An overview of recent developments in cognitive diagnostic computer adaptive assessments

Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Huebner, Alan ^a  

^a ACT INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957984646     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15317714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cheng, Y. (2009). When cognitive diagnosis meets computerized adaptive testing: CD-CAT. Psychometrika. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9125-0
2. De la Torre, J. (2009). DINA model and parameter estimation: A didactic. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 115-130.
3. De la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. (2004). Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika. 69(3), 333-353.
4. De la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. (2008). Model evaluation and multiple strategies in cognitive diagnosis: An analysis of fraction subtraction data. Psychometrika,73(4), 595-624.
5. Dempster, A., Laird, N., & Rubin, D. (1977). Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39, 1, 1-38.
6. DiBello, L., Roussos, L., & Stout, W. (2007). Review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models. In C.R Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.) Handbook of Statistics, 26, (pp. 979-1030). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Educational Testing Service (2004). Arpeggio: Release 1.1 [Computer software]. Princeton, NJ: Author.
8. Finkelman, M., Kim, W., & Roussos, L. (2009). Automated test assembly for cognitive diagnostic models using a genetic algorithm. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46 (3), 273-292.
9. Gierl, M., Cui, Y., & Zhou, J. (2009). Reliability and attribute-based scoring in cognitive diagnostic assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46 (3), 293-313.
10. Hartz, S. (2002). A Bayesian framework for the Unified Model for assessing cognitive abilities: blending theory with practice. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champain.
11. Hartz, S., Roussos, L., & Stout, W. (2002). Skills diagnosis: Theory and practice [User manual for Arpeggio software]. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
12. Henson, R., Templin J., & Willse J. (2009). Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables. Psychometrika, 74(2), 191-210.
13. Jang, E. (2008). A framework for cognitive diagnostic assessment. In C.A. Chapelle, Y.-R. Chung, & J. Xu (Eds.), Towards an adaptive CALL: Natural language Processing for diagnostic language assessment (pp.117-131). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
14. Junker, B., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 258-272.
15. Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64(2), 187-212.
16. th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén, L.K., & Muthén.
17. McGlohen, M., & Chang, H. (2008). Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 808-21.
18. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110 Stat. 1425 (2002).
19. Rupp, A., & Templin, J. (2008a). The effects of q-matrix misspecification on parameter Estimates and classification accuracy in the DINA model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(1), 78-96.
20. Rupp, A., & Templin, J. (2008b). Unique characteristics of diagnostic classification models: a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art. Measurement,6, 219-262.
21. Tatsuoka, C. (2002). Data analytic methods for latent partially ordered classification models. Applied Statistics, 51(3), 337-350.
22. Tatsuoka, C., & Ferguson, T. (2003). Sequential classification on partially ordered sets. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 65(1), 143-157.
23. Tatsuoka, K. (1985). A Probabilistic Model for Diagnosing Misconceptions in the Pattern Classification Approach. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 55-73.
24. Thompson, N. (2007). A practitioner's guide for variable-length computerized classification testing. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(1), 1-13.
25. Tierney, L. (1994). Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions. Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701-1786.
26. Von Davier, M. (2005). A General diagnostic model applied to language testing data. ETS Research Report. Princeton, New Jersey: ETS.
27. Van der Linden, W. (2000). Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests. In W.J. van der Linden & C.W. Glas (Eds.) Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 27-52). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. Weiss, D., & Kingsbury, G. (1984). Application of computerized adaptive testing to educational problems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(4), 361-374.
29. Xu, X., Chang, H., & Douglas, J. (2003). A simulation study to compare CAT strategies for cognitive diagnosis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
30. Xu, X. & von Davier, M. (2008). Linking for the general diagnostic model. ETS Research Report. Princeton, New Jersey: ETS.