Reaction times for allocentric movements are 35 ms slower than reaction times for target-directed movements

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 211, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 313-328

  Thaler, Lore ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Allocentric; Dorsal; Hand movements; Lateral occipital cortex; Reaction time; Speed accuracy tradeoff; Ventral

Indexed keywords

ALLOCENTRIC MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MOUSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOCOMOTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT SPEED; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TARGET DIRECTED MOVEMENT; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL INFORMATION;

HUMANS; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79958256671     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2691-2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bock O (1986) Contribution of retinal versus extraretinal signals towards visual localization in goal-directed movements. Exp Brain Res 64(3):476-482
2. Brown LE, Rosenbaum DA, Sainburg RL (2003) Limb position drift: implications for control of posture and movement. J Neurophys 90:3105-3118 (Pubitemid 37430008)
3. Cohen NR, Cross ES, Tunik E, Grafton ST, Culham JC (2009) Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach. Neuropsychologia 47:1553-1562
4. Danckert J, Goodale MA (2003) The ups and downs of vision. In: Johnson SH (ed) From intentions to movements. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 29-64
5. de Grave DDJ, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2004) Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 155:56-62 (Pubitemid 38315313)
6. Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C (1998) From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neurosci Biobehavioral Rev 22:761-788 (Pubitemid 28493448)
7. Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST (1999) Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2:563-567 (Pubitemid 30491238)
8. DiZio P, Lackner JR (1995) Motor adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. J Neurophys 74:1787-1792
9. Filimon F, Nelson JD, Huang RS, Sereno MI (2009) Multiple parietal reach regions in humans: cortical representations for visual and proprioceptive feedback during on-line reaching. J Neurosci 29:2961-2971
10. Ghez C, Scheidt R, Heijink H (2007) Different learned coordinate frames for planning trajectories and final positions in reaching. J Neurophys 98:3614-3626
11. Gottlieb GL (1996) On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertialviscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms. J Neurophys 76:3207-3229
12. Gréa H, Pisella L, Rossetti Y, Desmurget M, Tilikete C, Grafton S, Prablanc C, Vighetto A (2002) A lesion of the posterior parietal cortex disrupts on-line adjustments during aiming movements. Neuropsychologia 40(13):2471-2480 (Pubitemid 35300170)
13. Haggard P, Newman C, Blundell J, Andrew H (2000) The perceived position of the hand in space. Percept Psychophys 62(2):363-377
14. Henriques DYP, Klier EM, Smith MA, Lowey D, Crawford JD (1998) Gaze-centered re-mapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. J Neurosci 18:1583-1594 (Pubitemid 28082439)
15. Hirayama M, Kawato M, Jordan MI (1993) The cascade neural network model and a speed-accuracy trade-off of arm movement. J Motor Behavior 25:162-174
16. Izawa J, Shadmehr R (2008) Online processing of uncertain information in visuomotor control. J Neurosci 28:11360-11368
17. Lackner JR, DiZio P (1994) Rapid adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophys 72:299-313
18. Lackner JR, DiZio P (1998) Gravito inertial force background level affects adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements. J Neurophys 80:546-553 (Pubitemid 28387640)
19. Liu D, Todorov E (2007) Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control. J Neurosci 27:9354-9368 (Pubitemid 47358214)
20. Loftus A, Servos P, Goodale MA, Mendarozqueta N, Mon-Williams M (2004) When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Exp Brain Res 158(3):317-327 (Pubitemid 39304297)
21. Milner AD, Goodale MA (2008) Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 46(3):774-785 (Pubitemid 351255549)
22. Milner AD, Paulignan Y, Dijkerman HC, Michel F, Jeannerod M (1999) A paradoxical improvement of optic ataxia with delay: new evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2225-2230
23. Milner AD, Dijkerman HC, Pisella L, McIntosh RD, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Rossetti Y (2001) Grasping the past: delay can improve visuomotor performance. Curr Biol 11:1896-1901 (Pubitemid 33136532)
24. Milner AD, Dijkerman HC, McIntosh RD, Rossetti Y, Pisella L (2003) Delayed reaching and grasping in patients with optic ataxia. Prog Brain Res 142:225-242 (Pubitemid 36368287)
25. Ogawa K, Inui T, Sugio T (2006) Separating brain regions involved in internally guided and visual feedback control of moving effectors: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 32(4):1760-1770 (Pubitemid 44332278)
26. Pisella L, Gre?a H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y (2000) An 'automatic pilot' for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat Neurosci 3:729-736
27. Previc FH (1990) Functional specialisation in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav Brain Sci 13:519-575
28. Sainburg RL, Wang J (2002) Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: Independence of direction and final position information. Exp Brain Res 145:437-447 (Pubitemid 34994786)
29. Sainburg RL, Ghez C, Kalakanis D (1999) Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J Neurophys 81:1040-1056
30. Scheidt RA, Ghez C (2007) Separate adaptive mechanisms for controlling trajectory and final position in reaching. J Neurophys 98:3600-3613
31. Schenk T (2006) An allocentric rather than perceptual deficit in patient D.F. Nat Neurosci 9:1369-1370
32. Schlicht E, Schrater P (2007) Impact of coordinate transformation uncertainty on human sensorimotor control. J Neurophys 97:4203-4214 (Pubitemid 47080651)
33. Strother L, Aldcroft A, Lavell C, Vilis T (2010) Equal degrees of object-selectivity for upper and lower visual field stimuli. J Neurophys 104(4):2075-2081
34. Thaler L, Goodale MA (2010) Beyond distance and direction: the CNS represents target location in a non-metric format. J Vis 10(3):1-27
35. Thaler L, Goodale MA (2011) The role of online visual feedback for the control of target-directed and allocentric hand movements. J Neurophys 105:846-859
36. Thaler L, Todd JT (2009a) The use of head/eye-centered, hand-centered and allocentric representations for visually guided hand movements and perceptual judgments. Neuropsychologia 47:1227-1244
37. Thaler L, Todd JT (2009b) The control parameters used by the CNS to guide the hand depend on the visuo-motor task: evidence from visually guided pointing. Neurosci 159:578-598
38. Thaler L, Todd JT (2010) Evidence from visuomotor adaptation for two partially independent visuomotor systems. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36(4):924-935