An image-based approach to understanding the physics of MR artifacts

Radiographics

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 849-856

  Morelli, John N ^a   Runge, Val M ^b   Ai, Fei ^c   Attenberger, Ulrike ^d   Vu, Lan ^a   Schmeets, Stuart H ^e   Nitz, Wolfgang R ^e   Kirsch, John E ^f  

^a TEXAS A AND M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

^c TONGJI HOSPITAL OF TONGJI MEDICAL COLLEGE OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^e Healthcare Sector   (Germany)

^f SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICS; PULSATILE FLOW;

ARTIFACTS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MOVEMENT; PHYSICS; PULSATILE FLOW;

EID: 79958071014     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.313105115     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Golfieri R, Cherryman GR, Olliff JF, Husband JE. Comparative evaluation of computerized tomography/magnetic resonance (1.5 T) in the detection of brain metastasis [in Italian]. Radiol Med 1991;82 (1-2):27-34.
2. Rosenberg ZS, Cheung Y, Jahss MH, Noto AM, Norman A, Leeds NE. Rupture of posterior tibial tendon: CT and MR imaging with surgical correlation. Radiology 1988;169(1):229-235.
3. Brazzelli M, Sandercock PA, Chappell FM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009 (4):CD007424.
4. Friedman AC, Seidmon EJ, Radecki PD, Lev-Toaff A, Caroline DF. Relative merits of MRI, transrectal endosonography and CT in diagnosis and staging of carcinoma of prostate. Urology 1988;31(6): 530-537.
5. Sheldon JJ, Siddharthan R, Tobias J, Sheremata WA, Soila K, Viamonte M Jr. MR imaging of multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical and CT examinations in 74 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;145 (5):957-964.
6. Gloviczki ML, Glockner J, Gomez SI, et al. Comparison of 1.5 and 3 T BOLD MR to study oxygenation of kidney cortex and medulla in human renovascular disease. Invest Radiol 2009;44(9):566-571.
7. Lucht RE, Delorme S, Hei J, et al. Classification of signal-time curves obtained by dynamic magnetic resonance mammography: statistical comparison of quantitative methods. Invest Radiol 2005;40(7): 442-447.
8. Eiber M, Beer AJ, Holzapfel K, et al. Preliminary results for characterization of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer by diffusion-weighted MR-imaging. Invest Radiol 2010;45(1):15-23.
9. Voth M, Haneder S, Huck K, Gutfleisch A, Schönberg SO, Michaely HJ. Peripheral magnetic resonance angiography with continuous table movement in combination with high spatial and temporal resolution time-resolved MRA with a total single dose (0.1 mmol/kg) of gadobutrol at 3.0 T. Invest Radiol 2009;44(9):627-633.
10. Wood ML, Henkelman RM. MR image artifacts from periodic motion. Med Phys 1985;12(2): 143-151.
11. Henkelman RM, Hardy PA, Bishop JE, Poon CS, Plewes DB. Why fat is bright in RARE and fast spinecho imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992;2(5): 533-540.
12. Fink C, Puderbach M, Biederer J, et al. Lung MRI at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: observer preference study and lesion contrast using five different pulse sequences. Invest Radiol 2007;42(6):377-383.
13. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47(6): 1202-1210.
14. Glockner JF, Hu HH, Stanley DW, Angelos L, King K. Parallel MR imaging: a user's guide. Radio- Graphics 2005;25(5):1279-1297.
15. Runge VM, Case RS, Sonnier HL. Advances in clinical 3-tesla neuroimaging. Invest Radiol 2006;41(2): 63-67.
16. Attenberger UI, Runge VM, Stemmer A, et al. Diffusion weighted imaging: a comprehensive evaluation of a fast spin echo DWI sequence with BLADE (PROPELLER) k-space sampling at 3 T, using a 32-channel head coil in acute brain ischemia. Invest Radiol 2009;44(10):656-661.
17. Wintersperger BJ, Runge VM, Biswas J, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla using BLADE compared with standard rectilinear data sampling. Invest Radiol 2006;41(7):586-592.
18. Bailes DR, Gilderdale DJ, Bydder GM, Collins AG, Firmin DN. Respiratory ordered phase encoding (ROPE): a method for reducing respiratory motion artefacts in MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9(4):835-838.
19. Zhuo J, Gullapalli RP. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: MR artifacts, safety, and quality control. RadioGraphics 2006;26(1):275-297.
20. Hinks RS, Constable RT. Gradient moment nulling in fast spin echo. Magn Reson Med 1994;32(6): 698-706.
21. Morelli JN, Runge VM, Feiweier T, Kirsch JE, Williams KW, Attenberger UI. Evaluation of a modified Stejskal-Tanner diffusion encoding scheme, permitting a marked reduction in TE, in diffusion weighted imaging of stroke patients at 3 T. Invest Radiol 2010;45(1):29-35.
22. Reese TG, Heid O, Weisskoff RM, Wedeen VJ. Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo. Magn Reson Med 2003;49(1):177-182.
23. Erturk SM, Alberich-Bayarri A, Herrmann KA, Marti-Bonmati L, Ros PR. Use of 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluation of the abdomen. RadioGraphics 2009;29(6):1547-1563.
24. Olsen RV, Munk PL, Lee MJ, et al. Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. RadioGraphics 2000;20(3):699-712.
25. Lee MJ, Kim S, Lee SA, et al. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-fieldstrength MR imaging and multidetector CT. RadioGraphics 2007;27(3):791-803.
26. Olsrud J, Lätt J, Brockstedt S, Romner B, Björkman-Burtscher IM. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22 (3):433-437.
27. Hood MN, Ho VB, Smirniotopoulos JG, Szumowski J. Chemical shift: the artifact and clinical tool revisited. RadioGraphics 1999;19(2):357-371.
28. Wood ML, Henkelman RM. Truncation artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1985;2(6):517-526.