|
|
Volumn 17, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1434-1436
|
|
Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized study
|
|
Author keywords
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Operating ports; Surgical technique; Trocars
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BILIARY TRACT DISEASE;
BILIARY TRACT SURGERY;
CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
CHRONIC CHOLECYSTITIS;
FEMALE;
GALLSTONE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LAPAROSCOPE;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
LENGTH OF STAY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
PATIENT POSITIONING;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TROCAR;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BILE DUCTS;
CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
|
EID: 0141650718
PISSN: 09302794
EISSN: 14322218
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8713-1 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (73)
|
|
References (8)
|
