Efficient and reproducible mammalian cell bioprocesses without probes and controllers?

New Biotechnology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 382-390

  Tissot, Stéphanie ^a   Oberbek, Agata ^a   Reclari, Martino ^a   Dreyer, Matthieu ^a   Hacker, David L ^a   Baldi, Lucia ^a   Farhat, Mohamed ^a   Wurm, Florian M ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOPROCESSES; CELL DENSITY; CELL VIABILITY; CHO CELL; CULTURE MEDIUM; DISSOLVED OXYGEN CONCENTRATIONS; DO CONTROL; FUSION PROTEINS; GAS ENVIRONMENT; GAS TRANSFER; MAMMALIAN CELLS; MIXING INTENSITY; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN PRODUCTIONS; REPRODUCIBILITIES; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR RECEPTORS; VOLUMETRIC MASS TRANSFER COEFFICIENT; VOLUMETRIC POWER CONSUMPTION;

ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; BIOREACTORS; CARBON DIOXIDE; DISSOLVED OXYGEN; DISSOLVED OXYGEN SENSORS; MAMMALS; MASS TRANSFER; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES; PROTEINS; VOLUMETRIC ANALYSIS;

CELLS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; DISSOLVED OXYGEN; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR RECEPTOR;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOPROCESS; BIOREACTOR; CELL DENSITY; CELL VIABILITY; CHO CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GAS DIFFUSION; MAMMAL CELL; NONHUMAN; ORBITALLY SHAKEN BIOREACTOR; PARAMETER; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; STIRRED TANK BIOREACTOR; VOLUMETRIC POWER CONSUMPTION;

ANIMALS; CHO CELLS; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 79958043751     PISSN: 18716784     EISSN: 18764347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2011.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Muller N., et al. Orbital shaker technology for the cultivation of mammalian cells in suspension. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 89(4):400-406.
2. Stettler M., et al. Novel orbital shake bioreactors for transient production of CHO derived IgGs. Biotechnol. Prog. 2007, 23(6):1340-1346.
3. Zhang X., et al. Use of orbital shaken disposable bioreactors for mammalian cell cultures from the milliliter-scale to the 1,000-liter scale. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2009, 1-21.
4. Lara A.R., et al. Living with heterogeneities in bioreactors: understanding the effects of environmental gradients on cells. Mol. Biotechnol. 2006, 34(3):355-381.
5. Zlokarnik M. Stirring. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Electronic Release 2003, Wiley-VCH. 7th edn.
6. Tissot S., et al. Determination of a scale-up factor from mixing time studies in orbitally shaken bioreactors. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 52:181-186.
7. Xing Z., et al. Scale-up analysis for a CHO cell culture process in large-scale bioreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103(4):733-746.
8. Zhang X., et al. Efficient oxygen transfer by surface aeration in shaken cylindrical containers for mammalian cell cultivation at volumetric scales up to 1000L. Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 45(1):41-47.
9. Bonvillani P., Ferrari M.P., et al. Theoretical and experimental study of the effects of scale-up on mixing time for a stirred-tank bioreactor. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 23(1):1-7.
10. Garcia-Ochoa F., et al. Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: an overview. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27(2):153-176.
11. Marks D.M. Equipment design considerations for large scale cell culture. Cytotechnology 2003, 42(1):21-33.
12. Marques M.P.C., et al. Bioprocess scale-up: quest for the parameters to be used as criterion tomove from microreactors to lab-scale. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85:1184-1198.
13. Chu L., et al. Industrial choices for protein production by large-scale cell culture. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2001, 12(2):180-187.
14. Nienow A.W. Reactor engineering in large scale animal cell culture. Cytotechnology 2006, 50(1-3):9-33.
15. Merten O-W. Introduction to animal cell culture technology - past, present and future. Cytotechnology 2006, 50(1-3):1-7.
16. Langer E. Fifth Annual Report and Survey of Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing Capacity and Production 2008, BioPlan Associates.
17. Melton L.A., et al. DISMT - determination of mixing time through color changes. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2002, 189(3):322-338.
18. Gupta A., Rao G. A study of oxygen transfer in shake flasks using a non-invasive oxygen sensor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 84(3):351-358.
19. Sumino Y., et al. Performance of the shaking flask. I. Power consumption. J. Ferment. Technol. 1972, 50(3):203-208.
20. Büchs J., et al. Power consumption in shaking flasks on rotary shaking machines: I. Power consumption measurement in unbaffled flasks at low liquid viscosity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 68(6):589-593.
21. Kato Y., et al. Power consumption and heat transfer resistance in large rotary shaking vessels. Biochem. Eng. J. 2004, 21:83-91.
22. Oberbek A., et al. Generation of stable, high-producing CHO cell lines by lentiviral vector-mediated gene transfer in serum-free suspension culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108(3):600-610.
23. Zhang X., et al. New disposable tubes for rapid and precise biomass assessment for suspension cultures of mammalian cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 95(6):1228-1233.
24. Meissner P., et al. Transient gene expression: recombinant protein production with suspension-adapted HEK293-EBNA cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 75(2):197-203.
25. Ma N., et al. Fabrication and use of a transient contractional flow device to quantify the sensitivity of mammalian and insect cells to hydrodynamic forces. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 80(4):428-437.
26. Mollet M., et al. Bioprocess equipment: characterization of energy dissipation rate and its potential to damage cells. Biotechnol. Prog. 2004, 20(5):1437-1448.
27. Melville W.K. The role of surface-wave breaking in air-sea interaction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1996, 28:279-321.
28. Doblhoff-Dier O., Bliem R. Quality control and assurance from the development to the production of biopharmaceuticals. Trends Biotechnol. 1999, 17(7):266-270.