Safety risks for animals fed genetic modified (GM) plants

Veterinary Research Communications

Volumn 29, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2005, Pages 13-18

  Bertoni, Guiseppe ^a   Marsan, P Ajmone ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Domestic animals; Genetically modified organisms; Risk evaluation; Safety

Indexed keywords

DNA FRAGMENT; PESTICIDE; PLANT DNA;

ALLERGENICITY; ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL HEALTH; ARTICLE; DNA DETERMINATION; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD SAFETY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HEALTH HAZARD; LIVESTOCK; NONHUMAN; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENETICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; EUROPEAN UNION; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; RISK ASSESSMENT; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 27844551930     PISSN: 01657380     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11259-005-0004-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aumaitre, L.A., 2004. Safety assessment and feeding value for pigs, poultry and ruminant animals of pest protected (Bt) plants and herbicide tolerant (glyphosate, glufosinate) plants: Interpretation of experimental results observed worldwide on GM plants. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 3, 107-121
2. Barrière, Y., Vérité, R., Brunschwig, P., Surault, F. and Emile, J.C., 2001. Feeding value of corn silage estimated with sheep and dairy cows is not altered by genetic incorporation of Bt176 resistance to Ostrina nubilais. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 1863-1871 11518312
3. Castillo, A.R., Gallardo, M.R., Maciel, M., Giordano, J.M., Conti, G.A., Gaggiotti, M.C., Quaino, O., Gianni, C. and Hartnell, G.F., 2004. Effects of feeding rations with genetically modified whole cottonseed to lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Diary Science, 87, 1778-1785
4. Chassy, B.M., 2002. Food safety evaluation of crops produced through biotechnology. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 21 (3), 166S-173S 12071300
5. Chesson, A.C., 2001. Addressing the safety of GM food crops, food safety and food quality. Issues in Environmental Science and Technology.
6. Chowdhury, E.H., Kuribara, H., Hino, A., Sultana, P., Mikami, O., Shimada, N., Guruge, K.S., Saito, M. and Nakajima, Y., 2003. Detection of corn intrinsic and recombinant DNA fragments and Cry1Ab protein in the gastrointestinal content of pigs fed genetically modified corn Bt11. Journal of Animal Science, 81, 2546-2551 14552382
7. Clark, J.H. and Ipharraguerre, I.R., 2001. Livestock performance: Feeding biotech crops. Journal of Dairy Science, 84 (E. Suppl.), E9-E18
8. Commission of the European Communities, 1997. Commission recommendation of 29 July 1997 concerning the scientific aspects and the presentation of information necessary to support applications for the placing on the market of novel foods and novel food ingredients and the preparation of initial assessment reports under Regulation (EC) No. 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council. C(97) 2634 final. Official Journal of the European Communities, 40, L253/1-45
9. Dale, P.J., 2001. Environmental impact of biotech crops. Journal of Animal Science, 79 (E. Suppl.), E144-E147
10. Einspanier, R., Klots, A., Kraft, J., Aulrich, K., Poser, R., Schwägele, F., Jahreis, G. and Flachowsky, G., 2001. The fate of forage plant DNA in farm animals: A collaborative case-study investigation cattle and chicken fed recombinant plant material. European Food Research and Technology, 212, 129-134 10.1007/s002170000248
11. Faust, M.A., 2002. New feeds from genetically modified plants: The US approach to safety for animals and the food chain. Livestock Production Science, 74, 239-254 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00017-9
12. Flachowsky, G., Aulrich, K., Böhme, H. and Daenicke, R., 2000. GMO in animal nutrition - Results of experiments at our institute. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Feed Production Conference, Piacenza, 27-28 November 2000, pp. 291-307
13. Food and Agriculture Organization, 2000. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on foods derived from biotechnology. FAO, Rome
14. Hodges, J., 2000. Editorial: Polarization on genetically modified food. Livestock Production Science, 63, 159-200 10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00178-0
15. Jonas, D.A., Elmadfa, I., Engel, K.H., Heller, K.J., Kozianowski, G., Köning, A., Müller, D., Narbonne, J.F., Wackernagel, W. and Kleiner, J., 2001. Safety considerations of DNA in food. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 45, 235-254 10.1159/000046734
16. Jennings, J.C., Kolwyck, D.C., Kays, S.B., Whetsell, A.J., Suber, J.B., Cromwell, G.L., Lirette, R.P. and Glenn, K.C., 2003. Determining whether transgenic and endogenous plant DNA and transgenic protein are detectable in muscle from swine fed Roundup Ready soybean meal. Journal of Animal Science, 81, 1447-1455 12817492
17. Kuiper, H.A., Kok, E.J. and Noteborn, H.P.J.M., 2000. Profiling techniques to identify differences between foods derived from biotechnology and their counterparts. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on foods derived from biotechnology. FAO, Rome, pp. 2-12
18. ILSI, 2003. The safety assessment of novel foods and concepts to determine their safety in use. Expert Group Report Reviews at a Workshop held in November 2002. Organised by the ILSI Europe Novel Food Task Force
19. Phipps, R.H., Deaville, E.R. and Maddison, B.C., 2003. Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA in rumen fluid, duodenal digesta, milk, blood, and faeces of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 4070-4078 14740846
20. Rowland, I.R., 2002. Genetically modified foods, science, consumers and the media. Proceeding of the Nutrition Society, 61, 25-29