Acceptable compression ratio of full-field digital mammography using JPEG 2000

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 66, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 609-613

  Kang, B J ^a   Kim, H S ^a   Park, C S ^a   Choi, J J ^a   Lee, J H ^a   Choi, B G ^a  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST TUMOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL COMPRESSION; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; DATA COMPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 79957761315     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: 1365229X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Slone RM, Foos DH, Whiting BR, et al. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation. Radiology 2000;215:543-53. (Pubitemid 30237858)
2. Agarwal A, Rowberg AH, Kim Y. Fast JPEG 2000 decoder and its use in medical imaging. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed 2003;7:184-90.
3. Lee KH, Kim YH, Kim BH, et al. Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1529-34.
4. Ringl H, Schernthaner RE, Bankier AA, et al. JPEG 2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality. Radiology 2006;240:869-77.
5. Shiao YH, Chen TJ, Chuang KS, et al. Quality of compressed medical images. J Digit Imaging 2007;20:149-59.
6. Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Palisson P, et al. Wavelet compression of medical images. Radiology 1998;206:599-607. (Pubitemid 28128502)
7. Slone RM, Muka E, Pilgram TK. Irreversible JPEG compression of digital chest radiographs for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold. Radiology 2003;228:425-9. (Pubitemid 36910082)
8. Tamm EP, Thompson S, Venable SL, et al. Impact of multislice CT on PACS resources. J Digit Imaging 2002;15(Suppl. 1):96-101.
9. Rubin GD. 3-D imaging with MDCT. Eur J Radiol 2003;45(Suppl. 1):S37-41.
10. Rubin GD. Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol 2000;36:74-80.
11. Lee KH, Lee HJ, Kim JH, et al. Managing the CT data explosion: initial experiences of archiving volumetric datasets in a mini-PACS. J Digit Imaging 2005;18:188-95.
12. Liang Z, Du X, Liu J, et al. Effects of different compression techniques on diagnostic accuracies of breast masses on digitized mammograms. Acta Radiol 2008;49:747-51.
13. Kocsis O, Costaridou L, Varaki L, et al. Visually lossless threshold determination for microcalcification detection in wavelet compressed mammograms. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2390-6. (Pubitemid 37220377)
14. Koff D, Bak P, Brownrigg P, et al. Pan-Canadian evaluation of irreversible compression ratios. J. Digital Imaging 2009;22:569-78.
15. Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Good WF, et al. Applying computer-assisted detection schemes to digitized mammograms after JPEG data compression: an assessment. Acad Radiol 2000;7:595-602. (Pubitemid 30602826)
16. Goldberg MA, Gazelle GS, Boland GW, et al. Focal hepatic lesions: effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT. Radiology 1997;202:159-65. (Pubitemid 27024122)
17. Cosman PC, Davidson HC, Bergin CJ, et al. Thoracic CT images: effect of lossy image compression on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 1994;190:517-24. (Pubitemid 24044263)
18. Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, et al. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 2006;239:385-91.
19. Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, et al. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:177-82. (Pubitemid 36741481)
20. Radiology. ACo. Breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.