Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 737-749

  Cho, Dongbin Tobin ^a   Proctor, Robert W ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affordance; Grasping; Simon task; Stimulus response compatibility; Within hand responses

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; REFERENCE VALUE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FORM PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 79958706511     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021934     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anzola G.P., Bertoloni G.G., Buchtel H.A., Rizzolatti G.G. Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia 1977, 15:295-302.
2. Bosbach S., Prinz W., Kerzel D. Is direction position? Position- and direction-based correspondence effects in tasks with moving stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2005, 58A:467-506.
3. Bub D.N., Masson M.E.J. Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:341-358.
4. Buckolz E., O'Donnell C., McAuliffe J. The Simon effect: Evidence of a response processing " functional locus." Human Movement Science 1996, 15:543-564.
5. Cho D.T., Proctor R.W. The object-based Simon effect: Grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:853-861.
6. Craft J.L., Simon J.R. Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1970, 83:415-420.
7. Derbyshire N., Ellis R., Tucker M. The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory. Acta Psychologica 2006, 122:74-98.
8. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception 1979, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
9. Heister G., Ehrenstein W.H., Schroeder-Heister P. Spatial S-R compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions: Effects of irrelevant stimulus location. Perception & Psychophysics 1987, 42:195-201.
10. Hommel B. The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research 1993, 55:280-290.
11. Hommel B. The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research 1993, 55:208-222.
12. Hommel B., Lippa Y. S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding. Psychology Bulletin & Review 1995, 2:370-374.
13. Katz A.N. Spatial compatibility effects with hemifield presentation in a unimanual two-finger task. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1981, 35:63-68.
14. Kornblum S. Response competition and/or inhibition in two-choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science 1965, 2:55-56.
15. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 1990, 97:253-270.
16. Lamberts K., Tavernier G., d'Ydewalle G. Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Acta Psychologica 1992, 79:115-130.
17. Loach D., Frischen A., Bruce N., Tsotsos J. An attentional mechanism for selecting appropriate actions afforded by graspable objects. Psychological Science 2008, 19:1253-1257.
18. Michaels C.F. S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1988, 14:231-240.
19. Miller J. Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1982, 8:273-296.
20. Nicoletti R., Anzola G.P., Luppino G., Rizzolatti G., Umiltà C. Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1982, 8:664-673.
21. Phillips J.C., Ward R. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:540-548.
22. Proctor R.W., Reeve T.G. Compatibility effects in the assignment of symbolic stimuli to discrete finger response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11:623-639.
23. Proctor R.W., Reeve T.G. Salient-feature coding operations in spatial precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1986, 12:277-285.
24. Proctor R.W., Reeve T.G. Research on stimulus-response compatibility: Toward a comprehensive account. Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective 1990, 483-494. North Holland, Amsterdam. R.W. Proctor, T.G. Reeve (Eds.).
25. Proctor R.W., Van Zandt T., Lu C.-H., Weeks D.J. Stimulus-response compatibility for moving stimuli: Perception of affordances or directional coding?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:81-91.
26. Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory and application 2006, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
27. Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:320-340.
28. Reeve T.G., Proctor R.W. On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:541-553.
29. Reeve T.G., Proctor R.W. Determinants of two-choice reaction-time patterns for same-hand and different-hand finger pairings. Journal of Motor Behavior 1988, 20:317-340.
30. Rubichi S., Vu K.-P.L., Nicoletti R., Proctor R.W. Spatial coding in two dimensions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:201-216.
31. Tipper S.P., Paul M.A., Hayes A.E. Vision for action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13(3):493-498.
32. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
33. Tucker M., Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition 2001, 8:769-800.
34. Wallace R.J. S-R compatibility and the idea of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 88:354-360.
35. Wiegand K., Wascher E. Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:453-464.
36. Wiegand K., Wascher E. Response coding in the Simon task. Psychological Research 2007, 71:401-410.