Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1904-1908

  Sun, Shaoliang ^a   Yang, Kehu ^a   Gao, Mingtai ^a   He, Xiaodong ^a   Tian, Jinhui ^a   Ma, Bin ^a  

^a LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA EXTRACTION; EMBASE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPE; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY CONTROL; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TROCAR;

CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 69049111668     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0108-1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. F Dubois P Icard G Berthelot, et al. 1990 Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: premilary report of 36 cases Ann Surg 211 60
2. GS Litynski 1999 Profiles in laparoscopy: Mouret, Dubois, and Perissat-the laparoscopic breakthrough in Europe (1987-1988) JSLS 3 163
3. C Cerci OR Tarhan I Barut, et al. 2007 Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy Hepatogastroenterology 54 15
4. FH Welter 2006 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a never-ending success story? MMW Fortschr Med 148 38
5. A Kalloo S Kantsevoy 2001 Gallstones and biliary diseases Primary Care 28 591 606
6. LK Nathanson S Shimi A Cushchieri 1991 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Dundee technique Br J Surg 78 155
7. DO Olsen 1991 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 161 339
8. S Trichak 2003 Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 17 1434 1436
9. YW Novitsky KW Kercher DR Czerniach, et al. 2005 Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial Arch Surg 140 1178
10. M Kumar CS Agrawal RK Gupta 2007 Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal JSLS 11 358
11. K Slim D Pezet J Stencl Jr, et al. 1995 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique World J Surg 19 394
12. D Osborne B Boe AS Rosemurgy, et al. 2005 Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery Am Surg 71 298
13. PL Leggett CD Bissell R Churchman-Winn, et al. 2001 Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients Surg Endosc 15 293
14. Collaboration TC (2006) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 4.2.6. The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK
15. A Gupta UK Shrivastava P Kumar, et al. 2005 Minilaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial Trop Gastroenterol 26 149
16. MQ Hu XJ Song CW Jiang, et al. 2005 Clinical application and study on three-port-looping laparoscopic cholecystectomy China J Endosc 11 552
17. WT Ng 1998 Three-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cautionary note Surg Laparosc Endosc 8 159