Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 808-821

  McGlohen, Meghan ^a   Chang, Hua Hua ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COMPUTER; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

COGNITION; COMPUTERS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 50849108810     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.808     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. CHANG, H.-H., & YING, Z. (1999). α-Stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
2. CHIPMAN, S. F., NICHOLS, P. D., & BRENNAN, R. L. (1995). Introduction. In P. D. Nichols, S. F. Chipman, & R. L. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessment (pp. 1-18). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. DIBELLO, L. V., STOUT, W. F., & ROUSSOS, L. A. (1995). Unified cognitive/psychometric diagnostic assessment likelihood-based classification techniques. In P. D. Nichols, S. F. Chipman, & R. L. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessment (pp. 361-389). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE (2004). Arpeggio: Release 1.1 [Computer software]. Princeton, NJ: Author.
5. EMBRETSON, S. (1984). A general latent trait model for response processes. Psychometrika, 49, 75-186.
6. FISCHER, G. H. (1973). The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 37, 359-374.
7. HARTZ, S., ROUSSOS, L., & STOUT, W. (2002). Stills diagnosis: Theory and practice [User manual for Arpeggio software]. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
8. MARIS, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64, 187-212.
9. MCBRIDE, J. R., & MARTIN, J. T. (1983). Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military setting. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing (pp. 223-236). New York: Academic Press.
10. SHANNON, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical journal, 27, 379-423, 623-656.
11. TATSUOKA, K. K., & TATSUOKA, M. M. (1982). Detection of aberrant response patterns and their effect on dimensionality. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 215-231.
12. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (2001). No Child Left Behind Act, Public Law 107-110,115 Stat 1425.
13. VAN DER LINDEN, W. J. (2000). Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 27-52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
14. VAN DER LINDEN, W. J., & CHANG, H.-H. (2003). Implementing content constraints in alpha-stratified adaptive testing using a shadow test approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 107-120.
15. VAN DER LINDEN, W. J., & REESE, L. M. (1998). A model for optimal constrained adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 259-270.
16. XU, X., CHANG, H.-H., & DOUGLAS, J. (2003, April). A simulation study to compare CAT strategies for cognitive diagnosis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.