Variation in importance of time-on-task with familiarity with mobile phone models

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2551-2554

  Suzuki, Shunsuke ^a   Bellotti, Victoria ^b   Yee, Nick ^b   John, Bonnie E ^c   Nakao, Yusuke ^a   Asahi, Toshiyuki ^a   Fukuzumi, Shin'ichi ^a  

^a NEC CORPORATION   (Japan)

^b PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Expertise; Mobile phone; Time on task; Usability metrics

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; EXPERTISE; EXPERTS AND NOVICE USERS; NEGATIVE CORRELATION; PERCEIVED USABILITY; PURCHASE DECISION; TIME ON TASKS; USABILITY ASSESSMENT; USABILITY METRICS;

CELLULAR TELEPHONES;

EID: 79958188921     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979314     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Brooke, J. SUS: A 'quick and dirty' usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, and I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry (pp. 189-194), Taylor & Francis, London, (1996).
2. Card, S. K., Moran, T.P. and Newell, A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1983).
3. Frøkjær, E., Hertzum, M. and Hornbæk, K. Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? In Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 345-352.
4. th, 2010, http://ranking.goo.ne.jp/ ranking/065/mobile-use/.
5. th, 2010, http://ranking.goo.ne.jp/ranking/065/cellular-phone-function/.
6. Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M. and Koller, F. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In J. Ziegler and G. Szwillus (Eds.), Mensch & Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung (pp.187-196), B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart, (2003).
7. Hornbæk, K. and Law, E.L. Meta-Analysis of correlations among usability measures. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 617-626. (Pubitemid 47581650)
8. Karjaluoto, H., Karvonen, J., Kesti, M., Koivumäki, T., Manninen, M., Pakola, J., Ristola, A. and Salo, J. Factors affecting consumer choice of mobile phones: Two studies from Finland. Journal of Euromarketing 14, 3 (2005), 59-82. (Pubitemid 40742764)
9. th, 2010, http://www.myvoice.co.jp/biz/surveys/11601/ index.html.
10. th, 2010, http://pc.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/ column/20080919/1008086/.
11. th, 2010, http://life.oricon.co.jp/64543/full/#rk.
12. Quinn, J. M. and Tran, T. Q. Attractive phones don't have to work better: Independent effects of attractiveness, effectiveness, and efficiency on perceived usability. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 353-362.
13. Ryu, Y. S. Development of usability questionnaires for electronic mobile products and decision making methods, Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, (2005).
14. Ryu, Y. S., Suh, T. and Kim, H. S. Revising the mobile phone usability questionnaire (MPUQ): An item response theory approach. In Proc. Society of Marketing Advances 2008, (2008), 235-236.
15. Sauro, J. and Lewis, J.R. Correlations among prototypical usability metrics: evidence for the construct of usability. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 1609-1618.
16. th, 2010, http://www.measuringusability.com/usability-loyalty.php.
17. Seebode, J., Schaffer, S., Wechsung, I. and Metze, F. Influence of training on direct and indirect measures for the evaluation of multimodal systems. In Proc. Interspeech 2009, (2009), 300-303.
18. Suzuki, S., Nakao, Y., Asahi, T., Bellotti, V., Yee, N. and Fukuzumi, S. Empirical comparison of task completion time between mobile phone models with matched interaction sequences. In Proc. HCI International 2009, Springer (2009), 114-122.