Temporal Dynamics of Binocular Disparity Processing in the Central Visual Pathway

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1782-1793

  Menz, Michael D ^a   Freeman, Ralph D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b 360 Minor Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CAT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; LATERAL GENICULATE BODY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; STEREOSCOPIC VISION;

ANIMALS; CATS; CRANIOTOMY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GENICULATE BODIES; NEURONS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 1542510710     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00571.2003     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adelson EH and Bergen JR. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A 2: 284-299, 1985.
2. Anderson CH and Van Essen DC. Shifter circuits: a computational strategy for dynamic aspects of visual processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 6297-6301, 1987.
3. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Neural mechanisms for encoding binocular disparity: receptive field position versus phase. J Neurophysiol 82: 874-890, 1999a.
4. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information. I. Simple cells. J Neurophysiol 82: 891-908, 1999b.
5. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Joint-encoding of motion and depth by visual cortical neurons: neural basis of the Pulfrich effect. Nat Neurosci 4: 513-518, 2001.
6. Ben-Yishai R, Bar-Or RL, and Sompolinsky H. Theory of orientation tuning in visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 3844-3848, 1995.
7. Best J, Mallot H, Kruger K, and Dinse HRO. Dynamics of visual information processing in cortical systems. In: Neural Networks: From Models to Applications, edited by Personnaz L and Dreyfus G. Paris, France: IDSET, 1989, p. 107-116.
8. Bishop PO, Kozak W, and Vakkur GJ. Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of references, visual field coordinates and optics. J Physiol 163: 466-502, 1962.
9. Bredfeldt CE and Ringach DL. Dynamics of V1 neurons in the fourier domain. Soc Neurosci Abstr 26: 2090, 2000.
10. Bredfeldt CE and Ringach DL. Dynamics of spatial frequency tuning in macaque V1. J Neurosci 22: 1976-1984, 2002.
11. Cai D, DeAngelis GC, and Freeman RD. Spatiotemporal receptive field organization in the lateral geniculate nucleus of cats and kittens. J Neurophysiol 78: 1045-1061, 1997.
12. Celebrini S, Thorpe S, Trotter Y, and Imbert M. Dynamics of orientation coding in area V1 of the awake primate. Vis Neurosci 10: 811-825, 1993.
13. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Neuronal mechanisms underlying stereopsis: how do simple cells in the visual cortex encode binocular disparity? Perception 24: 3-31, 1995.
14. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. J Neurophysiol 69: 1091-1117, 1993a.
15. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. J Neurophysiol 69: 1118-1135, 1993b.
16. Douglas RJ, Koch C, Mahowald M, Martin KA, and Suarez HH. Recurrent excitation in neocortical circuits. Science 269: 981-985, 1995.
17. Fleet DJ, Wagner H, and Heeger DJ. Neural encoding of binocular disparity: energy models, position shifts and phase shifts. Vision Res 36: 1839-1857, 1996.
18. Freeman RD and Ohzawa I. On the neurophysiological organization of binocular vision. Vision Res 30: 1661-1676, 1990.
19. Glennerster A. The time course of 2-D shape discrimination in random dot stereograms. Vision Res 36: 1955-1968, 1996.
20. Hubel DH and Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture of the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 160: 106-154, 1962.
21. Jones JP and Palmer LA. The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58: 1187-1211, 1987.
22. Mallot HA, Gillner S, and Arndt PA. Is correspondence search in human stereo vision a coarse-to-fine process? Biol Cybern 74: 95-106, 1996.
23. Marr D and Poggio T. A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 204: 301-328, 1979.
24. Mazer JA, Vinje WE, McDermott J, Schiller PH, and Gallant JL. Spatial frequency and orientation tuning dynamics in area V1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 1645-1650, 2002.
25. Menz MD and Freeman RD. Stereoscopic depth processing in the visual cortex: a coarse-to-fine mechanism. Nat Neurosci 6: 59-65, 2003.
26. Nishihara HK. Practical real-time imaging stereo matcher. Opt Eng 23: 536-545, 1984.
27. Nishihara M and Kimura F. Differential influences of adrenoceptor agonists on the excitability of arcuate and medial preoptic neurons. Nippon Juigaku Zasshi 49: 1154-1156, 1987.
28. Nomura M. A model for neural representation of binocular disparity in striate cortex: distributed representation and veto mechanism. Biol Cybern 69: 165-171, 1993.
29. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, and Freeman RD. Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science 249: 1037-1041, 1990.
30. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, and Freeman RD. Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 77: 2879-2909, 1997.
31. Parker DM, Lishman JR, and Hughes J. Evidence for the view that temporospatial integration in vision is temporally anisotropic. Perception 26: 1169-1180, 1997.
32. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, and Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992.
33. Qian N and Andersen RA. Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. II. Physiology. J Neurosci 14: 7367-7380, 1994.
34. Qian N, Andersen RA, and Adelson EH. Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics. J Neurosci 14: 7357-7366, 1994.
35. Qian N and Zhu Y. Physiological computation of binocular disparity. Vision Res 37: 1811-1827, 1997.
36. Quam LH. Readings in Computer Vision. Los Altos, CA: Kauffman, 1987.
37. Ringach DL, Hawken MJ, and Shapley R. Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex. Nature 387: 281-284, 1997.
38. Ringach DL, Hawken MJ, and Shapley R. Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque V1: the role of global and tuned suppression. J Neurophysiol 90: 342-352, 2003.
39. Rohaly AM and Wilson HR. Disparity averaging across spatial scales. Vision Res 34: 1315-1325, 1994.
40. Rohaly AM and Wilson HR. Nature of coarse-to-fine constraints on binocular fusion. J Opt Soc Am A 10: 2433-2441, 1993.
41. Schor CM, Edwards M, and Pope DR. Spatial-frequency and contrast tuning of the transient-stereopsis system. Vision Res 38: 3057-3068, 1998.
42. Skottun BC, De Valois RL, Grosof DH, Movshon JA, Albrecht DG, and Bonds AB. Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation. Vision Res 31: 1079-1086, 1991.
43. Smallman HS. Fine-to-coarse scale disambiguation in stereopsis. Vision Res 35: 1047-1060, 1995.
44. Smallman HS and MacLeod DI. Spatial scale interactions in stereo sensitivity and the neural representation of binocular disparity. Perception 26: 977-994, 1997.
45. Somers DC, Nelson SB, and Sur M. An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells. J Neurosci 15: 5448-5465, 1995.
46. Suder K, Funke K, Zhao Y, Kerscher N, Wennekers T, and Worgotter F. Spatial dynamics of receptive fields in cat primary visual cortex related to the temporal structure of thalamocortical feedforward activity. Experiments and models. Exp Brain Res 144: 430-444, 2002.
47. Sutter EE. The fast m-transform: a fast computation of cross-correlations with binary m-sequences. SIAM J Comput 20: 686-694, 1991.
48. Theunissen FE, David SV, Singh NC, Hsu A, Vinje WE, and Gallant JL. Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli. Network: Comput Neural Syst 12: 289-316, 2001.
49. Volgushev M, Vidyasagar TR, and Pei X. Dynamics of the orientation tuning of postsynaptic potentials in the cat visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 12: 621-628, 1995.
50. Watson AB and Ahumada AJ Jr. Model of human visual-motion sensing. J Opt Soc Am A 2: 322-341, 1985.
51. Watt RJ. Scanning from coarse to fine spatial scales in the human visual system after the onset of a stimulus. J Opt Soc Am A 4: 2006-2021, 1987.
52. Wilson HR, Blake R, and Halpern DL. Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. J Opt Soc Am A 8: 229-236, 1991.