Suppressive mechanisms in monkey V1 help to solve the stereo correspondence problem

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 31, Issue 22, 2011, Pages 8295-8305

  Tanabe, Seiji ^a   Haefner, Ralf M ^b   Cumming, Bruce G ^a  

^a NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPATIAL SUMMATION; STEREO CORRESPONDENCE PROBLEM; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STRIATE CORTEX; SYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; THALAMOCORTICAL TRACT; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79958031282     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5000-10.2011     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (1999) Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information II. Complex cells. J Neurophysiol 82: 909-924.
2. Cumming BG, Parker AJ (1997) Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception. Nature 389: 280-283.
3. Cumming BG, Parker AJ (2000) Local disparity not perceived depth is signaled by binocular neurons in cortical area V1 of the macaque. J Neurosci 20:4758-4767.
4. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (1991) Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure. Nature 352: 156-159.
5. de Ruyter van Steveninck R, Bialek W (1988) Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: coding and information transfer in short spike sequences. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 234:379-414.
6. Fleet DJ, Wagner H, Heeger DJ (1996) Neural encoding of binocular disparity: energy models, position shifts and phase shifts. Vision Res 36: 1839-1857.
7. Haefner RM, Cumming BG (2008) Adaptation to natural binocular disparities in primate V1 explained by a generalized energy model. Neuron 57:147-158.
8. Hirsch JA, Alonso JM, Reid RC, Martinez LM (1998) Synaptic integration in striate cortical simple cells. J Neurosci 18:9517-9528.
9. Horwitz GD, Chichilnisky EJ, Albright TD (2005) Blue-yellow signals are enhanced by spatiotemporal luminance contrast in macaque V1. J Neurophysiol 93:2263-2278.
10. Hunter IW, Korenberg MJ (1986) The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Wiener and Hammerstein cascade models. Biol Cybern 55:135-144.
11. Julesz B (1971) Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago.
12. Mardia KV, Jupp PE (1999) Directional statistics (Wiley series in probability and statistics). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
13. Marmarelis VZ, Citron MC, Vivo CP (1986) Minimum-order Wiener modelling of spike-output systems. Biol Cybern 54:115-123.
14. Marr D, Poggio T (1979) A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 204:301-328.
15. Menz MD, Freeman RD (2004a) Temporal dynamics of binocular disparity processing in the central visual pathway. J Neurophysiol 91:1782-1793.
16. Menz MD, Freeman RD (2004b) Functional connectivity of disparity-tuned neurons in the visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 91:1794-1807.
17. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD (1990) Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science 249:1037-1041.
18. Poggio GF, Gonzalez F, Krause F (1988) Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity. J Neurosci 8:4531-4550.
19. Priebe NJ, Ferster D (2005) Direction selectivity of excitation and inhibition in simple cells of the cat primary visual cortex. Neuron 45:133-145.
20. Prince SJ, Pointon AD, Cumming BG, Parker AJ (2002) Quantitative analysis of the responses of V1 neurons to horizontal disparity in dynamic random-dot stereograms. J Neurophysiol 87:191-208.
21. Read JC, Cumming BG (2003) Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 90:2795-2817.
22. Read JC, Cumming BG (2007) Sensors for impossible stimuli may solve the stereo correspondence problem. Nat Neurosci 10:1322-1328.
23. Rust NC, Schwartz O, Movshon JA, Simoncelli EP (2005) Spatiotemporal elements of macaque v1 receptive fields. Neuron 46:945-956.
24. Sakai HM, Naka K, Korenberg MJ (1988) White-noise analysis in visual neuroscience. Vis Neurosci 1:287-296.
25. Schwartz O, Pillow JW, Rust NC, Simoncelli EP (2006) Spike-triggered neural characterization. J Vis 6:484-507.
26. Tanabe S, Cumming BG (2008) Mechanisms underlying the transformation of disparity signals from V1 to V2 in the macaque. J Neurosci 28:11304-11314.
27. Touryan J, Lau B, Dan Y (2002) Isolation of relevant visual features from random stimuli for cortical complex cells. J Neurosci 22:10811-10818.
28. Troyer TW, Krukowski AE, Priebe NJ, Miller KD (1998) Contrast-invariant orientation tuning in cat visual cortex: thalamocortical input tuning and correlation-based intracortical connectivity. J Neurosci 18:5908-5927.
29. Wilson HR, Blake R, Halpern DL (1991) Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. J Opt Soc Am A 8:229-236.
30. Zhu YD, Qian N (1996) Binocular receptive field models, disparity tuning, and characteristic disparity. Neural Comput 8:1611-1641.