Optimal planning model for school buildings considering the tradeoff of seismic resistance and cost effectiveness: A Taiwan case study

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 863-879

  Cheng, Min Yuan ^a   Chen, Ching Shan ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b CHAOYANG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Efficient frontier; Fuzzy theory; Indifference curve; Optimal planning model; Preference function; School buildings

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENT FRONTIER; FUZZY THEORY; INDIFFERENCE CURVE; OPTIMAL PLANNING; PREFERENCE FUNCTIONS;

ARCHITECTURE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; EXCAVATORS; FUZZY LOGIC; OPTIMIZATION; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; SEISMOLOGY;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

EID: 79958165525     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: 16151488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-010-0553-3     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. M Arja G Sauce B Souyri 2009 External uncertainty factors and LCC: a case study Build Res Inf 37 325 334 10.1080/09613210902863609
2. S Ashley 1990 The battle to build better products Mech Eng 109 34 38
3. Bodie Z, Kane A, Marcus AJ (2009) Essentials of investments, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston
4. D Celebi D Bayraktar 2008 An integrated neural network and data envelopment analysis for supplier evaluation under incomplete information Expert Syst Appl 35 1698 1710 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.107
5. Ö Cengiz ÎÜ Ali 2007 Commonly encountered seismic design faults due to the architectural design of residential buildings in Turkey Build Environ 42 1406 1416 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.029 (Pubitemid 44774635)
6. Chang JS, Lyu GW (2000) Earthquake resistance evaluation and retrofit of elementary and junior high school buildings-common structural systems of school buildings. National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei
7. JS Chang MH Hsu NG Cheng CH Chen 1991 Ming-Li elementary school, 13-14 December 1990, discussion on seismic hazards of buildings Struct Eng 6 79 102 (in Chinese)
8. A Charnes WW Cooper E Rhodes 1978 Measuring the efficiency of decision making units Eur J Oper Res 2 429 444 525905 0416.90080 10.1016/0377-2217(78) 90138-8 (Pubitemid 9402758)
9. Chen CS, Chen HA, Guo CY (2008) Seismic model of elementary and junior high school buildings in Taichung City by Neural Network and Principal Component Analysis. National Science Council Project No.: NSC 96-2221-E-324-050
10. Chuang CL, Chiang TA, Che ZH, Wang HS (2009) Using DEA and GA algorithm for finding an optimal design chain partner combination. Advanced Concurrent Engineering (part 3): 117-127
11. Chung LL, Hwang SJ et al (2005) Investigation of earthquake resistance of typical elementary and junior high school buildings. National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering Project No.: NCREE-05-007
12. Coello Coello CA (1996) An empirical study of evolutionary techniques for multi-objective optimization in engineering design. PhD thesis, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
13. J Colton M Pecht 1991 An integrated, intelligent design environment Eng Comput-Germany 7 11 22
14. VAC da Graça DCCK Kowaltowski JRD Petreche 2007 An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimization of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of the State São Paulo in Brazil Build Environ 42 984 999 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.10.020 (Pubitemid 44467720)
15. TD Daniel K Moncef 2010 Genetic-algorithm based approach to optimize building envelope design for residential buildings Build Environ 45 1574 1581 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.005
16. E Eshtehardian A Afshar R Abbasnia 2009 Fuzzy-based MOGA approach to stochastic time-cost trade-off problem Autom Constr 18 692 701 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.02.001
17. Hsiao CB (1999) 921 Chi- Chi earthquake comprehensive reconnaissance report- building damaged investigation. National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Project No.:NCREE99-031
18. Hwang SJ, Chung LL et al (2005) Implementation plan of earthquake resistance evaluation and retrofit of national elementary and junior high school buildings. National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering Project No.: NCREE-05-008
19. Johan A (2000) A survey of multi-objective optimization in engineering design. Technical Report LiTH-IKP-R-1097. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linkoping University, Linkoping
20. S Khajehpour DE Grierson 2003 Profitability versus safety of high-rise office building Struct Multidisc Optim 25 279 293 10.1007/s00158-003-0297-4
21. AK Lars O Niels 1999 Optimum topology and reinforcement design of disk and plate structures with multiple stiffness and eigenfrequency objectives Comput Struct 72 535 563 1050.74644 10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00326-5
22. H Li N Chan T Huang HL Guo W Lu M Skitmore 2009 Optimizing construction planning schedules by virtual prototyping enabled resource analysis Autom Constr 18 912 918 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.04.002
23. EG Maged LM Chang Z Lei 2005 Utility-function model for engineering performance assessment J Constr Eng Manag 131 558 568 10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9364(2005)131:5(558) (Pubitemid 40665726)
24. Mankiw NG (2008) Principles of economics, 5th edn. South-Western College Pub, Boston
25. JF McGeorge 1988 Design productivity: a quality problem J Manage Eng 4 350 362 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1988)4:4(350)
26. G Michael JB John C Chen B Ralph 1987 A comparison of interactive multiple-objective decision making procedures Comput Oper Res 14 97 105 0617.90049 10.1016/0305-0548(87)90002-5 (Pubitemid 17556075)
27. Min L (2003) Development of multiobjective optimization procedures for seismic design of steel moment frame structures, PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
28. ME Nissen MN Kamel K Sengupta 2000 Integrated knowledge process and systems design Inf Resour Manage J 13 24 43 10.4018/irmj.2000010103
29. KN Otto EK Antonsson 1991 Trade-off strategies in engineering design Res Eng Des 3 87 104 10.1007/BF01581342
30. K Peippo PD Lund E Vartiainen 1999 Multivariate optimization of design trade-offs for solar low energy buildings Energ Buildings 29 189 205 10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00055-3
31. AD Radford JS Gero 1980 On optimization in computer aided architectural design Build Environ 15 73 80 10.1016/0360-1323(80)90011-6 (Pubitemid 11430092)
32. YT Wang JS Chang CC Chen CP Wu 2006 Structure investigation of existing school buildings in Tainan County J Archit 58 1 18 (in Chinese)
33. W Weimin Z Radu R Hugues 2005 Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization Build Environ 40 1512 1525
34. WM Wey YH Chang 2008 A comparative location study for the joint development station of a mass rapid transit system: a case of Taichung City in Taiwan Environ Plann B 4 573 587
35. KL Wood EK Antonsson 1989 Computations with imprecise parameters in engineering designs: background and theory ASME J Mech Trans Autom Des 111 616 625 10.1115/1.3259045 (Pubitemid 20635904)
36. LA Zadeh 1965 Fuzzy sets Inf Control 8 338 353 219427 0139.24606 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
37. A Zekeriya A Yusuf 2010 Optimum topology and shape design of prestressed concrete bridge girders using a genetic algorithm Struct Multidisc Optim 41 151 162 10.1007/s00158-009-0404-2
38. Zimmermann HJ (2001) Fuzzy set theory and its applications, 4th edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht
39. Zou X (2002) Optimal seismic performance-based design of reinforced concrete buildings. PhD thesis, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China