The booklet "Genetically modified crops", published from the German Research Foundation, does not meet the given claim;Die DFG-Broschüre 'Grüne Gentechnik' genügt ihrem eigenen Anspruch nicht'

Environmental Sciences Europe

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Taube, Friedhelm ^a   Krawinkel, Michael ^b   Susenbeth, Andreas ^a   Theobald, Werner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Agro biodiversity; Biodiversity; Bt maize; Codes of good agricultural practise; Coexistence; Ecosystem services; Environmental protection; Food security; Gene technology; Genetically modified crops; Glyphosate; Herbicide tolerance; Land use; Maize; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 79958212366     PISSN: 21904707     EISSN: 21904715     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2190-4715-23-1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (2010): Grüne Gentechnik. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (2009): Pressemitteilung Nr. 66, 16.12.2009
3. Thrupp, L.A. 1997. Linking biodiversity and agriculture: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable food security. World Resources Institute, USA.
4. Heidel, W. (2007) Der Maiszünsler in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern - Befallsausbreitung und Bekämpfungsstrategien. Nachrichtenbl Deut Pflanzenschutzd 59(11): 270-273
5. Theobald, W. (2009): Grüne Gentechnik - Kritik eines Bewertungsmodells. Teil 1: Bewertungsgrundlagen. Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 21(5): 419-432
6. Taube, F. und Theobald, W. (2010): Grüne Gentechnik - Kritik eines Bewertungsmodells. Teil 2: Diskussion von Fallbeispielen am Beispiel MON810 Mais. Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 22(5), 153-159
7. Busch, JR., Haniel, A., Knoeppfler, N., Wenzel, G. (2002) Grüne Gentechnik. Ein Bewertungsmodell. München: Herbert Utz Verlag
8. Grober, U. (2010): Die Entdeckung der Nachhaltigkeit - Kulturgeschichte eines Begriffs. Verlag Antje Kunstmann, München
9. Brannstrom, C. (2009): South America's neoliberal agricultural frontiers: places of environmental sacrifi ce or conservation opportunity? Ambio, 38, 141-149
10. Hecht, S B (2005): Soybeans, development and conservation on the Amazonas frontiers. Dev. Change 36, 375-404 (Pubitemid 40836545)
11. Culpepper, A. S.; Grey, T. L.; Vencill, W. K.; Kichler, J. M.; Webster, T. M.; Brown, S. M.; York, A. C.; Davis, J. W. et al. (2006). "Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri ) confi rmed in Georgia". Weed Science 54: 620-626. (Pubitemid 44619330)
12. Lenk, H. und Maring, M. (2208): Ethik der Wissenschaft - Wissenschaft der Ethik. Erwägen, Wissen, Ethik, Jg. 19/2008, 489-500
13. Yamada, T, Kremer, R, Casto, P, Wood, B.W. (2009): Glyphosate interactions with physiology, nutrition, and diseases of plants: Threat to agricultural sustainability? Europ. J. Agronomy, 31, 111-113
14. Neumann, G, Kohls, S, Landsberg, E, Souza, K, Yamada, T, Römheld, V (2009): Relevance of glyphosate transfer to non-target plants via the rhizoshere. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, Special issue
15. FAO. The State of the World's plant genetic resources. Rome, 1997
16. ISAAA-Briefs. No. 41 - 2009, Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2009
17. Martinez, JL. The role of natural environments in the evolution of resistance traits in pathogenic bacteria, Proc. R. Soc. B 2009 276, 2521-2530
18. Hug, K. Genetically modified organisms: do the benefits outweigh the risks? Medicina (Kaunas) 2008; 44(2)
19. Bertoni, G. and Marsan, AP. Safety Risks for Animals Fed Genetic Modified (GM) Plants. Vet Res Commun 2005;29(Suppl 2):13-8 (Pubitemid 41637614)
20. Sachs, J. 2005, Das Ende der Armut. Siedler Verlag, München
21. Harden L, Erikkson M. A case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and exposure to pesticides. Cancer 1999 ;85:1353-60
22. Love, L. Pathological and immunological effects of ingesting L-Tryptophan. J Clin Invest 1993;91:804-11
23. Goodman, RE., Vieths, S., Sampson, HA., Hill, D., Ebisawa, M., Taylor, SL., van Ree, R. Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops-what makes sense? Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26(1):73-81
24. Aumaitre, LA. Safety assessment and feeding value for pigs, poultry and ruminant animals of pest protected (Bt) plants and herbicide tolerant (glyphosate, glufosinate) plants: interpretation of experimental results observed worldwide on GM plants. J Anim Sci 2004;3:107-21
25. Conway, G. Genetically modified crops: Risks and Promise. Conserv Ecol 2000;4:2
26. Van den Eede G, Aarts H, Buhk HJ, Corthier G, Flint HJ, Hammes W. The relevance of gene transfer to the safety of food and feed derived from genetically modified (GM) plants. Food Chem Toxicol 2004;42:1127-56 (Pubitemid 38581212)
27. Food Safety Department, World Health Organisation. Modern food biotechnology, human health and development: an evidence-based study. Geneva; 2005
28. Grisolia, CK. Genes, genome and Gestalt. Genet Mol Res 2005;4:100-104 (Pubitemid 40605269)
29. Tang G, Qin J, Dolnikowski GG, Russell RM, Grusak MA. Golden Rice is an effective source of vitamin A. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009:89(6):1776-83
30. Krawinkel, MB. beta-Carotene from rice for human nutrition? Am J Clin Nutr. 2009:90:3:695-696
31. Sauter, A. Transgenes Saatgut in Entwicklungsländern - Erfahrungen, Herausforderungen, Perspektiven. Arbeitsberichte des Büros für Technikfolgenabschätzung des Deutschen Bundestags Nr. 128, Berlin, 2008
32. Cleaver, HM. The Contradictions of the Green Revolution. The American Economic Review 62:1/2:177-186
33. Tappeser, B., Grimm, F., Meise, T., Otto, M., Reichenberger, W., Teichmann, H. und Winkel, b. (2010): Koexistenz aus ökologischer Perspektive. Mitt. Ges. Pflanzenbauwiss., 22, 19-24
34. FAO, Extensive post-harvest losses prompt a new network to share solutions, 1998. http://www.fao.org/News/1998/980801-e.htm (Stand: 02.05.2008).
35. IFPRI. Biotechnology, Agriculture, and Food Security in Southern Africa', Washington, 2005.
36. Charles, H., Godfray, J., Beddington, R., Crute, I., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. and Toulmin, C. (2010): Food Security: The Challenge of feeding 9 Billion People. Science, 327, 812-818
37. FAO (2010): Livestock, Environment and Development: Greenhouse gas Emissions from the Dairy Sector: A Life cycle Assessment. www.fao.org/ agriculture/lead/themesO/climate/emissions/en/
38. Bundesinstitut für Verbraucherschutz und Nahrungsmittelsicherheit (2009): Beetle - Report: Long term effects of genetically modified (GM) crops on health and the environment (including biodiversity). www.bvl.bund.de/cln-027/ nn-495478/DE/06-Gentechnik/05-Inverkehrbringen/
39. Borggaard, O.K. und Gimsing, A.L., (2008): Fate of glyphosate in soil and the possibility of leaching to ground and surface waters: a review. Pest Management Science, 64, 441-456 (Pubitemid 351449468)
40. Licker, A., Jonston, M., Foley, J.A., Barford, C., Kucharik, C.J., Monfreda, C. and Ramunkutty, N. (2010): Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the 'yield gap' of croplands around the world? Global Ecology and Biogeography, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00563.x
41. Kim, H.S. and Ward, R.W. (1997): Genetic diversity in Eastern U.S. soft winter wheat based on RFLPs and coefficients of parentage. Theor. Appl. Genet., 94, 472-479 (Pubitemid 27164909)
42. Bundesverfassungsgericht (2010): Normenkontrollantrag in Sachen Gentechnikgesetz erfolglos. BVG - Pressemitteilung 108/2010, 24.11.2010