Dealing with the long-term social implications of research

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 5-9

  Fleischman, Alan ^a   Levine, Carol ^b   Eckenwiler, Lisa ^c   Grady, Christine ^d   Hammerschmidt, Dale E ^e   Sugarman, Jeremy ^f  

^a March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation   (United States)

^b United Hospital Fund   (United States)

^c GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^f JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human subjects research; IRB (institutional review board); Research ethics

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ALCOHOLISM; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); ETHICS; GENETIC ENHANCEMENT; HARM REDUCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL DISEASE; POLICY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOPATHY; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADVISORY COMMITTEES; ALCOHOLISM; ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GENETIC ENHANCEMENT; GENETICS, BEHAVIORAL; HARM REDUCTION; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL DISORDERS; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL VALUES; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE;

EID: 79957878624     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2011.560337     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Botkin, J. R. 1998. Ethical issues and practical problems in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics 26(1): 17-28, 3.
2. Carey, C., and I. I. Gottesman. 2006. Genes and antisocial behavior: Perceived versus real threats to jurisprudence. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics 34(2): 342-351.
3. Capron, A.M. 1997. An egg takes flight: The once and future life of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7(1): 63-80.
4. Coffin, P. Syringe availability as HIV prevention: A review of modalities. 2000. Journal of Urban Health 77(3): 306-330.
5. Gaylin, W., R. Macklin, and T. M. Powledge. 1981. Violence and the politics of research. New York: Plenum Press.
6. Gray, B. H. 1980. Changing federal regulations of IRBs, Part III: Social research and the proposed DHEW regulations. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 2(1): 1-5, 12.
7. Hallfors, D. D., B. J. Iritani, W. C. Miller, and D. J Bauer. 2007. Sexual and drug behavior patterns and HIV and STD racial disparities: The need for new directions. American Journal of Public Health 97(1): 125-132.
8. Hampton, T. 2006. Interplay of genes and environment found in adolescents' alcohol abuse. Journal of American Medical Association 295(15): 1760-1762.
9. Harris, J. 2006. The moral choice: Prospective mothers should have the right to select embryos on the basis of knowing as much as possible about their future health. New Science 190(2556): 24.
10. Hastings Center Research Group. 1976. MBD, drug research and the schools:Aconference onmedical responsibility and community control. Hastings Center Report suppl. 6(June).
11. Hastings Center Research Group. 1979. Science, politics and public controversy: The UCLA Violence Center. Hastings Center Report suppl. 9 (April).
12. Hastings Center Research Group. 1980. The XYY controversy: Researching violence and genetics. Hastings Center Report suppl. 10 (August).
13. Hellerstedt, W. L., M. Peterson-Hickey, K. L. Rhodes, and A. Garwick. 2006. Environmental, social, and personal correlates of having ever had sexual intercourse among American Indian youths. American Journal of Public Health 96(12): 2228-2234.
14. Kass, L. R. 2005. Reflections on public bioethics: A view from the trenches. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15(3): 221-250.
15. King, N. M. P. 2002. RAC oversight of gene transfer research: A model worth extending? Journal Law Medicine and Ethics 30(3): 381-389.
16. Miller, J. W., T. S. Naimi, R. D. Brewer, and S. E. Jones. 2007. Binge drinking and associated health risk behaviors among high school students. Pediatrics 119(1): 76-85.
17. Moffitt, T. E. 2005. Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behaviors: Evidence from behavioral genetic research. Advances in Genetics 55: 41-104.
18. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1978. Institutional review boards. Washington, DC: DHEW Government Printing Office.
19. Paone, D., D. C. Des Jarlais, Gangloff, J. Milliken, and S.R. Friedman. 1995. Syringe exchange: HIV prevention, key findings, and future directions. International Journal of Addiction 30(12): 1647-1683.
20. Parens, E. 1996. Respect for the RAC. Science 272(5268): 1569-1570.
21. Parens, E. 2005. Authenticity and ambivalence: Toward understanding the enhancement debate. Hastings Center Report 35(3): 34-41.
22. Moreno, J. D. 1996. Do bioethics commissions hijack public debate? Hastings Center Report 26: 47.
23. Moreno, J. D. 2002. In focus. The brief career of a government advisory committee: One member's perspective. The life and death of the National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee. American Journal of Bioethics 2(4):W23.
24. Sandel, M. J. 2004. The case against perfection: What's wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering. Atlantic Monthly 292(3): 50-54, 56-60, 62.
25. Schwartz, R. L. 1983. Institutional review ofmedical research: Costbenefit analysis, risk-benefit analysis, and the possible effects of research on public policy. Journal of Legal Medicine 4(2): 143-166.
26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2005. Code of Federal Regulations 45CFR46.101-409. Revised June 23, 2005. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
27. van, Belzen, M. J., and P. Hetulink. 2006. Genetic analysis of psychiatric disorders in humans. Genes Brain and Behavior 5(suppl. 2): 25-33.