: Association for Commerce and Industry.
2. ATRI (Alliance for Transportation Research Institute), 2004. Final report: a report on environmental justice in New Mexico. Santa Fe, NM: New Mexico Environment Department. Contract No. 04-667-1000-0003.
3. Barnes, M. et al., 2003. Constituting 'the public' in public participation. Public administration, 81 (2), 379-399.
4. Bryant, B., 2003. History and issues of the environmental justice movement. In: G. Visgilio and D. Whitelaw, eds. Our backyard: a quest for environmental justice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 3-23.
5. Chambers, S., 2009. Rhetoric and the public sphere: has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy? Political theory, 37 (3), 323-350.
6. Chetkovich, C. and Kunreuther, F., 2006. From the ground up: grassroots organizations making social change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7. Cohen, J., 1996. Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In: S. Benhabib, Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 95-119.
8. Cohen, J. and Arato, A., 1992. Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Córdova, T. et al., 2000. Building networks to tackle global restructuring: The environmental and economic justice movement. In: J.J. Betancur and D.C. Gills. The collaborative city: opportunities and struggles for Blacks and Latinos in U.S. cities. New York and London: Garland Publishing, 177-196.
10. Crosby, B.C. and Bryson, J.M., 2007. A leadership framework for cross-sector collaboration. Public management review, 7 (2), 177-201.
11. Dodge, J., 2009. Environmental justice and deliberative democracy: how social change organizations respond to power in the deliberative system. Policy & society, 28 (3), 225-239.
12. Dodge, J., Ospina, S. and Sparrow, R., 2004. Making partnership a habit: Margie McHugh and the New York Immigration Coalition. In: S.D. Pierce, ed. Case studies series: bridging the social divide: a grounded view of partnership-building in Latin America, Southeast Asia, Southern Africa and North America. New York: Synergos. Available from: http://www.synergos.org/ bridgingleadership/casestudies/margie_mchugh.pdf
13. Dryzek, J.S., 1990. Discursive democracy: politics, policy, and political science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Dryzek, J.S., 1997. The politics of the earth: environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Dryzek, J.S., 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Dryzek, J.S., 2009. Democratization as deliberative capacity building. Comparative political studies, 42 (4), 1379-1402.
17. Eisenhardt, K.M., 2000. Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: the new language of change and pluralism. The academy of management review, 25 (4), 703-705.
18. Eliasoph, N., 1998. Avoiding politics: how Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Espinosa, J.M. and Gauna, E., 2004. Environmental justice background report for the New Mexico environment department. Santa Fe, New Mexico: University of New Mexico and ATR Institute.
20. Fischer, F., 2003. Reframing public policy: discursive politics and deliberative practices. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Fischer, F., 2006. Participatory governance as deliberative empowerment: the cultural politics of discursive space. American review of public administration, 36 (1), 19-40.
22. Forester, J., 1993. Critical theory, public policy and planning practice: toward a critical pragmatism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
23. Forester, J., 1999. The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
24. Fraser, N., 1992. Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In: C. Calhoun, ed. Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 109-142.
25. Fung, A. and Wright, E.O., eds., 2003. Deepening democracy: institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. New York: Verso.
26. Gutman, A. and Thompson, D., 1996. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
27. Habermas, J., 1996. Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Hajer, M.A., 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernizations and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29. Hajer, M.A. and Versteeg, W., 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of environmental policy & planning, 7 (3), 175-184.
30. Hendriks, C.M., 2006a. When the forum meets interest politics: strategic uses of public deliberation. Politics & society, 34 (4), 571-602.
31. Hendriks, C.M., 2006b. Integrated deliberation: reconciling civil society's dual role in deliberative democracy. Political studies, 54 (3), 486-508.
32. Hendriks, C.M., 2009. Deliberative governance in the context of power. Policy & society, special issue: deliberative governance in the context of power, 28 (3), 173-184.
33. Hoppe, R., 1996. Political judgment and the policy cycle: the case of ethnicity policy arguments in the Netherlands. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester, eds. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 77-100.
34. Howarth, D. and Stavrakakis, Y., 2000. Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. In: D. Howarth, R.Y. Stavrakakis and A.J. Norval, eds. Discourse theory and political analysis: identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1-23.
35. Koontz, T.M. and Johnson, E.M., 2004. One size does not fit all: matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy sciences, 37 (2), 185-204.
36. Ledesma, S., n.d. EJ assessment report of the SW Network. Unpublished report, sponsored by the EJ Fund. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Southwest Network for Environmental and Economic Justice.
37. Levine, P. and Nierras, R.M., 2007. Activists' views of deliberation. Journal of public deliberation, 3 (1), 1-14.
38. Mansbridge, J., 1999. Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In: S. Macedo, ed. Deliberative politics-essays on democracy and disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 211-239.
39. Montpetit, E., Scala, F. and Fortier, I., 2004. The paradox of deliberative democracy: the National Action Committee on the Status of Women and Canada's policy on reproductive technology. Policy sciences, 37 (2), 137-157.
40. New Mexico Environment Department, 2007. Solid waste management plan for New Mexico, 2007. Santa Fe, NM: New Mexico Environment Department.
41. New Mexico Legislature, 2005. New Mexico Healthy Communities Act (house bill 722; senate bill 710). Santa Fe, New Mexico: New Mexico Legislature.
42. New Mexico Legislature, 2006. Commitment to healthy communities (house joint memorial 44; senate joint memorial 27). Santa Fe, NM: New Mexico Legislature.
43. New Mexico Legislature, 2007. New Mexico environmental health act (house bill 888; senate bill 880). Santa Fe, New Mexico: New Mexico Legislature.
44. Norval, A.J., 2007. Aversive democracy: inheritance and originality in the democratic tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Norval, A.J., 2009. Untitled comments. Panel: deliberative democracy and civil society: interpretive approaches (Theory, policy and society conference group). American Political Science Association Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 6 September.
46. Ospina, S., et al., Forthcoming. Toward a framework of social change leadership. In: M. Uhl-Bien and S. Ospina, eds. Advancing relational leadership theory: a conversation among perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
47. Ospina, S. and Dodge, J., 2005. It's about time: catching method up to meaning-the usefulness of narrative inquiry in public administration research. Public administration review, 65 (2), 143-157.
48. Ospina, S.M. and Saz-Carranza, A., 2010. Paradox and collaboration in network management. Administration & society, 42 (4), 404-440.
49. Pelletier, D., Kraak, V., McCullum, C., Uusitalo, U. and Rich, R., 1999. The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: an empirical study from New York's North Country. Policy sciences, 32 (2), 103-131.
50. Polletta, F., 1999. Free spaces in collective action. Theory and society, 28 (1), 1-38.
51. Poole, M.S. and Van de Ven, A.H., 1989. Using paradox to build management and organizational theories. Academy of management review, 14 (4), 562-578.
52. Southwest Network for Environmental and Economic Justice, 2008. Mission statement [online]. Southwest Network for Environmental and Economic Justice. Available from: http://www.sneej. org/about-contact/about-mission-eng.htm [Accessed 24 November 2008].
53. Stake, R.E., 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
54. State of New Mexico, 2005. New Mexico Environmental Justice Executive Order. Santa Fe, NM: State of New Mexico.
55. Supreme Court of New Mexico, 2005. Colonias Development Council vs. Rhino Environmental Services, Inc. and New Mexico Department of Environment. No. 28, 337. 18 July 2005.
56. Warren, M.E., 1996. Deliberative democracy and authority. The American political science review, 90 (1), 46-60.
57. Yanow, D., 1996. How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
58. Young, I.M., 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59. Young, I.M., 2001. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political theory, 29 (5), 670-690.
60. Zwart, I., 2003. A greener alternative?: Deliberative democracy meets local government. Environmental politics, 12 (2), 23-48.