Representing users in accessibility research

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2235-2238

  Sears, Andrew ^a   Hanson, Vicki L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Accessible computing; Disabilities; Inclusion; Older adults; Representative users

Indexed keywords

USER INTERFACES;

ACCESSIBILITY; ACCESSIBLE COMPUTING; DISABILITY; INCLUSIVE DESIGN; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; OLDER ADULTS; REPRESENTATIVE USER; VARIOUS TECHNOLOGIES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 79958111002     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979268     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bigham, J. and Cavender, A. Evaluating existing audio CAPTCHAs and an interface optimized for non-visual use. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 1829-1838.
2. Dijkers, M. When the best is the enemy of the good: The nature of research evidence used in systematic reviews and guidelines. Austin, TX: SEDL (2009).
3. Fairweather, P. How older and younger adults differ in their approach to problem solving on a complex website. In Proc. ASSETS 2008, ACM Press (2008), 67-72
4. Ferres, L., Lindgaard, G., and Sumegi, L. Evaluating a tool for improving accessibility to charts and graphs. In Proc. ASSETS 2010, ACM Press (2010), 83-90.
5. Gajos, K., Wobbrock, J., and Weld, D. Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically-generated, ability-based interfaces. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1257-1266.
6. Heller, M. Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and the blind: the advantage of the late blind. Perception 18, 3 (1989), 379-389. (Pubitemid 19227951)
7. Hirano, S., Yeganyan, M., Marcu, G., Nguyen, D., Boyd, L., and Hayes, G. vSked: Evaluation of a system to support classroom activities for children with autism. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1633-1642.
8. Huenerfauth, M., Zhao, L., Gu, E., and Allbeck, J. Evaluating American Sign Language generation through the participation of native ASL signers. In Proc. ASSETS 2007, ACM Press (2007), 211-218. (Pubitemid 351528380)
9. Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., King, N., and Pavan, P. Remote usability evaluations with disabled people. In Proc CHI '06, ACM Press (2006), 1133-1141. (Pubitemid 44032209)
10. Price, K., and Sears, A. The Development and Evaluation of Performance-Based Functional Assessment: A Methodology for the Measurement of Physical Capabilities. ACM Trans. on Access. Comput., 2, 2 (2009), 31 pages.
11. Shinohara, K., and Tenenberg, J. Observing Sara: A Case Study of a Blind Person's Interactions with Technology. In Proc. ASSETS 2007, ACM Press (2007), 171-178. (Pubitemid 351528375)
12. Schlosser, R. The role of single-subject experimental designs in evidence-based practice times. FOCUS, 22 (2009), 1-8.
13. Sears, A., Karat, C-M., Oseitutu, K., Karimullah, A., and Feng, J. Productivity, satisfaction, and interaction strategies of individual with spinal cord injuries and traditional users interacting with speech recognition software. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1 (2001), 4-15.
14. Stevens, R., and Edwards, A. An approach to the evaluation of assistive technology. In Proc. ASSETS '96. ACM Press (1996), 64-71.
15. Trewin, S., Laff, M., Hanson, V., and Cavender, A. Exploring Visual and Motor Accessibility in Navigating a Virtual World. ACM Trans. on Access. Comput., 2, 2 (2009), 35 pages.
16. Walker, B. and Mauney, L. Universal Design of Auditory Graphs: A Comparison of Sonification Mappings for Visually Impaired and Sighted Listeners. ACM Trans. on Access. Comput. 2, 3, (2010), 16 pages.