What is the scanpath signature of syntactic reanalysis?

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 109-127

  Von der Malsburg, Titus ^a   Vasishth, Shravan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Individual differences; Parsing; Reading; Scanpaths; Syntactic reanalysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958176409     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974, 19(6):716-723.
2. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schaffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 1997, 25(17):3389.
3. Brandt S.A., Stark L.W. Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9:27-38.
4. Clifton C., Staub A., Rayner K. Eye movements in reading words and sentences. Eye movements: A window on mind and brain 2007, Elsevier Science Ltd., Amsterdam, Netherlands. R.V. Gompel (Ed.).
5. Cristino F., Mathôt S., Theeuwes J., Gilchrist I.D. ScanMatch: A novel method for comparing fixation sequences. Behavior Research Methods 2010, 42(3):692.
6. Daniel P.M., Whitteridge D. The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. The Journal of Physiology 1961, 159:203-221.
7. Engbert R., Nuthmann A., Richter E.M., Kliegl R. SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review 2005, 112:777-813.
8. Fodor J.D., Inoue A. Garden path repair: Diagnosis and triage. Language and Speech 2000, 43(3):261.
9. Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (2007). MCLUST version 3 for R: Normal mixture modeling and model-based clustering (Tech. Rep. No. 504). Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4322, USA.
10. Fraley C., Raftery A.E. How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. Computer Journal 1998, 41(8):578-588.
11. Fraley C., Raftery A.E. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2002, 97(458):611-632.
12. Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
13. Frazier L., Rayner K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 1982, 14:178-210.
14. Grodner D., Gibson E., Argaman V., Babyonyshev M. Against repair-based reanalysis in sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2003, 32:141.
15. Itti L., Koch C., Niebur E. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1998, 20(11):1254-1259.
16. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 1980, 87:329.
17. Kliegl R., Nuthmann A., Engbert R. Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 2005, 135:12-35.
18. Kruskal J. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 1964, 29:1-27.
19. Levenshtein V. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions and insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 1966, 10(8):707-710.
20. Lewis R.L. Reanalysis and limited repair parsing: Leaping off the garden path. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1998, 247-284.
21. Meseguer E., Carreiras M., Clifton C. Overt reanalysis strategies and eye movements during the reading of mild garden path sentences. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30.
22. Mitchell D.C., Shen X., Green M.J., Hodgson T.L. Accounting for regressive eye-movements in models of sentence processing: A reappraisal of the selective reanalysis hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:266-293.
23. Needleman S.B., Wunsch C.D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology 1970, 48(3):443-453.
24. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
25. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading: Models and data. Journal of Eye Movement Research 2009, 2(5):1-10.
26. Rayner K., Duffy S.A. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition 1986, 14:191-201.
27. R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer software manual], Vienna, Austria (ISBN 3-900051-07-0). <>. http://www.R-project.org.
28. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D., Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 1998, 105:125-157.
29. Reichle E.D., Warren T., McConnell K. Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher-level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:1-21.
30. Rovamo J., Virsu V., Näsänen R. Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision. Nature 1978, 271(5640):54-56.
31. Salvucci, D. D. (1999). Mapping eye movements to cognitive processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
32. Salvucci D.D., Anderson J.R. Automated eye-movement protocol analysis. Human-Computer Interaction 2001, 16(March):39-86.
33. Sammon J.W. A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Transactions on Computers 1969, 18(5):401-409.
34. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 1978, 6(2):461-464.
35. Sturt P., Pickering M.J., Crocker M.W. Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40:136-150.
36. Tanenhaus M., Trueswell J. Sentence processing. Speech, language, and communication 1995, Vol. 1:217-262. Academic Press, San Diego.
37. Underwood B.J. Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist 1975, 30:128-134.