Impact of prosthesis - Patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement: A multicentre analysis of early outcomes and mid-term survival

Heart

Volumn 97, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 1074-1081

  Shi, William Y ^a   Yap, Cheng Hon ^b,c   Hayward, Philip A ^a   Dinh, Diem T ^b   Reid, Christopher M ^b   Shardey, Gilbert C ^b,d   Smith, Julian A ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^d MONASH MEDICAL CENTRE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE PROSTHESIS; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; MORBIDITY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OBESITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS PATIENT MISMATCH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VICTORIA;

EID: 79957996374     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2010.219576     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Rahimtoola SH, Murphy E. Valve prosthesis - patient mismatch. A long-term sequel. Br Heart J 1981;45:331-5.
2. Dumesnil JG, Yoganathan AP. Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992;6(Suppl 1):S34-7.
3. Walther T, Rastan A, Falk V, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:15-19. (Pubitemid 44183638)
4. Tasca G, Mhagna Z, Perotti S, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation 2006;113:570-6.
5. Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WR, et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:783-96. (Pubitemid 37151965)
6. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003;108:983-8. (Pubitemid 37048229)
7. Monin JL. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: myth or reality? Heart 2009;95:948-52.
8. Rao V, Jamieson WR, Ivanov J, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2000;2:III5-9.
9. Bleiziffer S, Ali A, Hettich IM, et al. Impact of the indexed effective orifice area on midterm cardiac-related mortality after aortic valve replacement. Heart 2010;96:865-71.
10. Unger P, Magne J, Vanden Eynden F, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement. Heart 2010;96:1627-32.
11. Castro LJ, Arcidi JM Jr, Fisher AL, et al. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:31-6. (Pubitemid 34742000)
12. Aziz A, Lawton JS, Maniar HS, et al. Factors affecting survival after mitral valve replacement in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:1202-11.
13. Adatia I, Moore PM, Jonas RA, et al. Clinical course and hemodynamic observations after supraannular mitral valve replacement in infants and children. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1089-94. (Pubitemid 27149586)
14. Magne J, Mathieu P, Dumesnil JG, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival after mitral valve replacement. Circulation 2007;115:1417-25. (Pubitemid 46648377)
15. Li M, Dumesnil JG, Mathieu P, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary arterial pressure after mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1034-40. (Pubitemid 40432435)
16. Lam BK, Chan V, Hendry P, et al. The impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on late outcomes after mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1464-73.
17. Totaro P, Argano V. Patient-prosthesis mismatch after mitral valve replacement: myth or reality? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:697-701. (Pubitemid 47301959)
18. Jamieson WR, Germann E, Ye J, et al. Effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival with mitral valve replacement: assessment to 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:1135-41.
19. Chan W, Clark DJ, Ajani AE, et al. Progress towards a National Cardiac Procedure Database - development of the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS) and Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) registries. Heart Lung Circ 2011;20:10-18.
20. Andrianopoulos N, Dinh D, Duffy SJ, et al. Quality control activities associated with registries in interventional cardiology and surgery. Heart Lung Circ 2011;20:180-6.
21. ATS Medical Inc. Pre-Market Approval Application - Summary of Safety and Effectiveness. Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2000. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh-docs/pdf/P990046b.pdf (accessed 15 Jul 2010).
22. Medical Carbon Research Institute LLC. Pre-Market Approval Application - Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data On-X® Prosthetic Heart Valve, Models ONXM and ONXMC. Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2002. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh-docs/pdf/P000037S001b.pdf (accessed 15 Jul 2010).
23. Bitar JN, Lechin ME, Salazar G, et al. Doppler echocardiographic assessment with the continuity equation of St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the mitral valve position. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:287-93.
24. Malouf JF, Ballo M, Connolly HM, et al. Doppler echocardiography of 119 normal-functioning St Jude Medical mitral valve prostheses: a comprehensive assessment including time-velocity integral ratio and prosthesis performance index. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:252-6. (Pubitemid 40289046)
25. Blauwet LA, Malouf JF, Connolly HM, et al. Doppler echocardiography of 79 normal CarboMedics mitral prostheses: a comprehensive assessment including time-velocity integral ratio and prosthesis performance index. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:1125-30. (Pubitemid 47484165)
26. Chambers J, Cross J, Deverall P, et al. Echocardiographic description of the CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart valve. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:398-405.
27. St Jude Medical Inc. Pre-Market Approval Application - Summary of Safety and Effectiveness SJM Biocor® Valve and SJM Biocor® Supra Valve. Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2005. http://www.accessdata. fda.gov/cdrh-docs/pdf4/P040021b.pdf (accessed 15 Jul 2010).
28. St Jude Medical Inc. Instructions for Use - Stented Porcine Tissue Valves EpicTM/EpicTM Supra. St Paul, Minnesota: St Jude Medical Inc, 2007. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh-docs/pdf4/P040021S004b.pdf (accessed 15 Jul 2010).
29. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Gunzinger R, et al. European experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:333-9. (Pubitemid 35025610)
30. Medtronic Heart Valves. Pre-Market Approval Application - Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Mosaic® Porcine Bioprosthesis. Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2000. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh-docs/ pdf/P990064b.pdf (accessed 15 Jul 2010).
31. Fradet GJ, Bleese N, Burgess J, et al. Mosaic valve international clinical trial: early performance results. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71(5 Suppl):S273-7.
32. Firstenberg MS, Morehead AJ, Thomas JD, et al. Short-term hemodynamic performance of the mitral Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial valve. Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Investigators. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71.
33. Goetze S, Brechtken J, Agler DA, et al. In vivo short-term Doppler hemodynamic profiles of 189 Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004;17:981-7.
34. Blauwet LA, Malouf JF, Connolly HM, et al. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprostheses early after implantation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:656-66.
35. Mohty D, Dumesnil JG, Echahidi N, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:39-47.
36. Collis T, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, et al. Relations of stroke volume and cardiac output to body composition: the strong heart study. Circulation 2001;103:820-5. (Pubitemid 32163879)
37. Sezai A, Hata M, Niino T, et al. Fifteen years of experience with ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:1494-500.
38. Delgado JF, Conde E, Sánchez V, et al. Pulmonary vascular remodeling in pulmonary hypertension due to chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2005;7:1011-16. (Pubitemid 41443595)
39. Bolman RM 3rd. Survival after mitral valve replacement: does the valve type and/or size make a difference? Circulation 2007;115:1336-8.