Domain-specific giftedness: Applications in school and life

Conceptions of Giftedness: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 358-376

  VanTassel Baska, Joyce ^a  

^a Dept of Economics and Thomas Jefferson Program in Public Policy at the College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958126284     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610455.021     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Adler, M. J. (1984). The Paideia program: An educational syllabus. New York: Macmillan.
2. Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. Anderson, L. W. (2003). Classroom assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Assouline, S. (1997). Performance on specific tests. Vision (Spring). Iowa City, IA: Belin-Blank Center for Gifted and Talent Development.
5. Bamberger, J. (1975). The development of musical intelligence: Strategies for representing simple rhythms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1996). Intellectual talent. Baltimore: John’s Hopkins Press.
7. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1996). Inequity in equity: How “equity” can lead to inequity for high-potential students. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 249-292.
8. Berlin, D. F. (1991). A bibliography of integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning literature. School Science and Mathematics Association topics for teachers series, no. 6. Bowling Green, OH: School Science and Mathematics Association.
9. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171.
10. Bracken, B. A. (2000, April). An approach for identifying under-represented populations for G/T programs: The UNIT Test. Paper presented at graduate seminar, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
11. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work. New York: Basic Books.
14. Davison, D. M., Miller, K. W., & Methany, D. L. (1995). What does integration of science and mathematics really mean? School Science and Mathematics, 95, 226-230.
15. Dimitriou, A., & Valanides, N. (1998). A three-level theory of the developing mind: Basic principles and implications for instruction and assessment. In R. Sternberg&W.Williams (Eds.), Intelligence, instruction and assessment(pp. 149-199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Feldman, D. H., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1991). Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Ford, D. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted black students: Promising programs and practices. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. London: Paladin.
20. Gardner, H. (1991). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
21. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books.
22. Gruber, H. (1981). Darwin on man:Apsychological study of scientific creativity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
24. Karnes, F. A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children, 66, 219-238.
25. Kirschenbaum, R. J. (1998). Dynamic assessment and its use with underserved gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 140-147.
26. Maker, C. J., & Nielson, A. B. (1996). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
27. Maker, C. J., Nielson, A. B., & Rogers, J. A. (1994). Multiple intelligences: Giftedness, diversity, and problem-solving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(1), 4-19.
28. Mills, C., & Tissot, S. (1995). Identifying academic potential in students from underrepresented populations: Is using the Ravens Progressive Matrices a good idea? Gifted Child Quarterly,39, 209-217.
29. Naglieri, J. A. (1999). The essentials of CAS assessment. New York: Wiley.
30. Ochse, R. (1990). Before the gates of excellence: Determinants of creative genius. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2003). Special summer and Saturday programs for gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education(3rd ed.) (pp. 219-228). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
32. Passow, A. H., & Frasier, M. M. (1996). Toward improving identification of talent potential among minority and disadvantaged students. Roeper Review, 18, 198-202.
33. Phenix, P. (1964). Realms of meaning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity. Scottsdale, AZ: Arizona Great Potential Press.
35. Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Emerging conceptions of giftedness: Building a bridge to the new century. Exceptionality, 10(2), 67-75.
36. Schulman, L. (1996).Newassessment practices in mathematics. Journal of Education, 178, 61-71.
37. Schwab, J. (Ed.). (1964). Education and the structure of knowledge. Chicago: Rand McNally.
38. Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford.
39. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Simon & Schuster
41. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond I.Q. New York: Basic Books.
42. Swiatek, M. A., & Benbow, C. P. (1991).Aten-year longitudinal follow-up of abilitymatched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 528-538.
43. Tannenbaum, A. (1996). The IQ controversy and the gifted. In Benbow&Lubinski’s (Eds.) Intellectual talent(pp. 44-77). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
44. Tierney, R. J., Carter, M. A., & Desi, L. E. (1991). Portfolio assessment in the readingwriting classroom. Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
45. Treffinger, D. J. (1998). From gifted education to programming for talent development. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(10), 752-755.
46. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1995). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners(2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
47. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1998). Excellence in educating the gifted(3rd ed.). Denver: Love.
48. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2000). Curriculum policy development for secondary gifted programs: A prescription for reform coverage. NASSP Bulletin, 14-29.
49. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2003). Curriculum planning and instructional design for gifted learners. Denver: Love.
50. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Avery, L., Ries, R., & Poland, D. (1998). A national pilot study of science curriculum effectiveness for high-ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 200-211.
51. Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Feng, A. (2004). Designing and utilizing evaluation for gifted program improvement. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
52. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Patton, J., & Prillaman, D. (1991). Gifted youth at risk: A report of a national study. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
53. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Zuo, L., Avery, L., & Little, C. (2002). A curriculum study of gifted student learning in the language arts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 30-44.
54. Ward, V. (1980). Differential education for the gifted. Ventura, CA: Office of Ventura County Superintendent of Schools.
55. Wiggins, G. (1992). Creating tests worth taking. Educational Leadership, 49(8), 26-33.