Improvement of the prediction of mouthfeel attributes of liquid foods by a posthumus funnel

Journal of Texture Studies

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 217-227

  Kutter, Alexander ^a   Singh, Jaswinder Pal ^a   Rauh, Cornelia ^a   Delgado, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contraction; Mouthfeel; Nozzle; Pipe flow; Posthumus funnel; Prediction; Texture

Indexed keywords

CONTRACTION; LIQUID FOOD; MOUTHFEEL; NEWTONIAN FLUIDS; NEWTONIANS; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; ORAL CAVITY; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRIES; POSTHUMUS FUNNEL; PREDICTION; RHEOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS; SHEAR RATES; TECHNICAL APPLICATIONS; TEXTURE PROPERTIES; TWO CYLINDERS;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIQUIDS; NOZZLES; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RHEOLOGY; SHEAR DEFORMATION; TEXTURES; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

FORECASTING;

EID: 79957902971     PISSN: 00224901     EISSN: 17454603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.2011.00291.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BARNES, H.A. 1980. Rheometry: Industrial Applications, Research Studies Press, New York, NY.
2. BIRD, R.B., STEWART, W.E. and LIGHTFOOT, E.N. 2006. Transport Phenomena, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
3. BOGER, D.V. 1987. Viscoelastic fows through contractions. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19, 157-182.
4. BOILOT, P., HINES, E.L., GONGORA, M.A. and FOLLAND, R.S. 2003. Electronic noses inter-comparison, data fusion and sensor selection in discrimination of standard fruit solutions. Sens. Actuators B 88, 80-88.
5. BOURNE, M.C. 2002. Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement, Academic Press, London, U.K.
6. BREZMES, J., FERRERAS, B., LLOBET, E., VILANOVA, X. and COREEIG, X. 1997. Neural network based electronic nose for the classification of aromatic species. Anal. Chim. Acta 348, 503-509.
7. CHHABRA, R.P. and RICHARDSON, J.F. 2008. Non-Newtonian Flow and Applied Rheology, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K.
8. CUTLER, A.N., MORRIS, E.R. and TAYLOR, L.J. 1983. Oral perception of viscosity in fluid foods and model systems. J. Texture Studies 14, 377-395.
9. DE WIJK, R.A., PRINZ, J.F. and JANSSEN, A.M. 2006. Explaining perceived oral texture of starch-based custard desserts from standard and novel instrumental tests. Food Hydrocolloids 20, 24-34.
10. DE WIJK, R.A., VAN GEMERT, L.J., TERPSTRA, M.E.J. and WILKINSON, C.L. 2003. Texture of semi-solids; sensory and instrumental measurements on vanilla custard desserts. Food Qual. Prefer. 14, 305-317.
11. DURST, F. 2006. Grundlagen Der Stroemungsmechanik, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
12. ENGELEN, L. and VAN DER BILT, A. 2008. Oral physiology and texture perception of semisolids. J. Texture Studies 39, 83-113.
13. FINNEY, E.E. 1971. Random vibration techniques for non-destructive evaluation of peach firmness. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 16, 81-87.
14. FINNEY, E.E. and ABBOT, J.A. 1972. Sensory and objective measurement of peach firmness. J Texture Studies 3, 372-378.
15. HAUGEN, J. and UNDELAND, I. 2009. Lipid oxidation in herring fillets during ice storage measured by a commercial hybrid gas sensor array system. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51, 752-759.
16. HELLINGA, C., SOMSEN, D.J. and KOENRAADS, J.P.J.M. 1986. Viscosity of stirred yoghurt: Modern techniques useful in analysing and improving routine measurements. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 40, 217-240.
17. JANHOJ, T., PETERSEN, C.B., FROST, M.B. and IPSEN, R. 2006. Sensory and rheological characterization of low-fat stirred yogurt. J. Texture Studies 37, 276-298.
18. KRISHNAMURTHY, R., SRIVASTAVAB, A.K., PATONC, J.E., BELLD, G.A. and LEVY, D.C. 2007. Prediction of consumer liking from trained sensory panel information: Evaluation of neural networks. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 275-285.
19. KUEHN, N., JACOBASCH, H.J. and LUNKENHEIMER, K. 1986. Zum Zusammenhang zwischen dem Kontaktwinkel zwischen Wasser und festen Polymeren und ihrem Zeta-Potential gegenueber waeßrigen Loesungen. Acta Polymerica 37, 394-396.
20. KUTTER, A., RAUH, C. and DELGADO, A. 2009. Prediction of the mouth feel of semi solid foods by means of cognitive algorithms. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Food Rheology and Structure, pp. 116-119.
21. NJOBUENWU, D., OBOHO, E. and GUMUS, R. 2007. Determination of contact angle from contact area of liquid droplet spreading on solid substrate. Leonardo Electron. J. Pract. Technol. 6, 29-38.
22. OPENFOAM 2009. (accessed July 9, 2009).
23. POOLE, R.J. and RIDLEY, B.S. 2007. Development length requirements for fully developed laminar pipe flow of inelastic non-Newtonian liquid. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 129, 1281-1287.
24. POSTHUMUS, G. 1954. Meten van de viscositeit. Een toestelletje voor het bepalen van de viscositeit van enkele consumtiemelkproducten. Off. Org. Koninkl. Nederl. Zuivelbond 4, 55-56.
25. QUENOT, G.M., PAKLEZA, J. and KOWALEWSKI, T.A. 1998. Particle image velocimetry with optical flow. Exp. Fluids 25, 177-189.
26. RAO, M.A. 2007. Rheology of Fluid and Semisolid Foods, Springer, New York, NY.
27. RUSCHE, H. 2002. Computational fluid dynamics of dispersed two-phase flows at high phase fractions. PhD Thesis, Imperial College of London.
28. SAYEED, M.S., WHITTAKER, A.D. and KEHTARNAVAZ, N.D. 1995. Snack quality evaluation method based on image features and neural network prediction. Trans. ASAE 38, 1239-1245.
29. SHAMA, F. and SHERMAN, P. 1973. Identification of stimuli controlling the sensory evaluation of viscosity. J. Texture Studies 4, 111-118.
30. SITAKALIN, C. and MEULLENET, J.F.C. 2001. Prediction of cooked rice texture profiles using instrumental spectral extrusion data modeled with partial least squares regression and artificial neural networks (ANN). Food Sci. 78, 391-394.
31. VAN VLIET, T. 2002. On the relation between texture perception and fundamental mechanical parameters for liquids and time dependent solids. Food Qual. Prefer. 13, 227-236.
32. VOISEY, P.W. 1975. Selecting deformation rates in texture tests. J Texture Studies 6, 253-257.
33. WILLERT, C. and GHARIB, M. 1991. Digital particle image velocimetry. Exp. Fluids 10, 181-193.
34. WOOD, F.W. 1968. Psychophysical Studies on the Consistency of Liquid Food, Monograph no. 27.Society of Chemical Industry, London, U.K.