Integrating advice and experience: Learning and decision making with social and nonsocial cues

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 967-982

  Collins, Elizabeth C ^a,b   Percy, Elise J ^a   Smith, Eliot R ^a   Kruschke, John K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE LISBOA ISCTE IUL   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Advice taking; Cognitive learning models; Decision making; Social influence

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TRUST;

ATTENTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TRUST;

EID: 79958706901     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022982     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Asch S.E. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Groups, leadership and men; research in human relations 1951, 177-190. Carnegie Press, Oxford, England. H. Guetzkow (Ed.).
2. Beckers T., Miller R.R., De Houwer J., Urushihara K. Reasoning rats: Forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:92-102. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.92.
3. Bonaccio S., Dalal R.S. Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2006, 101:127-151. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001.
4. Bott L., Hoffman A.B., Murphy G.L. Blocking in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136:685-699. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.685.
5. Budescu D.V., Rantilla A.K. Confidence in aggregation of expert opinions. Acta Psychologica 2000, 104:371-398. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00037-8.
6. Budescu D.V., Rantilla A.K., Yu H.-T., Karelitz T.M. The effects of asymmetry among advisors on the aggregation of their opinions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2003, 90:178-194. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00516-2.
7. Centola D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 2010, September 3, 329:1194-1197. doi: 10.1126/science.1185231.
8. Centola D., Macy M. Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology 2007, 113:702-734. doi: 10.1086/521848.
9. Craik K.H. Reputation: A network interpretation 2008, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
10. De Houwer J., Beckers T., Vandorpe S. Evidence for the role of higher order reasoning processes in cue competition and other learning phenomena. Learning & Behavior 2005, 33:239-249. doi: 10.3758/BF03196066.
11. Hardt O., Hupbach A., Nadel L. Factors moderating blocking in human place learning: The role of task instructions. Learning & Behavior 2009, 37:42-59. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.1.42.
12. Harkins S.G., Petty R.E. Effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981, 40:401-413. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.401.
13. Harkins S.G., Petty R.E. Information utility and the multiple source effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 52:260-268. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.260.
14. Hutchins E. Social organization of distributed cognition. Perspectives on socially shared cognition 1991, 283-307. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. L. Resnick, J. Levine, S. Teasley (Eds.).
15. Kamin L.J. " Attention-like" processes in classical conditioning. Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimulation 1968, 9-33. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, FL. M.R. Jones (Ed.).
16. Kennedy J., Eberhart R.C. Swarm intelligence 2001, Kauffmann/Academic Press, San Francisco, CA.
17. Krech D., Crutchfield R., Ballachey E. Individual in society 1962, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
18. Kruschke J.K. The inverse base-rate effect is not explained by eliminative inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:1385-1400. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1385.
19. Kruschke J.K. Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2001, 45:812-863. doi: 10.1006/jmps.2000.1354.
20. Kruschke J.K. Attention in learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2003, 12:171-175. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01254.
21. Kruschke J.K. Highlighting: A canonical experiment. The psychology of learning and motivation 2009, 51:153-185. Academic Press, Burlington, MA. B. Ross (Ed.).
22. Kruschke J.K., Blair N.J. Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:636-645. doi: 10.3758/BF03213001.
23. Kruschke J.K., Kappenman E.S., Hetrick W.P. Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:830-845. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.830.
24. Latané B. The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 1981, 36:343-356. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343.
25. Laughlin P.R., Ellis A.L. Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1986, 22:177-189. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-3.
26. Lee M.D., Dry M.J. Decision making and confidence given uncertain advice. Cognitive Science 2006, 30:1081-1095. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_71.
27. Mackintosh N.J. A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review 1975, 82:276-298. doi: 10.1037/h0076778.
28. Mason W.A., Conrey F.R., Smith E.R. Situating social influence processes: Dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2007, 11:279-300. doi: 10.1177/1088868307301032.
29. Medin D.L., Edelson S.M. Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1988, 117:68-85. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.68.
30. Nowak A., Szamrej J., Latané B. From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review 1990, 97:362-376. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.362.
31. Ranganath K.A., Spellman B.A., Joy-Gaba J.A. Cognitive " category-based induction" research and social " persuasion" research are each about what makes arguments believable: A tale of two literatures. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2010, 5:115-122. doi: 10.1177/1745691610361604.
32. Rescorla R.A., Wagner A.R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory 1972, 64-99. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY. A.H. Black, W.F. Prokasy (Eds.).
33. Sanfey A.G., Rilling J.K., Aronson J.A., Nystrom L.E., Cohen J.D. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 2003, June 13, 300:1755-1758. doi: 10.1126/science.1082976.
34. Smith E.R., Collins E.C. Contextualizing person perception: Distributed social cognition. Psychological Review 2009, 116:343-364. doi: 10.1037/a0015072.
35. Soll J.B., Larrick R.P. Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others' opinions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:780-805. doi: 10.1037/a0015145.
36. Sommerfeld R.D., Krambeck H.-J., Semmann D., Milinski M. Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2007, 104:17435-17440. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704598104.
37. Van Overwalle F., Heylighen F. Talking nets: A multiagent connectionist approach to communication and trust between individuals. Psychological Review 2006, 113:606-627. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.606.