Global crises, American public administration, and the "new interventionism" revisited

Administration and Society

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 267-300

  Durant, Robert F ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

administrative reform; business government relations; regulatory policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957983453     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: 15523039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399711407613     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Balogh B. A government out of sight: The mystery of national authority in nineteenth-century America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press;.2009:.
2. Barzelay M. The new public management: Improving research and policy dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2001:.
3. Bauer R. A.,de Sola Pool I.,Dexter L. A.American business and public policy. New York, NY: Atherton Press; 1963:.
4. Baumgartner F. R.,Jones B. D. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1993:.
5. Baumgartner F. R.,Leech B. L. The multiple ambiguities of "counteractive lobbying.". American Journal of Political Science. 1996;40:521-542.
6. Baumgartner F. R.,Leech B. L. Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and in political science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1998:.
7. Baumgartner F.R.,Leech B.L. Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. Journal of Politics. 2001;63:1191-1213.
8. Berry J. M. The new liberalism: The rising power of citizen groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1999:.
9. Boston J.,Eichbaum C. State sector reform and renewal in New Zealand: Lessons for governance. In G. Caiden & T.-T. Su (Eds.),The repositioning of public governance. Taipei, Taiwan: Best-Wise; 2007:.
10. Burner D. Herbert Hoover: A public life. New York, NY: Knopf; 1978:.
11. Carpenter D. P. The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862-1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2001:.
12. Chapman J.,Duncan G. Is there now a "new" New Zealand model?.Public Management Review. 2007;9:1-25.
13. Cho D. Timothy Geithner's realm grows with the passage of financial regulatory reform. Washington Post. 2010;:A01.
14. Christianson T.,Laegreid P. NPM and beyond: Structure, culture, and demography. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2008;74:7-23.
15. Clemens E. S. Lineages of the Rube Goldberg state: Building and blurring public programs, 1900-1940. In I. Shapiro, S. Skowronek, & D. Galvin (Eds.),Rethinking political institutions: The art of the state. New York: New York University Press; 2006:187-215.
16. Dunleavy P.,Margetts H.,Bastow S.,Tinkler J. New public management is dead-Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2006;16:467-494.
17. Durant R. F. Whither the neoadministrative state? Toward a polity-centered theory of administrative reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2000;10:79-109.
18. Durant R. F. Sharpening a knife cleverly: Organizational change, policy paradox, and the "weaponizing" of administrative reform. Public Administration Review. 2008;66:282-294.
19. Durant R. F. Theory building, administrative reform movements, and the perdurability of Herbert Hoover. American Review of Public Administration. 2009;39:327-351.
20. Durant R. F.,Diehl P. F.Agendas, alternatives, and public policy: Lessons from the U.S. foreign policy arena.Journal of Public Policy. 1989;9:179-205.
21. Durant R. F.,Legge J. S. Public opinion, risk assessment, and biotechnology: Lessons from attitudes toward GMO foods in the European Union.Review of Policy Research. 2010;27:59-76.
22. Eisner M. A. Regulatory politics in transition. 2nd ed.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2000:.
23. Farazmand A. Building administrative capacity for the age of rapid globalization: A modest prescription for survival for the 21st century. Public Administration Review. 2009;69:1007-1020.
24. Frederickson G. H. The repositioning of American public administration. PS: Political Science & Politics. 1999;32:701-711.
25. Frederickson G. H.,Stazyk E. C. Myths, markets, and the "visible hand" of American bureaucracy. In R. F. Durant (Ed.),The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010:349-371.
26. Gerson M. J. Heroic conservatism: Why Republicans need to embrace America's ideals. New York, NY: HarperOne; 2008:.
27. Goodsell C. T. Mission mystique: Belief systems in public agencies. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2010:.
28. Hacker J. S,Pierson P. Winner-take-all politics: How Washington made the rich richer - and turned its back on the middle class. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks; 2010:.
29. Hart D. M. Herbert Hoover's last laugh: The enduring significance of the "associative state" in the United States.Paper presented at the Society for the History of Technology meeting, Lowell, MA, and the Northeastern Political Science Association meeting; Providence, RI; 10:1994.
30. Hawley E. W. Herbert Hoover, the Commerce Secretariat, and the vision of an "associative state," 1921-1928. Journal of American History. 1974;61:116-140.
31. Hawley, E. W. (Ed.). Herbert Hoover as Secretary of Commerce: Studies in New Era thought and practice. Hawley E. W., ed. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press; 1981:.
32. Helleiner E. Understanding the 2007-2008 global financial crisis: Lessons for scholars of international political economy. Annual Review of Political Science. 2011;14:67-87.
33. Hill M.,Hupe P. Implementing public policy. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2009:.
34. Hirschman A. O.Shifting involvements: Private interest and public action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1982:.
35. Hofstadter R. The American political tradition and the men who made it. New York, NY: Vintage; 1989:.
36. Howe D. W. The political culture of the American Whigs. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1979:.
37. Kamieniecki S. Corporate America and environmental policy: How often does business get its way?. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law and Politics; 2006:.
38. Kaplan S. Social engineers as saviors: Effects of World War I on some American liberals. Journal of the History of Ideas. 1956;XVII:347-369.
39. Kelman S.If you want to be a good fill-in-the-blank manager, be a good plain-vanilla manager. PS: Political Science and Politics. 2011;44:241-246.
40. Kennedy D. M. Freedom from fear: The American people in depression and war, 1929-1945. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
41. Kettl D. The transformation of governance: Public administration for 21st century America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2002:.
42. Kingdon J. W.America the unusual. Australia: Thomson/Wordsworth; 1999:.
43. Kolko G.The triumph of conservatism: A reinterpretation of American history, 1900-1916. New York, NY: Free Press; 1963:.
44. Koppell J. G. S. The politics of quasi-government: Hybrid organizations and the dynamics of bureaucratic control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
45. Koppell J. G. S. Reform in lieu of change: Tastes great, less filling.Public Administration Review. 2006;66:20-23.
46. Koppell J. G. S. The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy. Durant R. F., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010:128-150.
47. Kraft M.,Kamieniecki S. Business and environmental policy: Corporate interests in the American political system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007:.
48. Landler M.,Andrews E. L. (2008, October3). For Treasury Dept., now comes the hard part of bailout. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com.; 2008:.
49. Lears J. Rebirth of a nation: The making of modern America, 1877-1920. New York, NY: Harper Perennial; 2009:.
50. Legge J. S.,Durant R. F. Therapeutic cloning, regulatory regimes, and the "calculus of consent" in the European Union: A test of three hypotheses. Presented at the 69th International Atlantic Economic Conference; Prague, Czech Republic; 2010:.
51. Leviathan Inc. The Economist. 2010;:9.
52. Leviathan Stirs Again. The Economist. 2010;:23-26.
53. Light P. C. The true size of government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1999:.
54. Light P. C. The tides of reform revisited: Patterns in making government work, 1945-2002. Public Administration Review. 2006;66:6-19.
55. Lindblom C. Politics and markets. The world's political economic systems. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1977:.
56. Lindblom C. Politics and markets. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1980:.
57. Lipset S. M. American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York, NY: Norton; 1996:.
58. Lodge M.,Gill D.Toward a new era of administrative reform? The myth of post-NPM in New Zealand.Governance. 2011;24:141-166.
59. Lowi T. The end of liberalism. New York, NY: Norton; 1969:.
60. McClosky H.,Zaller J. The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1984:.
61. McFarland A. Neopluralism: The evolution of political process theory. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas; 2004:.
62. McGerr M. A fierce discontent: The rise and fall of the Progressive movement in America, 1870-1920. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003:.
63. Meacham J.,Thomas E. We are all socialists now.Newsweek. 2009;:23-27.
64. Melnick R. S. The politics of partnership.Public Administration Review. 1985;45:653-660.
65. Moe T. M. The politics of bureaucratic structure. In J. E. Chubb & P. E. Peterson (Eds.),Can the government govern?. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1989:267-329.
66. Moe T. M. Presidents, institutions, and theory. In G. C. Edwards, J. H. Kessel, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.),Researching the presidency: Vital questions, new approaches. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press; 1993:337-386.
67. Moran M. Business, politics, and society: An Anglo-American comparison. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
68. Morone J. A.The democratic wish: Popular participation and the limits of American government. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1990:.
69. Nabatchi T. Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: The potential of deliberative democracy for public administration.American Review of Public Administration. 2010;40:376-399.
70. Nabatchi T. Values frames in public administration: Looking to the future. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Public Administration; Baltimore, MD;. 2011:.
71. Olsen J. P. The ups and downs of bureaucratic organization.Annual Review of Political Science. 2008;11:13-37.
72. Polanyi M. The great transformation. 2nd ed.Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 2001:.
73. Pollitt C.,Bouckaert G. Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
74. Redford E. S. Democracy in the administrative state. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1969:.
75. Ripley R. B.,Franklin G. A. Congress, the bureaucracy, and public policy. 3rd ed.Homewood, IL: Dorsey; 1984:.
76. Roberts A. The logic of discipline: Global capitalism and the architecture of government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010:.
77. Roberts A. The first great depression: Crisis and disorder in the United States, 1837-1848. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; IN PRESS:.
78. Roubini N.,Mihm S. Crisis economics. New York, NY: Penguin; 2010:.
79. Sandel M. J. The procedural republic and the unencumbered self.Political Theory. 1984;12:81-96.
80. Schachter H. L. A gendered legacy? The Progressive reform era revisited. In R. F. Durant (Ed.),The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy. Durant R. F., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010:77-100.
81. Scharpf F. W. Games in hierarchies and networks: Analytical and empirical approaches to the study of governance institutions. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus Verlag; 1993:.
82. Schlozman K. L.,Tierney J. T. Organized interests and American democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1986:.
83. Scholz J. T.,Wood B. D. Controlling the IRS: Principals, principles, and public administration.American Journal of Political Science. 1998;42:141-162.
84. Schultz D. The crisis of public administration theory in a postglobal world. In D. C. Menzel & H. L. White (Eds.), The state of public administration: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Menzel D. C.White H. L., ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe; 2011:453-463.
85. Sklar M. J. The corporate reconstruction of American capitalism, 1890-1916. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1988:.
86. Skocpol T. Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap; 1992:.
87. Skowronek S. Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877-1920. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1982:.
88. Smith M. A.American business and political power: Public opinion, elections, and democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2000:.
89. Soss, J., Hacker, J. S., & Mettler, S. (Eds.). Remaking America: Democracy and public policy in an age of inequality. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2007:.
90. Stivers C. Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the Progressive Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas; 2000:.
91. Suleiman E. Dismantling democratic states. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2003:.
92. TaitiN. (2011). New EU bank stress test rules out soon. Retrieved from FT.com.
93. Taleb N. N. The Black Swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York, NY: Random House; 2007:.
94. Thelen K. Historical institutionalism and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 1999;2:369-404.
95. Trachtenberg A. The incorporation of America: Culture and society in the Gilded Age. New York, NY: Hill and Wang; 2007:.
96. Vogel D. Fluctuating fortunes: The political power of business in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1989:.
97. Weinstein J. The corporate ideal in the liberal state. Boston, MA: Beacon; 1968:.
98. Wiebe R. H.The search for order, 1877-1920. New York, NY: Hill and Wang; 1967:.
99. Wilentz S. The rise of American democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln. New York, NY: Norton; 2005:.
100. Wilson J. Q.Bureaucracy. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1989:.